Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of cmajCMAJ Information for AuthorsCMAJ Home Page
CMAJ. 1992 March 15; 146(6): 911–917.
PMCID: PMC1488617

Use of reminders to increase compliance with tetanus booster vaccination.


OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of three computerized reminder systems on compliance with tetanus vaccination. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of 8069 patients 20 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5589 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group, a telephone reminder group or a letter reminder group. The remaining 2480 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. Results are presented for the 5242 randomized patients and the 2369 nonrandomized patients for whom there was no up-to-date record of tetanus vaccination at the start of the trial. INTERVENTIONS: For the patients in the physician reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to assess the patient's tetanus vaccination status and to recommend vaccination; those in the other two reminder groups received a telephone call or letter enquiring about their tetanus vaccination status and recommending a booster dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of patients who received tetanus toxoid during the study year or who had a claim of vaccination in the previous 10 years. MAIN RESULTS: The rate of recorded tetanus vaccination in the randomized control group was 3.2%. The difference between that rate and those for the three reminder groups was 19.6% in the physician reminder group (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1% to 22.2%, p less than 0.00001), 20.8% in the telephone reminder group (95% CI 18.3% to 23.5%, p less than 0.00001) and 27.4% in the letter reminder group (95% CI 24.8% to 30.2%, p less than 0.00001)). The letter reminders were more effective than either the telephone reminders (p = 0.00013) or the physician reminders (p less than 0.00001) in improving compliance. The cost to the practice per additional vaccination recorded was 43 for the physician reminders, $5.43 for the telephone reminders and $6.05 for the letter reminders. CONCLUSIONS: Although all three reminder systems increased the rate of recorded tetanus vaccination they fell far short of achieving complete population coverage. More intensive interventions would be required to approach that goal. However, such interventions do not appear to be justified given the rarity of tetanus.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W. Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):991–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rosser WW, McDowell I, Newell C. Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine. CMAJ. 1991 Oct 1;145(7):807–814. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 30;318(26):1728–1733. [PubMed]
  • Mullooly JP. Tetanus immunization of adult members of an HMO. Am J Public Health. 1984 Aug;74(8):841–842. [PubMed]
  • Lurie N, Manning WG, Peterson C, Goldberg GA, Phelps CA, Lillard L. Preventive care: do we practice what we preach? Am J Public Health. 1987 Jul;77(7):801–804. [PubMed]
  • Dixon AM, Bibby JA. Tetanus immunisation state in a general practice population. BMJ. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):598–598. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hutchison BG, Shannon HS. Effect of repeated annual reminder letters on influenza immunization among elderly patients. J Fam Pract. 1991 Aug;33(2):187–189. [PubMed]
  • IPSEN J., Jr Immunization of adults against diphtheria and tetanus. N Engl J Med. 1954 Sep 16;251(12):459–466. [PubMed]
  • Millian SJ, Cherubin CE, Sherwin R, Fuerst HT. A serologic survey of tetanus and diphtheria immunity in New York City. Arch Environ Health. 1967 Dec;15(6):776–781. [PubMed]
  • Ruben FL, Nagel J, Fireman P. Antitoxin responses in the elderly to tetanus-diphtheria (TD) immunization. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Aug;108(2):145–149. [PubMed]
  • Crossley K, Irvine P, Warren JB, Lee BK, Mead K. Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in urban Minnesota adults. JAMA. 1979 Nov 23;242(21):2298–2300. [PubMed]
  • Weiss BP, Strassburg MA, Feeley JC. Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in an elderly population in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jul;73(7):802–804. [PubMed]
  • Scheibel I, Bentzon MW, Christensen PE, Biering A. Duration of immunity to diphtheria and tetanus after active immunization. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;67(3):380–392. [PubMed]
  • Rubbo SD. New approaches to tetanus prophylaxis. Lancet. 1966 Aug 27;2(7461):449–453. [PubMed]
  • Gottlieb S, Martin M, McLaughlin FX, Panaro RJ, Levine L, Edsall G. Long-term immunity to diphtheria and tetanus: a mathematical model. Am J Epidemiol. 1967 Mar;85(2):207–219. [PubMed]
  • Peebles TC, Levine L, Eldred MC, Edsall G. Tetanus-toxoid emergency boosters: a reappraisal. N Engl J Med. 1969 Mar 13;280(11):575–581. [PubMed]
  • Simonsen O, Kjeldsen K, Heron I. Immunity against tetanus and effect of revaccination 25-30 years after primary vaccination. Lancet. 1984 Dec 1;2(8414):1240–1242. [PubMed]
  • Comstock George W, Brownlow Wilfred J, Joseph J Mehsen, Garber Howard J. Validity of interview information in estimating community immunization levels. Health Serv Rep. 1973 Oct;88(8):750–757. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Edsall G, Elliott MW, Peebles TC, Eldred MC. Excessive use of tetanus toxoid boosters. JAMA. 1967 Oct 2;202(1):111–113. [PubMed]
  • Collier LH, Polakoff S, Mortimer J. Reactions and antibody responses to reinforcing doses of adsorbed and plain tetanus vaccines. Lancet. 1979 Jun 30;1(8131):1364–1368. [PubMed]
  • Levine L, Edsall G. Tetanus toxoid: what determines reaction proneness? J Infect Dis. 1981 Oct;144(4):376–376. [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association