PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jathtrainLink to Publisher's site
 
J Athl Train. 2000 Apr-Jun; 35(2): 145–150.
PMCID: PMC1323410

Optimal Burst Duration During a Facilitated Quadriceps Femoris Contraction

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the most efficient burst duty cycle for eliciting an involuntary quadriceps femoris contraction in healthy subjects. This information will allow clinicians to make an informed decision about the optimal burst duty cycle based upon a specific treatment goal. The logical goal for such a treatment choice is to enhance motor unit recruitment in an effort to maintain postoperative or postinjury strength, when voluntary contractions may be less effective.

Design and Setting:

Single-group and 5-measures design. All tests were performed in a university laboratory.

Subjects:

Forty-eight healthy subjects (27 men and 21 women; mean age, 26.4 ± 8.5 years) performed a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) on an isokinetic device and received neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) at 5 different burst duty cycles.

Measurements:

Subjects first performed an MVIC for knee extension on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60° of knee flexion. NMES surface electrodes were applied to the quadriceps muscle of each subject's dominant leg. The values for the NMES were 2500-Hz carrier frequency, 50-bursts-per-second treatment frequency, amplitude increased to maximum tolerance, and burst duty cycle set to each of the 5 comparison values. The peak isometric force generated by each of the 5 nonvolitional contractions was recorded, along with the maximal charge per burst tolerated by each subject. Force generated was described as percentage of MVIC. Efficiency was the amount of force per burst charge.

Results:

The mean MVIC achieved by the subjects was 553.8 newtons (N). The average force per burst charge generated at 10% burst duty cycle was 132.9 N; at 30%, 104.2 N; at 50%, 93.1 N; at 70%, 52.9 N; and at 90%, 41.3 N. The average efficiency (force per millicoulombs [mC]) at 10% burst duty cycle was the highest at 6.49 N/mC and at 90% was the lowest at 1.05 N/mC.

Conclusions:

A burst duty cycle of 10% was the most efficient ratio of burst duration to interburst interval duration for eliciting the strongest muscle contraction. Use of this preferred duty cycle enabled only 8 of 48 subjects (16.6%) to achieve 60% MVIC within 1 trial in 1 session of NMES. Twenty-five subjects (52.0%) were able to achieve at least 10% of the MVIC in the same trial period.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.1M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Snyder-Mackler L, De Luca PF, Williams PR, Eastlack ME, Bartolozzi AR., 3rd Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Apr;76(4):555–560. [PubMed]
  • Delitto A, McKowen JM, McCarthy JA, Shively RA, Rose SJ. Electrically elicited co-contraction of thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A description and single-case experiment. Phys Ther. 1988 Jan;68(1):45–50. [PubMed]
  • Laughman RK, Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Chao EY. Strength changes in the normal quadriceps femoris muscle as a result of electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 1983 Apr;63(4):494–499. [PubMed]
  • Sinacore DR, Delitto A, King DS, Rose SJ. Type II fiber activation with electrical stimulation: a preliminary report. Phys Ther. 1990 Jul;70(7):416–422. [PubMed]
  • Delitto A, Rose SJ. Comparative comfort of three waveforms used in electrically eliciting quadriceps femoris muscle contractions. Phys Ther. 1986 Nov;66(11):1704–1707. [PubMed]
  • McDonnell MK, Delitto A, Sinacore DR, Rose SJ. Electrically elicited fatigue test of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Description and reliability. Phys Ther. 1987 Jun;67(6):941–945. [PubMed]
  • Delitto A, Rose SJ, McKowen JM, Lehman RC, Thomas JA, Shively RA. Electrical stimulation versus voluntary exercise in strengthening thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Phys Ther. 1988 May;68(5):660–663. [PubMed]
  • Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Stralka SW, Bailey SL. Use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 1994 Oct;74(10):901–907. [PubMed]
  • Snyder-Mackler L, Binder-Macleod SA, Williams PR. Fatigability of human quadriceps femoris muscle following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jul;25(7):783–789. [PubMed]
  • Delitto A, Strube MJ, Shulman AD, Minor SD. A study of discomfort with electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 1992 Jun;72(6):410–424. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Athletic Training are provided here courtesy of National Athletic Trainers Association