Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
J R Soc Med. 1998 October; 91(10): 528–530.
PMCID: PMC1296911

Consent obtained by the junior house officer--is it informed?


Of 30 junior house officers questioned, 21 had obtained patients' consent for colonoscopy. Of these 21, about one-third did not routinely discuss with patients the risks of perforation and haemorrhage. Ideally, consent should be obtained by a person capable of performing the procedure. If it is to be obtained by junior house officers, they need to know exactly what must be disclosed about each procedure. This could easily be done as part of the induction package.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (279K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Graham G, Robinson T. Suspension of consultant raises serious issues. BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1677–1677. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Garbay JR, Suc B, Rotman N, Fourtanier G, Escat J. Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):42–44. [PubMed]
  • Carr I. Lack of consent and misconduct. Lancet. 1998 May 23;351(9115):1592–1592. [PubMed]
  • Doyal L, Gillon R. Medical ethics and law as a core subject in medical education. A core curriculum offers flexibility in how it is taught-but not that it is taught. BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1623–1624. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press