Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jrsocmedLink to Publisher's site
J R Soc Med. 1987 October; 80(10): 620–623.
PMCID: PMC1291047

Undergraduate clinical neurosciences programme development: a consumer-based evaluation.


Intern responses to a questionnaire were used to evaluate an undergraduate clinical neurosciences programme. The data obtained were judged an authentic measure of instructional efficacy. Most interns rated themselves competent in performing the neurological examination but ill-equipped to interpret their findings and to manage effectively common problems, especially emergencies. Neurological diseases and the non-biomedical aspects of patient care were identified relatively infrequently as matters needing greater emphasis. Explanations for these findings may include a curriculum of traditional format, differences in teaching and assessing theoretical and practical competence, and the typical responsibilities of interns in an academic hospital. Intern evaluation of undergraduate clinical programmes can provide data useful to their development.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (797K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Menken M, Sheps CG. Undergraduate education in the medical specialties: the case of neurology. N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 18;311(16):1045–1048. [PubMed]
  • Murray TJ. Relevance in undergraduate neurological teaching. Can J Neurol Sci. 1977 May;4(2):131–137. [PubMed]
  • Richardson IM. Consumer views on the medical curriculum: a retrospective study of Aberdeen graduates. Med Educ. 1983 Jan;17(1):8–10. [PubMed]
  • Newble DI, Hoare J, Elmslie RG. The validity and reliability of a new examination of the clinical competence of medical students. Med Educ. 1981 Jan;15(1):46–52. [PubMed]
  • Kaisen A, Kjetså GA, Lie RK, Hjetland R, Haaland PT, Møller P, Oulie HE, Tveit T, Maeland JG. Interns' evaluation of their preparation for general practice: a comparison between the University of Tromsø and the University of Bergen. Med Educ. 1984 Sep;18(5):349–354. [PubMed]
  • Woodward CA, Ferrier BM. The content of the medical curriculum at McMaster University: graduates' evaluation of their preparation for postgraduate training. Med Educ. 1983 Jan;17(1):54–60. [PubMed]
  • Simpson CA. A community neurologist's personal viewpoint on neurological training. Can J Neurol Sci. 1977 Nov;4(4):265–268. [PubMed]
  • Murray TJ. Presidential Address: XVIII Canadian Congress of Neurological Sciences. The neurologist as educator. Can J Neurol Sci. 1983 Nov;10(4):230–234. [PubMed]
  • Murray TJ. Concepts in undergraduate neurological teaching. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1977;79(4):273–284. [PubMed]
  • McLeod PJ, Harden RM. Clinical teaching strategies for physicians. Med Teach. 1985;7(2):173–189. [PubMed]
  • Derouesné C, Salamon R. Contemporary teaching of neurology. Teaching neurological behavior to general practitioners: a fresh approach. Med Educ. 1977 Jan;11(1):28–31. [PubMed]
  • Newble DI, Gordon MI. The learning style of medical students. Med Educ. 1985 Jan;19(1):3–8. [PubMed]
  • Gledhill RF, Capatos D. Factors affecting the reliability of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test in neurology. S Afr Med J. 1985 Mar 23;67(12):463–467. [PubMed]
  • Dally P, Ewan C, Pitney WR. Assessment of an Australian medical internship. Med Educ. 1984 May;18(3):181–186. [PubMed]
  • Levitt LP. Neurological education of nonneurologists. Neurology. 1979 Nov;29(11):1514–1516. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press