Many studies support the view that cells in the undifferentiated gonad are bipotential; the supporting cell precursor lineage can develop into follicle cells or Sertoli cells. In
Fgf9
−/− XY gonads, cells initially embark on the Sertoli pathway, but in the absence of
Fgf9 can neither maintain
Sox9 expression nor establish downstream male pathways. The loss of Sertoli cells in XY
Fgf9
−/− gonads is not due to cell death, but instead to a transition of supporting cell fate as SOX9 expression is lost. We suggest that in the absence of the antagonizing activity of FGF9, WNT4 signals predominate and govern somatic cell fate in the gonadal field.
The
Drosophila genital disk is also a field of cells that normally follows one of two sexually dimorphic fates. For many years it was believed that the fate of each cell in the genital disk was under the cell-autonomous control of
double sex (dsx), the key regulator of the sex determination pathway. However, mosaic studies have shown that the genetic sex of the cells in the anterior/posterior organizers of the disk, not the sex of the majority of cells in the disk, regulate the sexually dimorphic fate of the disk. This occurs through the sex-specific regulation of WNT, FGF, and transforming growth factor beta signaling, which in turn regulate the growth, cell differentiation, and morphogenesis of the disk [
41,
42]. Sex-specific regulation of gonad organogenesis in vertebrates may occur in a similar manner, where some cells are cell-autonomously responsive to the sex-determining switch; however, the establishment of the male or female program occurs through the non-cell-autonomous activity of classic signaling pathways that act in an antagonistic manner and coordinate growth, cell differentiation and morphogenesis in the gonad.
The interplay between cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous pathways in the mammalian gonad is not well understood. In XX↔XY chimera experiments, XX cells can be recruited to the Sertoli lineage, indicating that non-cell-autonomous signaling mechanisms operate under these conditions [
15]. Other more recent studies have suggested that paracrine signals could be involved in the establishment of Sertoli cells [
43–
46]. The current study reveals that ectopic FGF9 can induce SOX9 under conditions in which XX cells are dissociated (
F), when an FGF9-coated bead is directly applied to the XX gonad (
K), or when the dose of
Wnt4 is reduced (
G). Whether FGF9 normally acts non-cell-autonomously in vivo to recruit XY cells to the Sertoli lineage by up-regulating SOX9 is not clear. We show that
Sry can initially up-regulate SOX9 in the absence of
Fgf9, suggesting that FGF9 is not necessary for this step. However, FGF9 may act to trigger cell proliferation, increasing the number of Sertoli precursors above a threshold needed to stabilize the male pathway, consistent with threshold requirements deduced from earlier studies using XX↔XY chimeric gonads [
15]. Since Sertoli cells produce FGF9, loss of proliferation of Sertoli precursors may result in a reduction of the overall level of FGF9, and/or other male paracrine signals, below a critical threshold level required to antagonize the influence of WNT4. This model is appealing, because it links cell proliferation, believed to be required for establishment of the male pathway [
9], with Sertoli fate determination. A recent study by Yoshioka et al. [
47] showed that misexpression of
Fgf9 in chick nephrogenous mesenchyme led to the expansion of gonadal marker gene expression, implicating
Fgf9 in gonadal cell proliferation across species.
It has been suggested that SOX9 represses WNT4 based on misexpression studies [
48]. Here we show that the addition of FGF9 protein to XX gonad explant cultures repressed the expression of
Wnt4. Down-regulation of
Wnt4 is unlikely to occur through SOX9, as SOX9 is not up-regulated in this situation [
7]. Furthermore, although both SRY and SOX9 are initially expressed in
Fgf9
−/− XY gonads,
Wnt4 is not down-regulated in the absence of
Fgf9 (
K). These findings support the idea that FGF9 acts as the antagonist of
Wnt4. Antagonism of WNT signals may be a multistep process involving both the transcriptional down-regulation of
Wnt4 observed in this study and the destabilization of downstream Wnt intracellular pathways that antagonize SOX9 expression, as shown in chondrocyte differentiation [
49], or that compete for intracellular signal transducers as has been reported in other systems [
50,
51]. Future work will address these possibilities.
In support of the idea that
Wnt4 antagonizes the male pathway, we found that the loss of
Wnt4 caused the up-regulation of both SOX9 and FGF9 in XX gonads where
Sry is absent. It appears that the male pathway can be initiated by disrupting the balance between
Wnt4 and
Fgf9, a finding that has strong implications for other vertebrate sex-determination systems in which
Sry is not the sex determining factor. However, up-regulation of
Sox9 is not sufficient to establish testis development in this mutant, as occurs in
Odsex and other gain-of-function mutants where
Sox9 is misexpressed in the XX gonad [
24,
25]. In those two misexpression cases,
Sox9 expression may have been artificially sustained by exogenous regulatory sequences that bypass the fine dosage balance in this signaling network.
In
Wnt4 mutants, SOX9 expression is not maintained. In light of the observation that the
Wnt4
−/− XX gonad does not increase significantly in size (
), it is possible that the FGF9/SOX9-expressing population did not reach a critical threshold. Alternatively (or in addition), another male-specific factor normally dependent on
Sry may be required to sustain SOX9 expression, possibly FGF-binding proteins in the extracellular matrix or FGF receptors. It is equally plausible that there are other female-specific factors that antagonize the establishment of SOX9 expression. It has been observed that several other WNTs are expressed in the XX gonad [
52], and these or other factors may partially compensate for the loss of
Wnt4.
These findings suggest that WNT4 signaling normally acts as a repressor of the male pathway by interfering with the up-regulation of SOX9 expression. One report of a duplication of the region of human Chromosome 1, which includes
WNT4, led to an intersex phenotype [
53]. However, the report constitutes only circumstantial evidence. Such a role is not supported by efforts to misexpress
Wnt4 in XY gonads, which have led to very mild phenotypes with no evidence for defects in Sertoli cell differentiation [
54]. It is possible that WNT4 protein did not function as an active signal in these transgenic mice, either because it was not expressed in the right cells, at the right time, or at the right level. Consistent with our data and the partially sex-reversed phenotype of
Wnt4
−/− XX mutants, other WNTs or additional female factors may be required.
The switch that controls sex determination is biologically diverse.
Sry is not present in nonmammalian systems; however, antagonistic signaling between FGFs and WNTs may be the conserved mechanism that balances the gonad between testicular and ovarian fates in vertebrates. In theory, any genetic or environmental switch may tip the balance toward the male pathway. Based on our findings we propose that cells in the mammalian gonad are balanced between two competing cell fates by counterbalanced signaling pathways,
Fgf9, expressed near the coelomic surface, and
Wnt4, expressed near the mesonephric border (
). In mammalian XY gonads, the onset of
Sry expression initiates the male pathway by up-regulating
Sox9. SOX9 up-regulates
Fgf9, which initiates a
Sox9/Fgf9 feed-forward loop that accelerates commitment to the male pathway. In XX gonads or XY mutant gonads lacking
Sry, Sox9, or
Fgf9, the SOX9/FGF9 feed-forward loop is not established, and WNT4 gains control of the gonadal field. This results in the down-regulation of
Sox9 and
Fgf9, tilting the balance toward commitment to the female pathway. Further experiments will be required to define the molecular mechanism of FGF9 and WNT4 action. However, our in vivo and in vitro data strongly support the antagonistic relationship of these two signaling pathways in regulating expression of the testis-determining factor SOX9.