PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jaccidemLink to Publisher's site
 
J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 November; 13(6): 406–408.
PMCID: PMC1342810

What information do general practitioners want about accident and emergency patients?

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish what information general practitioners (GPs) want about their patients who attend accident and emergency (A&E) departments and the GPs' preferences for the type of communication and method of delivery. METHODS: Analysis of questionnaire sent to all 350 GPs in the catchment area of one A&E department. RESULTS: 219 completed questionnaires (63%) were returned. GPs requested information about most new attendances at A&E, but only 50% of GPs wanted details of every new A&E patient. Most GPs preferred a small computer generated letter or sticky label which included details of investigation results, diagnosis, treatment, and follow up arrangements. 47% of GPs requested delivery of letters by the pathology specimen service, but 25% preferred hand delivery by the patient or a relative. Individual GPs often had widely different preferences, especially about the type of communication and method of delivery. Most GPs would value a monthly list of all their patients who have attended A&E. CONCLUSIONS: GPs need prompt and appropriate information about their patients who attend A&E. A computerised records system should be arranged so that relevant information can be produced easily and quickly in a format suitable for filing in GP records. Good communications with GPs would improve the continuity of care for A&E patients.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (478K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Williams MJ, Haley P, Gosnold JK. An improved method of communication between computerized accident and emergency departments and general practitioners. Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Sep;8(3):192–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dover SB, Low-Beer TS. The initial hospital discharge note: send out with the patient or post? Health Trends. 1984 May;16(2):48–48. [PubMed]
  • Sandler DA, Mitchell JR. Interim discharge summaries: how are they best delivered to general practitioners? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Dec 12;295(6612):1523–1525. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson R. Clinical system security: interim guidelines. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):109–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lloyd BW, Barnett P. Use of problem lists in letters between hospital doctors and general practitioners. BMJ. 1993 Jan 23;306(6872):247–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mageean RJ. Study of "discharge communications" from hospital. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Nov 15;293(6557):1283–1284. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zoltie N, De Dombal FT. Communication between GPs and consultants. BMJ. 1992 May 2;304(6835):1181–1182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sherry M, Edmunds S, Touquet R. The reliability of patients in delivering their letter from the hospital accident and emergency department to their general practitioner. Arch Emerg Med. 1985 Sep;2(3):161–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group