Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of cmajCMAJ Information for AuthorsCMAJ Home Page
CMAJ. 1986 November 1; 135(9): 991–997.
PMCID: PMC1491283

Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination.


Despite recommendations supporting annual influenza vaccination for people aged 65 years or older, vaccination rates remain low. Several studies have evaluated the effect of sending mailed reminders, but few have compared alternative ways of reminding patients to receive the vaccine. In a randomized trial of 939 patients aged 65 years or older in four family practices carried out between Oct. 23 and Dec. 31, 1984, we compared three ways of reminding elderly patients to receive the vaccine: personal reminder by the physician, telephone reminder by the nurse and reminder by letter. The vaccination rates for the three groups were 22.9%, 37% and 35.1% respectively. No reminder was issued to a control group, and the rate was 9.8%. Some patients could not be reached by telephone, and some did not see the physician during the specified time. Among the patients whom the nurse actually contacted, the vaccination rate was 43.5%; the rate for patients whom the doctor actually saw was 45.1%. Overall, a telephone reminder by the nurse was the most effective method, and at an hourly salary of $16 or less this method would also be the most cost-effective. The reminders used in this study were automatically generated from a computerized medical record system. The study shows how a computerized system can be used to identify patients for whom preventive procedures are due.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Influenza vaccination of elderly persons. Reduction in pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations and deaths. JAMA. 1980 Dec 5;244(22):2547–2549. [PubMed]
  • Schoenbaum SC. Influenza vaccine--unacceptable or unaccepted. Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):219–221. [PubMed]
  • Cummings KM, Jette AM, Brock BM, Haefner DP. Psychosocial determinants of immunization behavior in a swine influenza campaign. Med Care. 1979 Jun;17(6):639–639. [PubMed]
  • Anderson C, Martin H. Effectiveness of patient recall system on immunization rates for influenza. J Fam Pract. 1979 Oct;9(4):727–730. [PubMed]
  • Henk M, Froom J. Outreach by primary-care physicians. JAMA. 1975 Jul 21;233(3):256–259. [PubMed]
  • Frank JW, Henderson M, McMurray L. Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 1. Determinants of acceptance. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Feb 15;132(4):371–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ryan MP, MacLeod AF. A comparison of adverse effects of two influenza vaccines, and the influence on subsequent uptake. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Aug;34(265):442–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Larson EB, Bergman J, Heidrich F, Alvin BL, Schneeweiss R. Do postcard reminders improve influenza compliance? A prospective trial of different postcard "cues". Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):639–648. [PubMed]
  • Fedson DS, Kessler HA. A hospital-based influenza immunization program, 1977-78. Am J Public Health. 1983 Apr;73(4):442–445. [PubMed]
  • Larson EB, Olsen E, Cole W, Shortell S. The relationship of health beliefs and a postcard reminder to influenza vaccination. J Fam Pract. 1979 Jun;8(6):1207–1211. [PubMed]
  • Frank JW, McMurray L, Henderson M. Influenza vaccination in the elderly: 2. The economics of sending reminder letters. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Mar 1;132(5):516–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association