PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjcredBMJ helping doctors make better decisionsSearchLatest content
 
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 March 15; 292(6522): 746–750.
PMCID: PMC1339793
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.
M J Gardner and D G Altman
Abstract
Overemphasis on hypothesis testing--and the use of P values to dichotomise significant or non-significant results--has detracted from more useful approaches to interpreting study results, such as estimation and confidence intervals. In medical studies investigators are usually interested in determining the size of difference of a measured outcome between groups, rather than a simple indication of whether or not it is statistically significant. Confidence intervals present a range of values, on the basis of the sample data, in which the population value for such a difference may lie. Some methods of calculating confidence intervals for means and differences between means are given, with similar information for proportions. The paper also gives suggestions for graphical display. Confidence intervals, if appropriate to the type of study, should be used for major findings in both the main text of a paper and its abstract.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1005K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page.
Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Publishing Group