Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 November; 46(412): 661–663.
PMCID: PMC1239820

Same information, different decisions: the influence of evidence on the management of hypertension in the elderly.


BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine requires general practitioners (GPs) to act upon the results of clinical trials. Clinical trial evidence may be difficult to understand and apply in practice. AIM: To investigate whether GPs were unduly influenced in managing hypertension in the elderly by the ways in which benefits of trial results were presented, and to establish whether their current treatment of an elderly hypertensive patient was broadly in line with recent clinical trial evidence. METHOD: Seventy-three GPs attending a refresher course were given a written questionnaire containing data from one clinical trial of treatment of hypertension in the elderly presented in four different ways (absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, difference in event-free patients, and number of patients who had to be treated in order to prevent one clinical event), as if from four different trials. The effect of each presentation on treatment preferences was assessed using Likert scales. The results were analysed to determine whether the method of presentation of results influenced decision making. A clinical scenario was presented to investigate their current treatment preferences in an elderly hypertensive. RESULTS: All GPs returned completed questionnaires. Relative risk reduction was the only presentation which was significantly different from the others, and was the most likely to influence prescribing. In free-text comments, 75% of GPs admitted having problems understanding statistics commonly found in medical journals. More than 90% conformed with recent clinical trial evidence for the management of hypertension. CONCLUSION: GPs were most influenced by relative risk reduction, and were unaware of how the presentation of research results could affect treatment decisions. Most GPs freely admitted to difficulty in comprehending medical statistics. Almost all of the GPs expressed treatment decisions which were broadly in line with clinical evidence.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (647K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1122–1126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, Smith R. Evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1085–1086. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sackett DL, Cook RJ. Understanding clinical trials. BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):755–756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fahey T, Newton J. Conveying the benefits and risks of treatment. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jul;45(396):339–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Naylor CD, Chen E, Strauss B. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann Intern Med. 1992 Dec 1;117(11):916–921. [PubMed]
  • Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med. 1992 Feb;92(2):121–124. [PubMed]
  • Bobbio M, Demichelis B, Giustetto G. Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribe. Lancet. 1994 May 14;343(8907):1209–1211. [PubMed]
  • Bucher HC, Weinbacher M, Gyr K. Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration. BMJ. 1994 Sep 24;309(6957):761–764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jackson R, Barham P, Bills J, Birch T, McLennan L, MacMahon S, Maling T. Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document. BMJ. 1993 Jul 10;307(6896):107–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sever P, Beevers G, Bulpitt C, Lever A, Ramsay L, Reid J, Swales J. Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society. BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):983–987. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Beard K, Bulpitt C, Mascie-Taylor H, O'Malley K, Sever P, Webb S. Management of elderly patients with sustained hypertension. BMJ. 1992 Feb 15;304(6824):412–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488–1492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Peckham M. Filling the lacuna between research and practice: an interview with Michael Peckham. Interview by Richard Smith. BMJ. 1993 Nov 27;307(6916):1403–1407. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dickerson JE, Brown MJ. Influence of age on general practitioners' definition and treatment of hypertension. BMJ. 1995 Mar 4;310(6979):574–574. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. [PubMed]
  • McCormick J. The place of judgement in medicine. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):50–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Charlton BG. Management of science. Lancet. 1993 Jul 10;342(8863):99–100. [PubMed]
  • Martin R, Hilton S, Kerry S. Review of prescribed treatment for children with asthma. More recent data suggest guidelines are being adhered to. BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1645–1645. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith R. Towards a knowledge based health service. BMJ. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):217–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners