Transport of transition metal ions (reviewed in reference
30) is a challenging problem for prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. These ions are found in nanomolar concentrations in standard natural environments and are essential cofactors in housekeeping and specialized metabolic processes (reviewed in reference
31). Deregulated increase of the cellular metal content, however, for instance as a consequence of uncontrolled ion uptake in metal-polluted environments, is hazardous to various cellular targets. Therefore, transition metal uptake systems must operate within a narrow range. They have to recognize metal ions with very high affinity and selectivity. On the other hand, transport with very low capacity rather than high capacity is an adaptation to cellular requirements. The latter can be achieved by strict regulation of the amounts of transporter protein in the cell or by a very low velocity of the transport process itself. In the present study we attempted to get insight into the molecular basis of selective high-affinity, low-capacity transition metal cation transport, choosing
R. eutropha HoxN and
R. rhodochrous NhlF for examination. The two bacterial transporters represent functional variants of the structurally related NiCoTs, a family of membrane proteins whose members are widespread in bacteria and have recently been identified in the genome sequences of certain archaeal and fungal species. HoxN is a selective Ni
2+ permease and is not inhibited by Mn
2+, Co
2+, and Zn
2+ (
4). NhlF shows a preference for the Co
2+ ion, transports Ni
2+ with high affinity in the absence of Co
2+, and is not affected by Mn
2+ and Zn
2+ (
4). Chimeras and site-specifically altered HoxN and NhlF variants were constructed and analyzed to uncover determinants of selectivity. Replacement of His-68 and His-74 in NhlF by Ile residues affected both Co
2+ and Ni
2+ transport. The H68I mutant showed reduced transport of the two ions, probably due to reduced affinity, whereas the H74I mutant was completely inactive. Similar behaviors, i.e., reduction of affinity for Ni
2+ and inactivation, were observed in a previous study for the corresponding mutants of HoxN (
10), and thus, we conclude that (i) HoxN and NhlF employ very similar transport mechanisms and (ii) Co
2+ and Ni
2+ run along the same path in NhlF.
A second approach focused on the analysis of hybrid permeases. This technique has provided valuable information on the substrate recognition domains in various transporters, including human and rat catecholamine transporters (
2), yeast and
Chlorella monosaccharide transporters (
23,
29), and
E. coli aromatic amino acid transporters (
3). The latter study uncovered a small region responsible for the different substrate profiles and activities of the AroP general aromatic transport system and the PheP high-affinity phenylalanine transport system, demonstrating the effectiveness of this method. Nonetheless, although AroP and PheP are 61% identical on the amino acid level, none of the AroP-PheP hybrids displayed overall transport activity above 50% of either of the parent proteins and some chimeras had lost activity completely (
3). Likewise, three out of four NhlF-HoxN hybrids described in the present study, although present in amounts comparable to wild-type HoxN and NhlF in
E. coli membranes, were inactive. This result could be a consequence of tertiary structure rearrangements, since many interhelical and protein-lipid contact sites might be altered in hybrid permeases. Nevertheless, the moderate activity of chimera 1 pointed to a role of TMD I in ion recognition. Komeda et al. (
17) have reported that the signature VXLHVLGXAL in the central part of TMD I of NhlF is also found in TMD V of Cot1p, a transporter of the cation diffusion facilitator family in yeast vacuoles involved in the detoxification of Co
2+ and Zn
2+ (
19,
20). They speculated that the structures of TMD I may be important for the different substrate profiles of NhlF and HoxN (
17). Our data are in agreement with this hypothesis because TMD I of NhlF can confer on a selective Ni
2+ permease the ability to transport Co
2+ ion.
