Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmjcredLink to Publisher's site
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 March 15; 292(6522): 746–750.
PMCID: PMC1339793

Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.


Overemphasis on hypothesis testing--and the use of P values to dichotomise significant or non-significant results--has detracted from more useful approaches to interpreting study results, such as estimation and confidence intervals. In medical studies investigators are usually interested in determining the size of difference of a measured outcome between groups, rather than a simple indication of whether or not it is statistically significant. Confidence intervals present a range of values, on the basis of the sample data, in which the population value for such a difference may lie. Some methods of calculating confidence intervals for means and differences between means are given, with similar information for proportions. The paper also gives suggestions for graphical display. Confidence intervals, if appropriate to the type of study, should be used for major findings in both the main text of a paper and its abstract.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1005K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Mainland D. Statistical ritual in clinical journals: is there a cure?--I. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Mar 17;288(6420):841–843. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Altman DG, Gore SM, Gardner MJ, Pocock SJ. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489–1493. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rothman KJ. A show of confidence. N Engl J Med. 1978 Dec 14;299(24):1362–1363. [PubMed]
  • Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1979 Jan;59(1):8–13. [PubMed]
  • Altman DG. Statistics and ethics in medical research. VI--Presentation of results. Br Med J. 1980 Dec 6;281(6254):1542–1544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jones DR, Rushton L. Simultaneous inference in epidemiological studies. Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Sep;11(3):276–282. [PubMed]
  • Gardner MJ. Letter: Understanding and presenting variation. Lancet. 1975 Jan 25;1(7900):230–231. [PubMed]
  • Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics. XXXVII. Demeaned errors, confidence games, nonplussed minuses, inefficient coefficients, and other statistical disruptions of scientific communication. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Nov;20(5):617–631. [PubMed]
  • Altman DG. Statistics in medical journals. Stat Med. 1982 Jan-Mar;1(1):59–71. [PubMed]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group