PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cmajCMAJ Information for AuthorsCMAJ Home Page
 
CMAJ. 1991 October 1; 145(7): 807–814.
PMCID: PMC1335900

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three computerized reminder systems in the delivery of five preventive procedures in family practice. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of 8502 patients 15 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5883 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group (passive) or a telephone or letter reminder group (active). The remaining 2619 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. INTERVENTION: During 1 year the patients in the active reminder groups received a telephone call or letter reminding them of any overdue preventive procedures; for those in the passive reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to provide any overdue service. OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates of completion of the preventive procedures required. MAIN RESULTS: All three reminder systems significantly improved the delivery of preventive services (p less than 0.001). The procedure completion rates were 42.0% in the letter reminder group, 42.0% in the telephone reminder group, 33.7% in the physician reminder group and 14.1% in the randomized control group. The use of a letter was more cost-effective than the telephone system, but the physician reminder system was the most cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Computerized reminder systems do improve the delivery of preventive services in family practice.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Wechsler H, Levine S, Idelson RK, Rohman M, Taylor JO. The physician's role in health promotion--a survey of primary-care practitioners. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jan 13;308(2):97–100. [PubMed]
  • Battista RN, Palmer CS, Marchand BM, Spitzer WO. Patterns of preventive practice in New Brunswick. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 1;132(9):1013–1015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W. Comparison of three methods of recalling patients for influenza vaccination. CMAJ. 1986 Nov 1;135(9):991–997. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson C, Martin H. Effectiveness of patient recall system on immunization rates for influenza. J Fam Pract. 1979 Oct;9(4):727–730. [PubMed]
  • Gerace TM, Sangster JF. Influenza vaccination: a comparison of two outreach strategies. Fam Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;20(1):43–45. [PubMed]
  • Evans CE, Haynes RB, Birkett NJ, Gilbert JR, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, Johnston ME, Hewson SA. Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care. JAMA. 1986 Jan 24;255(4):501–504. [PubMed]
  • Frame PS. Periodic health screening in a rural private practice. J Fam Pract. 1979 Jul;9(1):57–64. [PubMed]
  • Brownbridge G, Evans A, Fitter M, Platts M. An interactive computerized protocol for the management of hypertension: effects on the general practitioner's clinical behaviour. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 May;36(286):198–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, Tierney WM, Cohen SJ, Weinberger M, McCabe GP. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):130–138. [PubMed]
  • Chu FZ, Day RG. Smoking recognition by family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1981 Apr;12(4):657–660. [PubMed]
  • Fleming DM, Lawrence MS. An evaluation of recorded information about preventive measures in 38 practices. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Oct;31(231):615–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Standing P, Mercer S. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):883–886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hodes C. Cervical screening--refusal in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Mar;22(116):172–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Spenser JT. A survey of cervical smear screening in general practice. Practitioner. 1967 Feb;198(184):274–280. [PubMed]
  • Kleinman JC, Kopstein A. Who is being screened for cervical cancer? Am J Public Health. 1981 Jan;71(1):73–76. [PubMed]
  • Fidler HK, Boyes DA, Worth AJ. Cervical cancer detection in British Columbia. A progress report. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Apr;75(4):392–404. [PubMed]
  • Elmslie T, Rosser WW. Computerization of family practice. CMAJ. 1986 Feb 1;134(3):221–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McDowell I, Newell C, Rosser W. A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3):297–305. [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association