Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of cmajCMAJ Information for AuthorsCMAJ Home Page
CMAJ. 1989 August 15; 141(4): 291–299.
PMCID: PMC1269500

Effect of medicolegal liability on patterns of general and family practice in Canada.


As part of the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Review on Liability and Compensation Issues in Health Care, in 1988 we surveyed Canadian general practitioners and family physicians to determine the effect of liability concerns on their practices in the previous 5 years. Questionnaires were sent to a random, stratified national sample of 1295 physicians, with a response rate of 64.6%. However, a high proportion of the returned questionnaires were ineligible because the physicians were not in general or family practice, were not involved in direct patient care, or had died or moved; thus, the corrected response rate was 50.8%. The newsletter of the Canadian Medical Protective Association was the source of information on liability most frequently cited (by 88.1% of the physicians) and most influential (to 62.4%). Only 15.5% of the physicians cited personal involvement with medicolegal issues as a source of information; the rate was higher for Ontario physicians and those in urban areas generally. A total of 74.6% of the respondents had altered their style of practice in the previous 5 years, and 56.3% reported changes in the scope of their practice. Concern about litigation was the most important reason for changing style of practice and reducing or eliminating administration of anesthesia, whereas lifestyle and other issues along with liability concerns most influenced decisions to reduce obstetric care and emergency department work. Our findings suggest that physicians' perceptions of liability issues have had a profound influence on primary care practice in Canada in the past several years.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Korcok M. When the lawyer is called in your best friend is a good set of records. Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Mar 19;116(6):687–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Geekie DA, Oscapella EL. CMA issues call for action to deal with malpractice insurance "crisis". CMAJ. 1986 Jul 15;135(2):145–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Charles SC, Wilbert JR, Franke KJ. Sued and nonsued physicians' self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation. Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;142(4):437–440. [PubMed]
  • Weisman CS, Morlock LL, Teitelbaum MA, Klassen AC, Celentano DD. Practice changes in response to the malpractice litigation climate. Results of a Maryland physician survey. Med Care. 1989 Jan;27(1):16–24. [PubMed]
  • Smucker DR. Obstetrics in family practice in the state of Ohio. J Fam Pract. 1988 Feb;26(2):165–168. [PubMed]
  • Darnell HL., Jr Current status of family practice obstetrics in Alabama. Ala Med. 1986 Sep;56(3):36–38. [PubMed]
  • Rosenblatt RA, Detering B. Changing patterns of obstetric practice in Washington State: the impact of tort reform. Fam Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;20(2):101–107. [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association