PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of westjmedLink to Publisher's site
 
West J Med. 1996 November; 165(5): 294–300.
PMCID: PMC1303846

Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.

Abstract

Surgical resection is the only possibly curative treatment of malignant pancreatic neoplasms, but major pancreatic resection for cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the relation between hospital volume and outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy in California. Data were obtained from reports submitted to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development by all California hospitals from 1990 through 1994. Patient abstracts were analyzed for each of 1,705 patients who underwent major pancreatic resection for malignancy. Of the 298 reporting hospitals, 88% treated fewer than 2 patients per year; these low-volume centers treated the majority of patients. High-volume providers had significantly decreased operative mortality, complication-associated mortality, patient resource use, and total charges and were more likely than low-volume centers to discharge patients to home. These differences were not accounted for by patient mix. This study supports the concept of regionalizing high risk procedures in general surgery, such as major pancreatic resection for cancer.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.9M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Montgomery S. Cancer statistics, 1994. CA Cancer J Clin. 1994 Jan-Feb;44(1):7–26. [PubMed]
  • Lansing PB, Blalock JB, Ochsner JL. Pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective review 1949 to 1969. Am Surg. 1972 Feb;38(2):79–86. [PubMed]
  • Aston SJ, Longmire WP., Jr Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Twenty years' experience. Arch Surg. 1973 Jun;106(6):813–817. [PubMed]
  • Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 1993 May;217(5):430–438. [PubMed]
  • Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg. 1987 Sep;206(3):358–365. [PubMed]
  • Geer RJ, Brennan MF. Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 1993 Jan;165(1):68–73. [PubMed]
  • Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins RK, DenBesten L, Longmire WP., Jr Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 1986 Jan;151(1):141–149. [PubMed]
  • Pellegrini CA, Heck CF, Raper S, Way LW. An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 1989 Jul;124(7):778–781. [PubMed]
  • Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990 Apr;211(4):447–458. [PubMed]
  • Jonasson O, Kwakwa F, Sheldon GF. Calculating the workforce in general surgery. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):731–734. [PubMed]
  • Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. [PubMed]
  • Fowles J, Bunker JP, Schurman DJ. Hip surgery data yield quality indicators. Bus Health. 1987 Jun;4(8):44–46. [PubMed]
  • Showstack JA, Rosenfeld KE, Garnick DW, Luft HS, Schaffarzick RW, Fowles J. Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations. JAMA. 1987 Feb 13;257(6):785–789. [PubMed]
  • Hannan EL, O'Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989 Jul 28;262(4):503–510. [PubMed]
  • Laffel GL, Barnett AI, Finkelstein S, Kaye MP. The relation between experience and outcome in heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 22;327(17):1220–1225. [PubMed]
  • Hughes RG, Garnick DW, Luft HS, McPhee SJ, Hunt SS. Hospital volume and patient outcomes. The case of hip fracture patients. Med Care. 1988 Nov;26(11):1057–1067. [PubMed]
  • Grumbach K, Anderson GM, Luft HS, Roos LL, Brook R. Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. JAMA. 1995 Oct 25;274(16):1282–1288. [PubMed]
  • Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995 Jan;221(1):43–49. [PubMed]
  • Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):638–645. [PubMed]
  • Wade TP, el-Ghazzawy AG, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. The Whipple resection for cancer in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals. Ann Surg. 1995 Mar;221(3):241–248. [PubMed]
  • Horbar JD, Leahy KA. An assessment of data quality in the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network database. Control Clin Trials. 1995 Feb;16(1):51–61. [PubMed]
  • Green J, Wintfeld N, Sharkey P, Passman LJ. The importance of severity of illness in assessing hospital mortality. JAMA. 1990 Jan 12;263(2):241–246. [PubMed]
  • Lloyd SS, Rissing JP. Physician and coding errors in patient records. JAMA. 1985 Sep 13;254(10):1330–1336. [PubMed]
  • Janes RH, Jr, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, Winchester DP, Ocwieja KC, Karnell JH, Clive RE, Menck HR. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg. 1996 Mar;223(3):261–272. [PubMed]

Articles from The Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group