PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Tob Control. 2005 August; 14(4): 272–277.
PMCID: PMC1343525
NIHMSID: NIHMS5864

The perimetric boycott: a tool for tobacco control advocacy

Abstract

Objectives: To propose criteria to help advocates: (1) determine when tobacco related boycotts may be useful; (2) select appropriate targets; and (3) predict and measure boycott success.

Methods: Analysis of tobacco focused boycotts retrieved from internal tobacco industry documents websites and other scholarship on boycotts.

Results: Tobacco related boycotts may be characterised by boycott target and reason undertaken. Most boycotts targeted the industry itself and were called for political or economic reasons unrelated to tobacco disease, often resulting in settlements that gave the industry marketing and public relations advantages. Even a lengthy health focused boycott of tobacco industry food subsidiaries accomplished little, making demands the industry was unlikely to meet. In contrast, a perimetric boycott (targeting institutions at the perimeter of the core target) of an organisation that was taking tobacco money mobilised its constituency and convinced the organisation to end the practice.

Conclusions: Direct boycotts of the industry have rarely advanced tobacco control. Perimetric boycotts of industry allies offer advocates a promising tool for further marginalising the industry. Successful boycotts include a focus on the public health consequences of tobacco use; an accessible point of pressure; a mutual interest between the target and the boycotters; realistic goals; and clear and measurable demands.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Offen N, Smith EA, Malone RE. From adversary to target market: the ACT-UP boycott of Philip Morris. Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):203–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Reggars John W, French Simon D, Walker Bruce F, Cameron Melainie, Pollard Henry, Vitiello Andrew, Werth Peter D. RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CHIROPRACTORS AND OSTEOPATHS: Neck Manipulation & Vertebrobasilar Stroke. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2003 Mar;11(1):9–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Elder JP, Amick TL, Sleet DA, Senn KL. Potential consumer participation in a boycott of tobacco-company-owned nontobacco products. Am J Prev Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;3(6):323–326. [PubMed]
  • Malone RE, Balbach ED. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith Elizabeth A, Malone Ruth E. Altria means tobacco: Philip Morris's identity crisis. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):553–556. [PubMed]
  • Malone Ruth E. Tobacco industry surveillance of public health groups: the case of STAT (Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco) and INFACT (Infant Formula Action Coalition). Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):955–960. [PubMed]
  • Cooper R, Simmons BE. Cigarette smoking and ill health among black Americans. N Y State J Med. 1985 Jul;85(7):344–349. [PubMed]
  • Smith Elizabeth A, Malone Ruth E. The outing of Philip Morris: advertising tobacco to gay men. Am J Public Health. 2003 Jun;93(6):988–993. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group