Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
J R Soc Med. 1995 January; 88(1): 20–23.
PMCID: PMC1295068

Accuracy of duplex versus angiography in patients undergoing carotid surgery.


The operative findings of 23 carotid arteries were compared with pre-operative duplex scans and angiography. Both duplex and angiography had a high degree of accuracy in detecting haemodynamically significant lesions of 50-99% (88 and 92%, respectively). Their accuracy, however, in correctly predicting the grade of stenosis was significantly lower; 30 and 48%, respectively (P < 0.001). They each exhibited an accuracy of 70% and 78%, respectively, in the detection of ulceration. Overall, both duplex and angiography displayed an accuracy of 87% in indicating the proper management course. The combination of both investigations increased this accuracy to 94.6%. In severely stenotic lesions, duplex to rule out occlusion was not reliable. On statistical analysis, there was no difference between duplex and angiography in predicting haemodynamically significant lesions of 50-99%, estimating the grade of stenosis, the detection of ulceration, or indicating the proper management course. In most situations, duplex alone equalled the accuracy of angiography in the pre-operative assessment of patients for carotid surgery. For stenotic lesions of > 90%, however, we recommend supplemental angiography to rule out occlusion.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (708K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hertzer NR, Flanagan RA, Jr, Beven EG, O'Hara PJ. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis. 290 patients documented by intravenous angiography. Ann Surg. 1986 Aug;204(2):163–171. [PubMed]
  • Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Jager KA, Primozich JF, Beach KW, Phillips DJ, Strandness DE., Jr The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. Stroke. 1984 Jul-Aug;15(4):605–613. [PubMed]
  • Sterpetti AV, Schultz RD, Feldhaus RJ. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis on the side contralateral to endarterectomy. A comparison between patients with and those without operation. J Vasc Surg. 1988 Oct;8(4):453–459. [PubMed]
  • Moore DJ, Miles RD, Gooley NA, Sumner DS. Noninvasive assessment of stroke risk in asymptomatic and nonhemispheric patients with suspected carotid disease. Five-year follow-up of 294 unoperated and 81 operated patients. Ann Surg. 1985 Oct;202(4):491–504. [PubMed]
  • Moore DJ, Sheehan MP, Kolm P, Russell JB, Sumner DS. Are strokes predictable with noninvasive methods: a five-year follow-up of 303 unoperated patients. J Vasc Surg. 1985 Sep;2(5):654–660. [PubMed]
  • Busuttil RW, Baker JD, Davidson RK, Machleder HI. Carotid artery stenosis - hemodynamic significance and clinical course. JAMA. 1981 Apr 10;245(14):1438–1441. [PubMed]
  • Faught E, Trader SD, Hanna GR. Cerebral complications of angiography for transient ischemia and stroke: prediction of risk. Neurology. 1979 Jan;29(1):4–15. [PubMed]
  • Goodson SF, Flanigan DP, Bishara RA, Schuler JJ, Kikta MJ, Meyer JP. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms? J Vasc Surg. 1987 Apr;5(4):551–557. [PubMed]
  • Roussel L, Steyaert L, Meeus L, Vandevoorde P, Devos V, Pattyn G. Duplex-sonography of the cervical carotid artery. Part II: Confrontation with angiography. Criteria for flow-restrictive stenosis. J Belge Radiol. 1988;71(5):589–600. [PubMed]
  • Farmilo RW, Scott DJ, Cole SE, Jeans WD, Horrocks M. Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 1990 Apr;77(4):388–390. [PubMed]
  • Hansen F, Bergqvist D, Eriksson A, Maly P, Takolander R. Evaluation of ulceration in the extracranial carotid artery with ultrasonography: a comparison with arteriography. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1989 Oct;3(5):443–448. [PubMed]
  • Bornstein NM, Beloev ZG, Norris JW. The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound. Ann Surg. 1988 Mar;207(3):315–317. [PubMed]
  • Moore WS, Ziomek S, Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, Machleder HI, Busuttil RW, Baker JD. Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for arteriography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease? Ann Surg. 1988 Jul;208(1):91–94. [PubMed]
  • Croft RJ, Ellam LD, Harrison MJ. Accuracy of carotid angiography in the assessment of atheroma of the internal carotid artery. Lancet. 1980 May 10;1(8176):997–1000. [PubMed]
  • Little JR, Furlan AJ, Modic MT, Weinstein MA. Digital subtraction angiography in cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1982 Sep-Oct;13(5):557–566. [PubMed]
  • Goldstein SJ, Fried AM, Young B, Tibbs PA. Limited usefulness of aortic arch angiography in the evaluation of carotid occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jan;138(1):103–108. [PubMed]
  • O'Donnell TF, Jr, Erdoes L, Mackey WC, McCullough J, Shepard A, Heggerick P, Isner J, Callow AD. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):443–449. [PubMed]
  • Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1988 Nov-Dec;29(6):676–681. [PubMed]
  • Crew JR, Dean M, Johnson JM, Knighton D, Bashour TT, Ellertson D, Hanna ES. Carotid surgery without angiography. Am J Surg. 1984 Aug;148(2):217–220. [PubMed]
  • Thomas GI, Jones TW, Stavney LS, Manhas DR, Spencer MP. Carotid endarterectomy after Doppler ultrasonographic examination without angiography. Am J Surg. 1986 May;151(5):616–619. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press