PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 October; 46(411): 595–599.
PMCID: PMC1239784

A general practice records audit of the process of care for people with epilepsy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The appropriateness of epilepsy as a topic for general practice audit activity has been emphasized, but few audits have been undertaken to data and those that have are small scale. Historically, management of epilepsy has been a neglected area, and services for people with epilepsy remain generally poor. AIM: The study was designed to examine the process of care for people with epilepsy through a region-wide audit of general practitioner records. METHOD: General practitioners in 31 randomly selected general practices in one UK health region undertook a notes audit for all patients identified as having active epilepsy (patients who had had seizures in the last 2 years, or were currently seizure-free but on antiepileptic medication). A standard pro forma was used to collect information relating to diagnosis, drug treatment, and primary and secondary care contacts. RESULTS: Recording of information in the notes was generally good, but poor for some key items essential to the effective management of the condition; results suggest that a number of recommendations about provision of care for epilepsy are not being met: in particular, EEG and CT investigations often appear poorly directed; prescribed antiepileptic therapy is not always optimal; significant numbers of patients are being treated in hospital by non-neurologists; there is little evidence of any regular review being undertaken by general practitioners of their patients with epilepsy; and counselling about the non-clinical aspects of epilepsy often appears inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations in a number of recent reports, gaps and inconsistencies in epilepsy care persist, both at the primary and secondary level. The means by which such shortcomings can be reduced (e.g. by specialist epilepsy nurses working across the primary-secondary care interface) should now be systematically examined. The study has highlighted a need for evidence-based guidelines which span the primary-secondary care interface and clarify the contribution of the various practitioners involved in the provision of care for people with epilepsy.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Brown S, Betts T, Chadwick D, Hall B, Shorvon S, Wallace S. An epilepsy needs document. Seizure. 1993 Jun;2(2):91–103. [PubMed]
  • Taylor MP. Epilepsy care: a need for change. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Sep;44(386):386–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jones AL. Medical audit of the care of patients with epilepsy in one group practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Jul;30(216):396–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Burton MH, Williams DR. Treatment and follow-up of patients with epilepsy in two general practices. Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;3(4):235–239. [PubMed]
  • Taylor MP. Epilepsy in a Doncaster practice: audit and change over eight years. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Mar;37(296):116–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Presley P. An audit of epilepsy in general practice. Practitioner. 1989 Jul 8;233(1472):1009–1014. [PubMed]
  • Jacoby A, Baker GA, Steen N, Potts P, Chadwick DW. The clinical course of epilepsy and its psychosocial correlates: findings from a U.K. Community study. Epilepsia. 1996 Feb;37(2):148–161. [PubMed]
  • Goodridge DM, Shorvon SD. Epileptic seizures in a population of 6000. I: Demography, diagnosis and classification, and role of the hospital services. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Sep 3;287(6393):641–644. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sander JW, Hart YM, Johnson AL, Shorvon SD. National General Practice Study of Epilepsy: newly diagnosed epileptic seizures in a general population. Lancet. 1990 Nov 24;336(8726):1267–1271. [PubMed]
  • Ridsdale L. Matching the needs with skills in epilepsy care. BMJ. 1995 May 13;310(6989):1219–1220. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Freeman GK, Richards SC. Personal continuity and the care of patients with epilepsy in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Sep;44(386):395–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hjortdahl P, Borchgrevink CF. Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations. BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1181–1184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sweeney KG, Gray DP. Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner--are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):133–135. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hart YM, Shorvon SD. The nature of epilepsy in the general population. II. Medical care. Epilepsy Res. 1995 May;21(1):51–58. [PubMed]
  • Chadwick D. Epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;57(3):264–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ridsdale L, Robins D, Fitzgerald A, Jeffery S, McGee L. Epilepsy monitoring and advice recorded: general practitioners' views, current practice and patients' preferences. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jan;46(402):11–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hopkins A, Scambler G. How doctors deal with epilepsy. Lancet. 1977 Jan 22;1(8004):183–186. [PubMed]
  • Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C, Williams I, Allison S, Sterland J. Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):630–634. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lilford RJ, Kelly M, Baines A, Cameron S, Cave M, Guthrie K, Thornton J. Effect of using protocols on medical care: randomised trial of three methods of taking an antenatal history. BMJ. 1992 Nov 14;305(6863):1181–1184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners