Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of gutGutView this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Gut. 1995 March; 36(3): 437–441.
PMCID: PMC1382461

Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London.


The liver section of the British Society of Gastroenterology and the research unit of the Royal College of Physicians collaborated to set up a nationwide audit to investigate the practice of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales. Each of 189 health districts in England and Wales was approached to provide a list of 10 consecutive percutaneous biopsies performed during 1991, and details of demographic data, indications, suspected diagnosis, investigations, biopsy technique, outcome, and influence on patient management were collected. Data were retrieved on 1500 (79%). The age distribution showed 6% of biopsies were done in those over 80 years of age and as many over 90 as under 10 years of age. Suspected malignancy and chronic liver disease each contributed one third of the indications. In 34% the procedure was carried out by radiologists under ultrasound image control. The remainder were done by general physicians and gastroenterologists, with the operator in the second group being more senior and experienced. The Trucut biopsy needle accounted for two thirds of biopsies, the remainder being the Menghini type. For both needles the samples were recorded as excellent or satisfactory in 83% and inadequate in only 5%. Bleeding complicated 26 procedures (1.7%), requiring transfusion in 11, and was commoner when clotting was impaired or serum bilirubin raised. There were two definite and three possible procedure related, given an overall mortality of 0.13-0.33%. The diagnosis made before biopsy was confirmed in 63% of patients, and the clinician found the biopsy helpful in treatment in 75%. Day case biopsy and techniques to reduce the risk of bleeding were surprisingly rare in this series, which has given a unique opportunity to examine everyday practice across a wide range of hospitals.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • SHERLOCK S. Needle biopsy of the liver: a review. J Clin Pathol. 1962 Jul;15:291–304. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hegarty JE, Williams R. Liver biopsy: techniques, clinical applications, and complications. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Apr 28;288(6426):1254–1256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hubscher SG, Clements D, Elias E, McMaster P. Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft. J Clin Pathol. 1985 Dec;38(12):1366–1373. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Van Thiel DH, Gavaler JS, Wright H, Tzakis A. Liver biopsy. Its safety and complications as seen at a liver transplant center. Transplantation. 1993 May;55(5):1087–1090. [PubMed]
  • Colombo M, Del Ninno E, de Franchis R, De Fazio C, Festorazzi S, Ronchi G, Tommasini MA. Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous liver biopsy: superiority of the Tru-Cut over the Menghini needle for diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988 Aug;95(2):487–489. [PubMed]
  • Ha HK, Sachs PB, Haaga JR, Abdul-Karim F. CT-guided liver biopsy: an update. Clin Imaging. 1991 Apr-Jun;15(2):99–104. [PubMed]
  • Zins M, Vilgrain V, Gayno S, Rolland Y, Arrivé L, Denninger MH, Vullierme MP, Najmark D, Menu Y, Nahum H. US-guided percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of the needle track: a prospective study in 72 high-risk patients. Radiology. 1992 Sep;184(3):841–843. [PubMed]
  • Riley SA, Ellis WR, Irving HC, Lintott DJ, Axon AT, Losowsky MS. Percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of needle track: a safe method for use in patients with impaired coagulation. Lancet. 1984 Aug 25;2(8400):436–436. [PubMed]
  • Tobin MV, Gilmore IT. Plugged liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Jan;34(1):13–15. [PubMed]
  • Allison DJ, Adam A. Percutaneous liver biopsy and track embolization with steel coils. Radiology. 1988 Oct;169(1):261–263. [PubMed]
  • Sawyerr AM, McCormick PA, Tennyson GS, Chin J, Dick R, Scheuer PJ, Burroughs AK, McIntyre N. A comparison of transjugular and plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. J Hepatol. 1993 Jan;17(1):81–85. [PubMed]
  • Rösch J, Lakin PC, Antonovic R, Dotter CT. Transjugular approach to liver biopsy and transhepatic cholangiography. N Engl J Med. 1973 Aug 2;289(5):227–231. [PubMed]
  • Bull HJ, Gilmore IT, Bradley RD, Marigold JH, Thompson RP. Experience with transjugular liver biopsy. Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1057–1060. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McAfee JH, Keeffe EB, Lee RG, Rösch J. Transjugular liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1992 Apr;15(4):726–732. [PubMed]
  • Westaby D, MacDougall BR, Williams R. Liver biopsy as a day-case procedure: selection and complications in 200 consecutive patients. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1331–1332. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jacobs WH, Goldberg SB. Statement on outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Mar;34(3):322–323. [PubMed]
  • Janes CH, Lindor KD. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 15;118(2):96–98. [PubMed]
  • Cohen MB, A-Kader HH, Lambers D, Heubi JE. Complications of percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Gastroenterology. 1992 Feb;102(2):629–632. [PubMed]
  • Sheets PW, Brumbaugh CJ, Kopecky KK, Pound DC, Filo RS. Safety and efficacy of a spring-propelled 18-gauge needle for US-guided liver biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1991 Feb;2(1):147–149. [PubMed]
  • Mladinich CR, Ackerman N, Berry CR, Buergelt CD, Longmate J. Evaluation and comparison of automated biopsy devices. Work in progress. Radiology. 1992 Sep;184(3):845–847. [PubMed]
  • Littlewood ER, Gilmore IT, Murray-Lyon IM, Stephens KR, Paradinas FJ. Comparison of the Trucut and Surecut liver biopsy needles. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jul;35(7):761–763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vargas-Tank L, Martínez V, Jirón MI, Soto JR, Armas-Merino R. Tru-cut and Menghini needles: different yield in the histological diagnosis of liver disease. Liver. 1985 Jun;5(3):178–181. [PubMed]
  • Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2(2):165–173. [PubMed]
  • Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, Cooppan RM, Naran AD, Pirie D, Pudifin DJ. Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet. 1986 Mar 8;1(8480):523–525. [PubMed]
  • Maharaj B, Bhoora IG. Complications associated with percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver when one, two or three specimens are taken. Postgrad Med J. 1992 Dec;68(806):964–967. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lindner H. Grenzen und Gefahren der perkutanen Leberbiopsie mit der Menghini-Nadel. Erfahrungen bei 80,000 Leberbiopsien. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967 Sep 29;92(39):1751–1757. [PubMed]
  • McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1990 Nov;99(5):1396–1400. [PubMed]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group