The third approach was based on multiple alignments of NiCoT sequences which identified a striking correlation between pairs of amino acid residues in TMDs I and II. Experimental topological analyses of HoxN (
7,
10) and NixA (
13) have localized these residues to the central parts of TMDs I and II. These findings, and the rule that transmembrane helices in membrane proteins are in spatial contact with sequence neighbors in almost every case (
1), led us to assume that TMDs I and II interact to form a central part of the selectivity filter. Previous work on HoxN (
10) and NixA (
12) has revealed that histidine and other residues in TMD II with the potential to carry a charge are essential for Ni
2+ transport. Our present results point to an important role for the Asn or His residue at a position in TMD I which is conserved in bacterial and fungal NiCoTs. Histidine is the more versatile residue and can be protonated to give a positive charge, whereas asparagine does not ionize. HoxN activity was not affected by the N31H replacement, suggesting that the Lewis base function of an unprotonated imidazole nitrogen can compensate for the amide-containing side chain. His-34 is critical for NhlF activity. As in the case of HoxN, a hydrophobic Ile residue is not tolerated at this position. Strong reduction of transport activity has also been observed for a similar variant of NixA of
H. pylori (
32). The H34N exchange had a slight inhibitory effect on Co
2+ uptake but caused significant inhibition of Ni
2+ uptake. This result is difficult to explain. It reflects the preference of wild-type NhlF for the Co
2+ ion.
The results of this and a previous study (
4) show that NhlF significantly and reproducibly surpasses HoxN in Ni
2+ uptake activity. The higher capacity is correlated with lower specificity and could be due to weaker metal coordination in the selectivity filter, allowing faster movement of ions through the transporter. A hydrophobic residue within the NiCoT signature sequence in TMD II is a critical factor for transport capacity. This position is occupied by valine, phenylalanine, or in a few cases, leucine. The Val residue in HoxN correlates with lower activity and higher specificity than the Phe-containing NhlF. Indeed, converting Val-64 to Phe resulted in considerably increased Ni
2+ uptake at various substrate concentrations and conferred to HoxN the ability to transport Co
2+, although with a low capacity. Correspondingly, the F70V exchange in NhlF led to strongly decreased transport activity. These data suggest that the bulkier Phe residue hinders tight metal ion coordination, a prerequisite for extremely high selectivity.
We also constructed double mutants by conversion of the His-Phe pair in NhlF to Asn-Val and of the Asn-Val pair in HoxN to His-Phe, and we replaced the Val residue in TMD II of chimera I with Phe. However, these variants contributed little information, since all three were completely inactive (data not shown).
As shown for Kcs, a structurally well-investigated, selective K
+ channel (
34), it is a prerequisite for selective ion transport to remove the outer water shell of the ions and to replace inner shell water molecules with amino acid side chain and/or backbone ligands. Selective recognition of divalent transition metal cations by NiCoTs through the hydration sphere is hardly conceivable, since the ion radii and, thus, the charge densities and the volumes of the water shell are too similar. However, different preferences of the dehydrated cations for the kind and number of ligands and for the coordination type can be exploited. Octahedrally coordinated Ni
2+ (83 pm) and Co
2+ (79 pm in the low-spin state) have smaller radii than Cu
2+ (87 pm) and Zn
2+ (88 pm). In addition, the latter ions prefer lower coordination numbers, resulting in radii below 75 pm. The radius of six-coordinate low-spin Mn
2+ (81 pm) is in between those of Co
2+ and Ni
2+, but this ion has a stronger preference than Ni
2+ and Co
2+ for ligands in the hard Lewis base category like O-donor moieties. Ni
2+ and Co
2+ are closely related metal ions. Nevertheless, HoxN is able to discriminate between the two cations and to selectively transport Ni
2+. Our data have shown that interaction of TMDs I and II contributes to specificity and that replacement of a single hydrophobic residue in TMD II can interfere with capacity and specificity. The roles of other conserved features, for instance, the conserved signature in TMD III, the essential hydrophilic loop connecting TMDs IV and V, and the pairs of acidic residues in TMDs V and VI (reviewed in reference
9) for NiCoT activity need closer investigation. A very recent report on
H. pylori NixA mutants assigned an essential role in nickel transport to the FX
2GH sequence conserved in TMD III of NiCoTs (
32).
Most of the NiCoTs have not yet been experimentally investigated, and thus, it is too soon to draw conclusions on the substrate profile of the family in its entirety. Future physiological, biochemical, and structural analyses will clarify whether or not the designation NiCoT family is appropriate.