Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. 1991 May; 41(346): 192–193.
PMCID: PMC1371654

Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.


The Aylesbury spatula and a newer plastic device, the Cervex sampler (Steriseal), have been compared in a prospective study, to assess their ability to obtain endocervical cells on cervical smears taken in general practice. Twelve general practitioners in Cumbria took part in the study each taking equal numbers of smears from women with the Aylesbury spatula and the Cervex sampler. On average each practice took 20 smears with each instrument. All women attending for cervical smears for whatever reason were included in the study. Endocervical cells were reported in 62.8% of smears taken with the Aylesbury spatula and in 78.2% taken with the Cervex sampler (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.41). Increasing the percentage of smears which contain endocervical cells by using the Cervex sampler would reduce the number of repeat tests needed. This would cut down anxiety and inconvenience for the patient, and reduce costs for the health service.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (403K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Gondos B, Marshall D, Ostergard DR. Endocervical cells in cervical smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Nov 15;114(6):833–834. [PubMed]
  • Vooijs PG, Elias A, van der Graaf Y, Veling S. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1985 May-Jun;29(3):323–328. [PubMed]
  • Rylander E. Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56(2):115–118. [PubMed]
  • Greening SE. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited. Diagn Cytopathol. 1985 Jan-Mar;1(1):55–58. [PubMed]
  • Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Acta Cytol. 1986 May-Jun;30(3):264–270. [PubMed]
  • Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Acta Cytol. 1989 Nov-Dec;33(6):843–848. [PubMed]
  • Vooijs GP. Endocervical brush device. Lancet. 1989 Apr 8;1(8641):784–784. [PubMed]
  • Frost JK. Diagnostic accuracy of "cervical smears". Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1969 Jul;24(7 Pt 2):893–908. [PubMed]
  • Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 May 7;296(6632):1313–1316. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Acta Cytol. 1983 May-Jun;27(3):225–229. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners