PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jathtrainLink to Publisher's site
 
J Athl Train. 1992; 27(4): 355–359.
PMCID: PMC1317288

A Comparison of Skin Interface Temperature Response Between the ProHeat Instant Reusable Hot Pack and the Standard Hydrocollator Steam Pack

Donald Tomaszewski, MS, ATC, Michael J. Dandorph, BS, ATC, and James Manning, PhD, ATC

Abstract

The ProHeat reusable hot pack is being used increasingly as a substitute for the standard hydrocollator steam pack. This study evaluated the effects of these two modalities on skin temperature. Seventeen subjects were studied during separate 30-minute applications of a ProHeat pack with a wet barrier, a ProHeat pack with a dry barrier, a hydrocollator pack, and a control pack on their nondominant calf. We measured the skin interface temperature and pack surface temperature during each application with surface thermocouples. The skin interface temperature rise time to the minimum therapeutic temperature (104°F) and the total time at and above the minimum therapeutic temperature, for each application, were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures (p<.05). The ProHeat pack application, with one layer of wet toweling as a barrier, was not significantly different from the hydrocollator steam pack application. We conclude that the ProHeat pack, prepared with a wet barrier, can be considered a viable alternative to the standard hydrocollator steam pack.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • ABRAMSON DI, MITCHELL RE, TUCK S, Jr, BELL Y, ZAYS AM. Changes in blood flow, oxygen uptake and tissue temperatures produced by the topical application of wet heat. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961 May;42:305–318. [PubMed]
  • Barcroft H, Edholm OG. The effect of temperature on blood flow and deep temperature in the human forearm. J Physiol. 1943 Jun 30;102(1):5–20. [PubMed]
  • CROCKFORD GW, HELLON RF. Vascular responses of human skin to infra-red radiation. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:424–432. [PubMed]
  • Downey JA, Darling RC, Miller JM. The effects, of heat, cold, and exercise on the peripheral circulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968 Jun;49(6):308–314. [PubMed]
  • ERDMAN WJ, 2nd, STONER EK. Comparative heating effects of moistaire and hydrocollator hot packs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1956 Feb;37(2):71–74. [PubMed]
  • Greenberg RS. The effects of hot packs and exercise on local blood flow. Phys Ther. 1972 Mar;52(3):273–278. [PubMed]
  • Knight KL, Londeree BR. Comparison of blood flow in the ankle of uninjured subjects during therapeutic applications of heat, cold, and exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980 Spring;12(1):76–80. [PubMed]
  • KRUSEN EM, Jr, WAKIM KG, et al. Effect of hot packs on peripheral circulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1950 Mar;31(3):145–150. [PubMed]
  • Lehmann JF, Silverman DR, Baum BA, Kirk NL, Johnston VC. Temperature distributions in the human thigh, produced by infrared, hot pack and microwave applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1966 May;47(5):291–299. [PubMed]
  • Lehmann JF, Warren CG, Scham SM. Therapeutic heat and cold. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974 Mar-Apr;(99):207–245. [PubMed]
  • RANDALL BF, IMIG CJ, HINES HM. Effects of some physical therapies on blood flow. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1952 Feb;33(2):73–81. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Athletic Training are provided here courtesy of National Athletic Trainers Association