PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site
 
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 September; 78(2): 127–160.
PMCID: PMC1284892

Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.

Abstract

Killeen and Hall (2001) showed that a common factor called strength underlies the key dependent variables of response probability, latency, and rate, and that overall response rate is a good predictor of strength. In a search for the mechanisms that underlie those correlations, this article shows that (a) the probability of responding on a trial is a two-state Markov process; (b) latency and rate of responding can be described in terms of the probability and period of stochastic machines called clocked Bernoulli modules, and (c) one such machine, the refractory Poisson process, provides a functional relation between the probability of observing a response during any epoch and the rate of responding. This relation is one of proportionality at low rates and curvilinearity at higher rates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (435K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. [PubMed]
  • Bachrach AJ. A simple method of obtaining a scatter distribution of off-key pigeon pecking. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Mar;9(2):152–152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baron A, Herpolsheimer L. Averaging Effects In The Study Of Fixed-ratio Response Patterns. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):145–153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bizo LA, Killeen PR. Models of ratio schedule performance. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jul;23(3):351–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Blough DS. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bower GH. A turning point in mathematical learning theory. Psychol Rev. 1994 Apr;101(2):290–300. [PubMed]
  • Conover Kent L, Fulton Stephanie, Shizgal Peter. Operant tempo varies with reinforcement rate: implications for measurement of reward efficacy. Behav Processes. 2001 Nov 1;56(2):85–101. [PubMed]
  • Gentry GD, Weiss B, Laties VG. The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):327–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ. Formal properties of the matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):159–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Keren G, Teigen KH. The probability-outcome correspondence principle: a dispositional view of the interpretation of probability statements. Mem Cognit. 2001 Oct;29(7):1010–1021. [PubMed]
  • Killeen PR. Incentive theory. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1982;29:169–216. [PubMed]
  • Killeen PR. Writing and overwriting short-term memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):18–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Killeen PR, Hall SS. The principal components of response strength. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Mar;75(2):111–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mazur JE, Hyslop ME. Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):143–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Myerson J, Hale S. Choice in transition: A comparison of melioration and the kinetic model. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):291–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Palya WL. Dynamics in the fine structure of schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):267–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pear JJ. Spatiotemporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):217–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ploog BO, Zeigler HP. Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):21–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • RAY RC, MCGILL W. EFFECTS OF CLASS-INTERVAL SIZE UPON CERTAIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTER-RESPONSE TIMES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:125–127. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • REYNOLDS GS, CATANIA AC. Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:387–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shull RL, Gaynor ST, Grimes JA. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Skinner BF. What is the experimental analysis of behavior? J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):213–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Staddon JE. The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):439–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior