PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 August; 50(457): 640–644.
PMCID: PMC1313775

Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for the management of low back pain have been published in the past decade, there is potential for further improvement in back pain care. AIM: To document the management of non-specific low back pain by general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands, to determine how this management of care is related to patient and physician factors, and to explore possible reasons for not adhering to the guidelines. METHOD: A prospective study was set up in which 57 GPs in 30 general practices completed a computerised questionnaire after each consultation for low back pain during a four-month period. RESULTS: Of 1640 back pain contacts, 1180 referred to non-specific low back pain. Diagnostic tests were ordered in 2% of first consultations and in 7% of follow-up consultations within one episode. The advice to stay active despite pain was given in 76% and 69% of these cases respectively. Patients were prescribed an analgesic in 53% and 41% of cases respectively (mainly NSAIDs [80%]). Patients were referred to a physiotherapist in 22% of first and in 50% of follow-up consultations. Older patients were physically examined less often, prescribed analgesics more often, and were told less often that staying active could benefit them. The advice to remain active was omitted more often when symptoms lasted longer. Only a small part of the variance in management was accounted for by patient characteristics or by differences between practices. CONCLUSION: The management of low back pain met the guidelines to a large extent. Management decisions were often related to characteristics in which the guidelines lack differentiation. Important reasons for non-adherence were perceived patients' preferences. Further implementation of guidelines will be difficult unless doctors' and patients' views are more explicitly known.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (48K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Croft PR, Macfarlane GJ, Papageorgiou AC, Thomas E, Silman AJ. Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study. BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1356–1359. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Burton AK, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines in the management of low back pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;12(1):17–35. [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA. Acute low back pain: a new paradigm for management. BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1343–1344. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battié M, Street J, Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1021–1029. [PubMed]
  • Ernst E, Assendelft WJ. Chiropractic for low back pain. We don't know whether it does more good than harm. BMJ. 1998 Jul 18;317(7152):160–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Skelton AM, Murphy EA, Murphy RJ, O'Dowd TC. General practitioner perceptions of low back pain patients. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):44–48. [PubMed]
  • Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Wheeler K, Ciol MA. Physician views about treating low back pain. The results of a national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Jan 1;20(1):1–10. [PubMed]
  • Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S. Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Apr;10(2):83–91. [PubMed]
  • Skelton AM, Murphy EA, Murphy RJ, O'Dowd TC. Patients' views of low back pain and its management in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):153–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Szpalski M, Nordin M, Skovron ML, Melot C, Cukier D. Health care utilization for low back pain in Belgium. Influence of sociocultural factors and health beliefs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Feb 15;20(4):431–442. [PubMed]
  • Little P, Smith L, Cantrell T, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R. General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):485–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):418–423. [PubMed]
  • Frankel BS, Moffett JK, Keen S, Jackson D. Guidelines for low back pain: changes in GP management. Fam Pract. 1999 Jun;16(3):216–222. [PubMed]
  • Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 5;333(14):913–917. [PubMed]
  • Van Boven K, Dijksterhuis P, Lamberts H. Defensive testing in Dutch family practice. Is the grass greener on the other side of the ocean? J Fam Pract. 1997 May;44(5):468–472. [PubMed]
  • Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):858–861. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners