Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 September; 46(410): 533–535.
PMCID: PMC1239749

Evaluation of computerized decision support for oral anticoagulation management based in primary care.


BACKGROUND: Increasing indications for oral anticoagulation has led to pressure on general practices to undertake therapeutic monitoring. Computerized decision support (DSS) has been shown to be effective in hospitals for improving clinical management. Its usefulness in primary care has previously not been investigated. AIM: To test the effectiveness of using DSS for oral anticoagulation monitoring in primary care by measuring the proportions of patients adequately controlled, defined as within the appropriate therapeutic range of International Normalised Ratio (INR). METHOD: All patients receiving warfarin from two Birmingham inner city general practices were invited to attend a practice-based anticoagulation clinic. In practice A all patients were managed using DSS. In practice B patients were randomized to receive dosing advice either through DSS or through the local hospital laboratory. Clinical outcomes, adverse events and patient acceptability were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were seen in total. There were significant improvements in INR control from 23% to 86% (P > 0.001) in the practice where all patients received dosing through DSS. In the practice where patients were randomized to either DSS or hospital dosing, logistic regression showed a significant trend for improvement in intervention patients which was not apparent in the hospital-dosed patients (P < 0.001). Mean recall times were significantly extended in patients who were dosed by the practice DSS through the full 12 months (24 days to 36 days) (P = 0.033). Adverse events were comparable between hospital and practice-dosed patients, although a number of esoteric events occurred. Patient satisfaction with the practice clinics was high. CONCLUSION: Computerized DSS enables the safe and effective transfer of anticoagulation management from hospital to primary care and may result in improved patient outcome in terms of the level of control, frequency of review and general acceptability.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (608K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Lowe GD. Antithrombotic treatment and atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1445–1446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gustafsson C, Asplund K, Britton M, Norrving B, Olsson B, Marké LA. Cost effectiveness of primary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Swedish national perspective. BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1457–1460. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sandercock P, Bamford J, Dennis M, Burn J, Slattery J, Jones L, Boonyakarnkul S, Warlow C. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: prevalence in different types of stroke and influence on early and long term prognosis (Oxfordshire community stroke project) BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1460–1465. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sweeney KG, Gray DP, Steele R, Evans P. Use of warfarin in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation: a commentary from general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Mar;45(392):153–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994 Aug 1;74(3):236–241. [PubMed]
  • van den Besselaar AM. Recommended method for reporting therapeutic control of oral anticoagulant therapy. Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 1990 Apr 12;63(2):316–317. [PubMed]
  • Landefeld CS, Beyth RJ. Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention. Am J Med. 1993 Sep;95(3):315–328. [PubMed]
  • McInnes GT, Helenglass G. The performance of clinics for outpatient control of anticoagulation. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1987 Jan;21(1):42–45. [PubMed]
  • Doble N, Baron JH. Anticoagulation control with warfarin by junior hospital doctors. J R Soc Med. 1987 Oct;80(10):627–627. [PubMed]
  • Pell JP, McIver B, Stuart P, Malone DN, Alcock J. Comparison of anticoagulant control among patients attending general practice and a hospital anticoagulant clinic. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Apr;43(369):152–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ryan PJ, Gilbert M, Rose PE. Computer control of anticoagulant dose for therapeutic management. BMJ. 1989 Nov 11;299(6709):1207–1209. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Taylor F, Ramsay M, Voke J, Cohen H. Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. GPs not prepared for monitoring anticoagulation. BMJ. 1993 Dec 4;307(6917):1493–1493. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shakespeare J. Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. GPs struggle to meet demand. BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):415–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Poller L, Wright D, Rowlands M. Prospective comparative study of computer programs used for management of warfarin. J Clin Pathol. 1993 Apr;46(4):299–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ware JE, Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):247–263. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners