PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cjvetresCVMACanadian Journal of Veterinary ResearchSee also Canadian Journal of Comparative MedicineJournal Web siteHow to Submit
 
Can J Vet Res. 1994 July; 58(3): 173–180.
PMCID: PMC1263692

Evaluation of biocompatible osteoconductive polymer shelf arthroplasty for the surgical correction of hip dysplasia in normal dogs.

Abstract

Biocompatible osteoconductive polymer (BOP) shelf arthroplasty was performed on ten nondysplastic dogs, divided into five groups. Each group was evaluated at 6, 13, 17, 26 or 39 weeks postsurgery. Evaluation consisted of clinical, radiological and histological studies. The dogs were injected with three fluorochrome markers, 28 days, 14 days and 6 hours before euthanasia. Transverse sections of undecalcified arthroplasty site were examined by microradiography and fluorescence microscopy; surface-stained sections were evaluated by light microscopy. The BOP shelf arthroplasty was not technically difficult. Minimal mineralization of the shelf was noted by radiography, 26 and 39 weeks postop. A moderate to large amount of fibrous mature connective tissue was observed around the BOP fibers throughout the study. Bone ingrowth occurred around the BOP fibers, but was minimal within them. This osseous proliferation of the arthroplasty was very slow to take place; it was first noted microscopically 17 weeks postsurgery and was still minimal 39 weeks after surgery. These findings suggest that there may be interference to the osteoconductive properties of BOP by fibrous tissue. Ossification of the shelf arthroplasty was too unsatisfactory to recommend its use for the treatment of canine hip dysplasia.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Riser WH, Cohen D, Lindqvist S, Mansson J, Chen S. Influence of early rapid growth and weight gain on hip dysplasia in the German Shepherd Dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1964 Oct 1;145(7):661–668. [PubMed]
  • Corley EA, Hogan PM. Trends in hip dysplasia control: analysis of radiographs submitted to the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals, 1974 to 1984. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985 Oct 15;187(8):805–809. [PubMed]
  • Corley EA. Hip dysplasia: a report from the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1987 May;2(2):141–151. [PubMed]
  • Henricson B, Norberg I, Olsson SE. On the etiology and pathogenesis of hip dysplasia: a comparative review. J Small Anim Pract. 1966 Nov;7(11):673–688. [PubMed]
  • Lust G, Geary JC, Sheffy BE. Development of hip dysplasia in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1973 Jan;34(1):87–91. [PubMed]
  • Hutt FB. Genetic selection to reduce the incidence of hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1967 Oct 15;151(8):1041–1048. [PubMed]
  • Hedhammar A, Olsson SE, Andersson SA, Persson L, Pettersson L, Olausson A, Sundgren PE. Canine hip dysplasia: study of heritability in 401 litters of German Shepherd dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979 May 1;174(9):1012–1016. [PubMed]
  • Kasström H. Nutrition, weight gain and development of hip dysplasia. An experimental investigation in growing dogs with special reference to the effect of feeding intensity. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1975;344:135–179. [PubMed]
  • Riser WH, Shirer JF. Correlation between canine hip dysplasia and pelvic muscle mass: a study of 95 dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1967 May;28(124):769–777. [PubMed]
  • Smith GK, Biery DN, Gregor TP. New concepts of coxofemoral joint stability and the development of a clinical stress-radiographic method for quantitating hip joint laxity in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Jan 1;196(1):59–70. [PubMed]
  • Lust G, Beilman WT, Rendano VT. A relationship between degree of laxity and synovial fluid volume in coxofemoral joints of dogs predisposed for hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Jan;41(1):55–60. [PubMed]
  • Lust G, Summers BA. Early, asymptomatic stage of degenerative joint disease in canine hip joints. Am J Vet Res. 1981 Nov;42(11):1849–1855. [PubMed]
  • Schrader SC. Triple osteotomy of the pelvis and trochanteric osteotomy as a treatment for hip dysplasia in the immature dog: the surgical technique and results of 77 consecutive operations. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1986 Sep 15;189(6):659–665. [PubMed]
  • Slocum B, Devine T. Pelvic osteotomy in the dog as treatment for hip dysplasia. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1987 May;2(2):107–116. [PubMed]
  • Braden TD, Prieur WD, Kaneene JB. Clinical evaluation of intertrochanteric osteotomy for treatment of dogs with early-stage hip dysplasia: 37 cases (1980-1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Jan 15;196(2):337–341. [PubMed]
  • Duff R, Campbell JR. Effects of experimental excision arthroplasty of the hip joint. Res Vet Sci. 1978 Mar;24(2):174–181. [PubMed]
  • Tarvin G, Lippincott CL. Excision arthroplasty for treatment of canine hip dysplasia using the biceps femoris muscle sling: an evaluation of 92 cases. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1987 May;2(2):158–160. [PubMed]
  • Olmstead ML. Total hip replacement in the dog. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1987 May;2(2):131–140. [PubMed]
  • Schmitt-Fournier JA, Sertl GO, Skondia V. The use of a biocompatible orthopaedic polymer in the treatment of loose total hip prostheses. J Int Med Res. 1989 May-Jun;17(3):254–261. [PubMed]
  • Lozes G, Fawaz A, Cama A, Krivosic I, Devos P, Herlant M, Sertl GO, Clarisse J, Jomin M. Discectomies of the lower cervical spine using interbody biopolymer (B.O.P.) implants. Advantages in the treatment of complicated cervical arthrosis. A review of 150 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989;96(3-4):88–93. [PubMed]
  • Skondia V, Davydov AB, Belykh SI, Heusghem C. Chemical and physicomechanical aspects of biocompatible orthopaedic polymer (BOP) in bone surgery. J Int Med Res. 1987 Sep-Oct;15(5):293–302. [PubMed]
  • Merendino J, Sertl G, Skondia V. Use of biocompatible orthopaedic polymer for fracture treatment and reconstructive orthopaedic procedures. J Int Med Res. 1984;12(6):351–355. [PubMed]
  • Trevor PB, Stevenson S, Carrig CB, Waldron DR, Smith MM. Evaluation of biocompatible osteoconductive polymer as an orthopedic implant in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992 Jun 1;200(11):1651–1660. [PubMed]
  • Martineau-Doize B, Martineau G, Dhem A. Study of the growth of the ventral nasal concha of the piglet by fluorescence Microscopy and Microradiography. Anat Histol Embryol. 1982 Sep;11(3):193–204. [PubMed]
  • Saunders DJ. A new interpretation of structure-function relationships in insulin-receptor interactions. Diabetologia. 1982 Nov;23(5):386–392. [PubMed]
  • Wu SC, Klein CP, van der Lubbe HB, de Groot K, van den Hooff A. Histological evaluation of biocompatible orthopaedic polymer. Biomaterials. 1990 Sep;11(7):491–494. [PubMed]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association