Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
J R Soc Med. 1995 May; 88(5): 268–271.
PMCID: PMC1295197

Improving the quality of cancer registration data.


Cancer registration is an essential element of any cancer control strategy. Data quality is, however, of paramount importance. This paper sets out some of the ways in which the quality of cancer registration data might be improved. In particular, the potential contribution of clinicians and pathologists is highlighted.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (581K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Wagner G. Cancer registration: historical aspects. IARC Sci Publ. 1985;(66):3–12. [PubMed]
  • Boyle P. Relative value of incidence and mortality data in cancer research. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1989;114:41–63. [PubMed]
  • Muir CS, Démaret E, Boyle P. The cancer registry in cancer control: an overview. IARC Sci Publ. 1985;(66):13–26. [PubMed]
  • Joslin CA. National cancer control and cancer registration. Br J Cancer. 1990 Dec;62(6):882–882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Skeet RG. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Quality and quality control. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(95):101–107. [PubMed]
  • Donaldson L. Registering a need. BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):597–598. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stiller CA. Cancer registration: its uses in research, and confidentiality in the EC. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Oct;47(5):342–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldberg J, Gelfand HM, Levy PS. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210–220. [PubMed]
  • Silcocks PB, Thornton-Jones H, Skeet RG. Making cancer statistics more informative: measures of the quality of recorded diagnosis in a population-based registry. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 Oct;25(10):1467–1473. [PubMed]
  • Weddell JM. Registers and registries: a review. Int J Epidemiol. 1973 Autumn;2(3):221–228. [PubMed]
  • Alexander F, Ricketts TJ, McKinney PA, Cartwright RA. Cancer registration of leukaemias and lymphomas: results of a comparison with a specialist registry. Community Med. 1989 May;11(2):81–89. [PubMed]
  • Villard-Mackintosh L, Coleman MP, Vessey MP. The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study. Br J Cancer. 1988 Oct;58(4):507–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Berkel J. General practitioners and completeness of cancer registry. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Jun;44(2):121–124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schouten LJ, Höppener P, van den Brandt PA, Knottnerus JA, Jager JJ. Completeness of cancer registration in Limburg, The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):369–376. [PubMed]
  • Silcocks PB, Thornton-Jones H, Skeet RG. Can we achieve 100% ascertainment in cancer registration? Public Health. 1989 Jan;103(1):23–30. [PubMed]
  • Brewster D, Crichton J, Muir C. How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data? Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):954–959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Muir CS, Percy C. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Classification and coding of neoplasms. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(95):64–81. [PubMed]
  • Codling BW, Pheby D, Hagen DL, Duffin MF. Cancer registration by linking pathology and district PAS data. Br J Cancer. 1990 Aug;62(2):271–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lapham R, Waugh NR. An audit of the quality of cancer registration data. Br J Cancer. 1992 Sep;66(3):552–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kee F, Gorman D, Odling-Smee W. Confidence intervals and interval cancers ... needles and haystacks? Public Health. 1992 Jan;106(1):29–35. [PubMed]
  • Polissar L, Feigl P, Lane WW, Glaefke G, Dahlberg S. Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984 May;72(5):1007–1014. [PubMed]
  • Ferguson A, Murchison J, Barton JR. Coding of clinical diagnoses. Clerical and medical errors contribute to inaccuracy. BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1541–1541. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Freedman LS. Variations in the level of reporting by hospitals to a regional cancer registry. Br J Cancer. 1978 May;37(5):861–865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hourani LL, Jakowatz J, Goodman M, Mueller G, Brodie G, Jaffery A. Concordance of hospital cancer registry- and physician-collected data for patients with melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Nov 18;84(22):1749–1750. [PubMed]
  • Schouten LJ, Jager JJ, van den Brandt PA. Quality of cancer registry data: a comparison of data provided by clinicians with those of registration personnel. Br J Cancer. 1993 Nov;68(5):974–977. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Joishy SK, Driscol JC. The ailments of cancer registries: a proposal for remedial education. J Cancer Educ. 1989;4(1):17–31. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press