Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brheartjLink to Publisher's site
Br Heart J. 1987 January; 57(1): 32–37.
PMCID: PMC1277143

Relation of human cardiac action potential duration to the interval between beats: implications for the validity of rate corrected QT interval (QTc).


Fourteen patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterisation were paced at a steady frequency; after this test, stimuli were introduced with a variable preceding interval (test pulse interval). The QT interval of the electrocardiogram and the duration of the monophasic action potential of the right ventricle were measured. QT interval is a function of action potential duration; the two variables were very closely correlated in this study. Both these variables increased in duration with increasing test pulse interval. A biphasic response, as previously reported, was not seen. An increase in steady state pacing frequency caused QT interval and action potential duration to decrease for any given R-R interval. When frequency of stimulation was suddenly increased and then maintained, there was an immediate action potential shortening followed by a further more gradual shortening occurring over several minutes. These results imply that a simple correction of QT interval for heart rate (QTc) is inadequate. It is concluded that the relation between action potential duration (or QT interval) and heart rate depends on both the instantaneous interval between beats and the duration of the prevailing heart rate.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (838K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Pidgeon J, Lab M, Seed A, Elzinga G, Papadoyannis D, Noble MI. The contractile state of cat and dog heart in relation to the interval between beats. Circ Res. 1980 Oct;47(4):559–567. [PubMed]
  • Pidgeon J, Miller GA, Noble MI, Papadoyannis D, Seed WA. The relationship between the strength of the human heart beat and the interval between beats. Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7):1404–1410. [PubMed]
  • Bass BG. Restitution of the action potential in cat papillary muscle. Am J Physiol. 1975 Jun;228(6):1717–1724. [PubMed]
  • Boyett MR, Jewell BR. A study of the factors responsible for rate-dependent shortening of the action potential in mammalian ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Dec;285:359–380. [PubMed]
  • Elzinga G, Lab MJ, Noble MI, Papadoyannis DE, Pidgeon J, Seed A, Wohlfart B. The action-potential duration and contractile response of the intact heart related to the preceding interval and the preceding beat in the dog and cat. J Physiol. 1981 May;314:481–500. [PubMed]
  • Franz MR, Schaefer J, Schöttler M, Seed WA, Noble MI. Electrical and mechanical restitution of the human heart at different rates of stimulation. Circ Res. 1983 Dec;53(6):815–822. [PubMed]
  • Attwell D, Cohen I, Eisner DA. The effects of heart rate on the action potential of guinea-pig and human ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1981;313:439–461. [PubMed]
  • Drake AJ, Noble MI, Schouten V, Seed A, Ter Keurs HE, Wohlfart B. Is action potential duration of the intact dog heart related to contractility or stimulus rate? J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:499–510. [PubMed]
  • Franz M, Schöttler M, Schaefer J, Seed WA. Simultaneous recording of monophasic action potentials and contractile force from the human heart. Klin Wochenschr. 1980 Dec 15;58(24):1357–1359. [PubMed]
  • Hausworth O, Noble D, Tsien RW. The dependence of plateau currents in cardiac Purkinje fibres on the interval between action potentials. J Physiol. 1972 Apr;222(1):27–49. [PubMed]
  • Gettes LS, Reuter H. Slow recovery from inactivation of inward currents in mammalian myocardial fibres. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;240(3):703–724. [PubMed]
  • Wohlfart B. Relationships between peak force, action potential duration and stimulus interval in rabbit myocardium. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979 Aug;106(4):395–409. [PubMed]
  • HOFFMAN BF, CRANEFIELD PF, LEPESCHKIN E, SURAWICZ B, HERRLICH HC. Comparison of cardiac monophasic action potentials recorded by intracellular and suction electrodes. Am J Physiol. 1959 Jun;196(6):1297–1301. [PubMed]
  • Boyett MR, Fedida D. Changes in the electrical activity of dog cardiac Purkinje fibres at high heart rates. J Physiol. 1984 May;350:361–391. [PubMed]
  • Kelman AW, Whiting B, Summer DJ. Correction equation for ECG time intervals. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984 Jul;18(1):113–115. [PubMed]
  • Staniforth DH. The QT interval and cycle length: the influence of atropine, hyoscine and exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983 Dec;16(6):615–621. [PubMed]
  • Rickards AF, Norman J. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. New design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J. 1981 Jan;45(1):56–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group