PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 February; 48(427): 971–974.
PMCID: PMC1409972

Comparison of video-recorded consultations with those in which patients' consent is withheld.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Video-recorded consultations are widely used for research in general practice. Recently, video recordings have begun to be used for the purposes of general practitioner (GP) registrar assessment. It is unknown, however, whether consultations in which patients withhold consent for recording differ from those that are recorded. AIM: To compare clinical problems and demographic characteristics of adult patients who consent to the video recording of consultations with those who withhold consent. METHOD: This was prospective study of 538 adult patients consulting 42 GPs, based in practices throughout Leicestershire. Each patient attended a surgery session with one of the 42 GPs between April 1995 and March 1996. Clinical presentations and demographic characteristics of patients consenting and withholding consent to the video recording of their consultations were compared. GPs' perceptions of whether patients in these two groups were distressed/upset or embarrassed were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 85.9% (462/538) of adults consented to video recording, and 14.1% (76/538) withheld consent. Multiple logistic regression revealed that patients who presented with a mental health problem were more likely to withhold consent to recording (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.6). Younger patients were also more likely to withhold consent to video recording. Additionally, where patients' consent was withheld, GPs perceived patients to be more distressed or embarrassed. CONCLUSION: Younger patients and those suffering from mental health problems are more likely than others to withhold consent to being video recorded for research purposes in general practice. The implications of this study for the assessment of registrar GPs using video-recorded consultations are discussed.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (868K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Campion PD, Butler NM, Cox AD. Principle agendas of doctors and patients in general practice consultations. Fam Pract. 1992 Jun;9(2):181–190. [PubMed]
  • Tylee AT, Freeling P, Kerry S. Why do general practitioners recognize major depression in one woman patient yet miss it in another? Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Aug;43(373):327–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tylee A, Freeling P, Kerry S, Burns T. How does the content of consultations affect the recognition by general practitioners of major depression in women? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Nov;45(400):575–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Howe A. Detecting psychological distress: can general practitioners improve their own performance? Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jul;46(408):407–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):537–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell LM, Howie JG, Murray TS. Use of videotaped consultations in summative assessment of trainees in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):137–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell LM, Murray TS. Summative assessment of vocational trainees: results of a 3-year study. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jul;46(408):411–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Martin E, Martin PM. The reactions of patients to a video camera in the consulting room. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Nov;34(268):607–610. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G. Assessing the consultation: methods of observing trainees in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jun 2;288(6431):1659–1660. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Herzmark G. Reactions of patients to video recording of consultations in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):315–317. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell IK. Audio-visual recording in the surgery: do patients mind? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Sep;32(242):548–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C. Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors' consultation behaviour? Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Nov;40(340):455–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Campbell LM, Murray TS. Assessment of competence. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Oct;46(411):619–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Carnall D. Summative assessment in general practice. BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):638–639. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners