Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
J R Soc Med. 1994 September; 87(9): 523–525.
PMCID: PMC1294769

A comparison of the attitudes shown by general practitioners, hospital doctors and medical students towards alternative medicine.


The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the views of general practitioners (GPs), hospital doctors and medical students to alternative medicine. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 100 GPs and 100 hospital doctors in the South West Thames Regional Health Authority (SWTRHA). A convenience sample of 237 pre-clinical medical students at St George's Hospital Medical School was also given a questionnaire. Eighty-seven GPs and 81 hospital doctors replied. Five therapies were investigated: acupuncture; chiropractice; homeopathy; naturopathy; and osteopathy. All respondents were asked about their attitude towards and knowledge of these therapies. Doctors were asked how often they referred patients for such treatment and whether they practised it themselves. GPs and hospital doctors had similar levels of knowledge of the therapies. Medical students were the least informed but the most enthusiastic respondents. Seventy per cent of hospital doctors and 93% of GPs had, on at least one occasion, suggested a referral for alternative treatment. GPs were making these referrals more frequently and earlier. Twelve per cent of hospital doctors and 20% of GPs were practising alternative medicine. The majority of the respondents felt that alternative medicine should be available on the National Health Service (NHS) and that medical students should receive some tuition about alternative therapies. A considerable proportion of those doctors referring patients to alternative practitioners were ignorant of their official qualifications.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (606K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ernst E. From alternative to complementary: changing the view on the fringe. Br J Hosp Med. 50(6):299–300. [PubMed]
  • Reilly DT. Young doctors' views on alternative medicine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):337–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wharton R, Lewith G. Complementary medicine and the general practitioner. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 7;292(6534):1498–1500. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson E, Anderson P. General practitioners and alternative medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Feb;37(295):52–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Himmel W, Schulte M, Kochen MM. Complementary medicine: are patients' expectations being met by their general practitioners? Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):232–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pietroni PC. Beyond the boundaries: relationship between general practice and complementary medicine. BMJ. 1992 Sep 5;305(6853):564–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lowry S. Curriculum design. BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1409–1411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Maxwell RJ. The Osteopaths Bill. BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1556–1557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Meade TW, Dyer S, Browne W, Townsend J, Frank AO. Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431–1437. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316–323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Knipschild P. Trials and errors. BMJ. 1993 Jun 26;306(6894):1706–1707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press