PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 December; 46(413): 727–730.
PMCID: PMC1239862

The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of low back pain patients in general practice differs significantly from that in an orthopaedic clinic. The most frequent specific cause of low back pain is nerve-root irritation or compression caused by intervertebral protrusion, and the diagnosis is still problematic. Testing for Lasègue's sign could be a useful way of detecting high-risk patients, but so far the reproducibility of the test has been measured only in hospital-based studies. AIM: To assess the inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in general practice. METHOD: Fifteen General practitioners from Amsterdam and the surrounding areas tested all consecutive low back pain patients who visited them during a period of two years for Lasègue's sign. The test was repeated within two weeks in two samples: sample I consisted of 50 consecutive low back pain patients; sample II consisted of all patients who had pelvic tilt, scoliosis, or positive Lasègue's sign. RESULTS: In sample I, the observation was repeated in 49 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.33, and the proportions of positive and negative agreement were 33% and 96%, respectively. In sample II, the observation was repeated in 48 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.56, whereas the proportion of positive agreement was 67% and the proportion of negative agreement was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in routine general practice seems to be low, but may be similar to the reproducibility observed in hospital settings in selected patients who have a high chance of low back pain owing to a specific disease.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (871K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992 Aug 12;268(6):760–765. [PubMed]
  • Nachemson AL. Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):8–20. [PubMed]
  • Heliövaara M, Knekt P, Aromaa A. Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(3):251–258. [PubMed]
  • Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):69–73. [PubMed]
  • Sugar O. Charles Lasègue and his 'Considerations on Sciatica'. JAMA. 1985 Mar 22;253(12):1767–1768. [PubMed]
  • O'CONNELL JEA. Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs, a clinical review based on five hundred cases treated by excision of the protrusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 Feb;33-B(1):8–30. [PubMed]
  • van den Hoogen HM, Koes BW, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM. On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Feb 1;20(3):318–327. [PubMed]
  • Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Sep 25;293(13):642–646. [PubMed]
  • Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Oct 2;293(14):695–701. [PubMed]
  • Waddell G, Main CJ, Morris EW, Venner RM, Rae PS, Sharmy SH, Galloway H. Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 22;284(6328):1519–1523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McCombe PF, Fairbank JC, Cockersole BC, Pynsent PB. 1989 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989 Sep;14(9):908–918. [PubMed]
  • Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. [PubMed]
  • Knottnerus JA, Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143–1154. [PubMed]
  • Porter RW, Trailescu IF. Diurnal changes in straight leg raising. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990 Feb;15(2):103–106. [PubMed]
  • Seigel DG, Podgor MJ, Remaley NA. Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Mar 1;135(5):571–578. [PubMed]
  • Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543–549. [PubMed]
  • Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551–558. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners