Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 January; 53(486): 26–30.
PMCID: PMC1314488

Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain.


BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care. AIM: To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement, and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68% female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997. At the first visit, patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis. METHOD: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being 'put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement. RESULTS: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23% of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list. Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures. A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76%) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95%). CONCLUSION: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance--a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Birrell F, Johnell O, Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Sep;58(9):569–572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fox KM, Hochberg MC, Resnik CS, Kenzora JE, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Hudson J, Magaziner J. Severity of radiographic findings in hip osteoarthritis associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;23(4):693–697. [PubMed]
  • Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C, Hosie G, Macfarlane GJ, Silman A. Radiographic change is common in new presenters in primary care with hip pain. PCR Hip Study Group. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000 Jul;39(7):772–775. [PubMed]
  • Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C, Hosie G, Macfarlane G, Silman A. Health impact of pain in the hip region with and without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis: a study of new attenders to primary care. The PCR Hip Study Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Nov;59(11):857–863. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Birrell F, Croft P, Cooper C, Hosie G, Macfarlane G, Silman A. Predicting radiographic hip osteoarthritis from range of movement. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001 May;40(5):506–512. [PubMed]
  • Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed]
  • Croft PR, Nahit ES, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ. Interobserver reliability in measuring flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation of the hip using a plurimeter. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 May;55(5):320–323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Croft P, Cooper C, Coggon D. Case definition of hip osteoarthritis in epidemiologic studies. J Rheumatol. 1994 Apr;21(4):591–592. [PubMed]
  • Lee KL, Harrell FE, Jr, Tolley HD, Rosati RA. A comparison of test statistics for assessing the effects of concomitant variables in survival analysis. Biometrics. 1983 Jun;39(2):341–350. [PubMed]
  • Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Frankel S, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Chan P, Peters TJ, Donovan J, Smith GD, Dieppe P. Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 1999 Apr 17;353(9161):1304–1309. [PubMed]
  • Vinciguerra C, Gueguen A, Revel M, Heuleu JN, Amor B, Dougados M. Predictors of the need for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1995 Oct;62(9):563–570. [PubMed]
  • Dent TH, Cunningham SL, Hook WE, Morris RJ, Sylvester NC. The MODEL project: a scoring system to manage demand for cataract and joint replacement surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):917–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners