Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 October; 47(423): 627–630.
PMCID: PMC1410112

Predictors of the provision of intrapartum care by general practitioners: five-year cohort study.


BACKGROUND: There is little published evidence that any aspect of vocational training for general practice improves the quality of care provided by general practitioners (GPs). AIM: To investigate whether aspects of education and vocational training predict whether GPs provide intrapartum care. METHOD: A five-year prospective cohort study was carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) using responders to a 1990 national survey of GPs for whom a current UK address could be found. Main outcome measures were factors associated with provision of GP intrapartum care in 1995. RESULTS: In 1995, a minority of ex-trainees (65 out of 349, 18%) provided intrapartum care as GPs, although 28% would ideally have wished to do so; 8% provided home delivery care. Four education and training variables were associated with ex-trainees booking women for GP delivery in 1995: the number of partners in the ex-trainee's GP training practice providing GP intrapartum care (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30); performing forceps deliveries as an obstetric senior house officer (SHO) (OR = 1.24), witnessing episiotomies as a student (OR = 1.17), and witnessing twin deliveries as a student (OR = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of GP intrapartum care, future service provision is associated with certain education and training variables. There is a mismatch between GPs' ideal and actual maternity care provision. Changes to enhance such care would be needed at least at three levels: selection and approval of training practices, content and base for SHO posts, and practice arrangements for maternity cover.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (792K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Horder JP. Physicians and family doctors: a new relationship. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jul;27(180):391–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Reeve H, Bowman A. Hospital training for general practice: views of trainees in the North Western region. BMJ. 1989 May 27;298(6685):1432–1434. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grant J, Marsden P, King RC. Senior house officers and their training. I. Personal characteristics and professional circumstances. BMJ. 1989 Nov 18;299(6710):1263–1265. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Crawley HS, Levin JB. Training for general practice: a national survey. BMJ. 1990 Apr 7;300(6729):911–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith LF. GP trainees' views on hospital obstetric vocational training. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1447–1450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kelly DR, Murray TS. Twenty years of vocational training in the west of Scotland: the practice component. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Dec;41(353):492–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ennis M. Training and supervision of obstetric senior house officers. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1442–1443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Styles WM. Training experience of doctors certificated for general practice in 1985-90. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Dec;41(353):488–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Young GL. General practice and the future of obstetric care. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jul;41(348):266–267. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schmittling G, Tsou C. Obstetric privileges for family physicians: a national study. J Fam Pract. 1989 Aug;29(2):179–184. [PubMed]
  • Baldwin LM, Hart LG, Rosenblatt RA. Differences in the obstetric practices of obstetricians and family physicians in Washington State. J Fam Pract. 1991 Mar;32(3):295–299. [PubMed]
  • Smith LF. Roles, risks, and responsibilities in maternity care: trainees' beliefs and the effects of practice obstetric training. BMJ. 1992 Jun 20;304(6842):1613–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Blunt SM. Training in obstetrics. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1416–1416. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McFaul PB, Taylor DJ, Howie PW. The assessment of clinical competence in obstetrics and gynaecology in two medical schools by an objective structured clinical examination. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Sep;100(9):842–846. [PubMed]
  • Smith LF. Provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jun;44(383):255–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brown DJ. Opinions of general practitioners in Nottinghamshire about provision of intrapartum care. BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):777–779. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith LF. Views of pregnant women on the involvement of general practitioners in maternity care. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):101–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Davies J, Hey E, Reid W, Young G. Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group. BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1302–1306. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith LF, Jewell D. Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988. BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):13–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Street P, Gannon MJ, Holt EM. Community obstetric care in West Berkshire. BMJ. 1991 Mar 23;302(6778):698–700. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baird AG, Jewell D, Walker JJ. Management of labour in an isolated rural maternity hospital. BMJ. 1996 Jan 27;312(7025):223–226. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lowry S. Strategies for implementing curriculum change. BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1482–1485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lowry S. Trends in health care and their effects on medical education. BMJ. 1993 Jan 23;306(6872):255–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners