PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
 
J R Soc Med. 1993 February; 86(2): 79–82.
PMCID: PMC1293854

Evaluating the breast screening programme: the need for surgical audit.

Abstract

It is to be anticipated that a reduction in population mortality attributable to mammographic screening would be heralded by an increasing proportion of breast cancer cases diagnosed at earlier stages and by an improvement in case fatality. Few cancer registers routinely produce incidence or survival data by stage at diagnosis and thus improvement in these will be the harder to assess. By thorough casenote review and follow up, this study has determined the usual presentation and survival of breast cancer in Northern Ireland in 1986 before the introduction of screening. Overall, 85% of cases were Manchester stage I or II, figures which accord with other British studies. Five-year survival ranged from 77.8% for stage I (95% confidence limits 71.7%, 82.7%) to 35.7% for stage IV (95% confidence limits 13.0%, 59.4%). Forty-three per cent of cases treated in non-teaching hospitals could not be pathologically staged, more than twice the figure for teaching hospitals (Chi-squared = 15.7, df = 1, P < 0.001). Since many tumours not detected by screening will be treated outside teaching centres, this difference will reduce the statistical power to detect the true shift in stage distribution and improvement in survival from screening. Comprehensive surgical audit would help to resolve the inadequacies in existing data collection and improve the ability to evaluate the outcome of the screening programme.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (696K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Habbema JD, van Oortmarssen GJ, van Putten DJ. An analysis of survival differences between clinically and screen-detected cancer patients. Stat Med. 1983 Apr-Jun;2(2):279–285. [PubMed]
  • Connor RJ, Chu KC, Smart CR. Stage-shift cancer screening model. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(11):1083–1095. [PubMed]
  • Kee F, Gorman D, Odling-Smee W. Confidence intervals and interval cancers ... needles and haystacks? Public Health. 1992 Jan;106(1):29–35. [PubMed]
  • Axillary dissection in breast cancer. Lancet. 1991 Feb 23;337(8739):486–488. [PubMed]
  • Fentiman IS, Mansel RE. The axilla: not a no-go zone. Lancet. 1991 Jan 26;337(8735):221–223. [PubMed]
  • Axillary dissection in breast cancer. Lancet. 1991 Feb 23;337(8739):486–488. [PubMed]
  • Axillary dissection in breast cancer. Lancet. 1991 Feb 23;337(8739):486–488. [PubMed]
  • Goodare H. Adjuvant treatment in breast cancer. Lancet. 1992 Feb 15;339(8790):424–424. [PubMed]
  • Kaplan HS. Adjuvant treatment in breast cancer. Lancet. 1992 Feb 15;339(8790):424–424. [PubMed]
  • Woods WG, Earlam RJ. Breast cancer data collection for surgical audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):364–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Langlands AO, Kerr GR. Prognosis in breast cancer: the relevance of clinical staging. Clin Radiol. 1978 Nov;29(6):599–606. [PubMed]
  • Blamey R. The 1989 Walter Hubert lecture. Does biological understanding influence surgical practice? Br J Cancer. 1989 Sep;60(3):271–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson TJ, Lamb J, Donnan P, Alexander FE, Huggins A, Muir BB, Kirkpatrick AE, Chetty U, Hepburn W, Smith A, et al. Comparative pathology of breast cancer in a randomised trial of screening. Br J Cancer. 1991 Jul;64(1):108–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Paci E, Ciatto S, Buiatti E, Cecchini S, Palli D, Rosselli del Turco M. Early indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence District Programme. Int J Cancer. 1990 Aug 15;46(2):198–202. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press