PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 June; 44(383): 255–257.
PMCID: PMC1238896

Provision of obstetric care by general practitioners in the south western region of England.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Recent government reports have suggested changes to the organization of maternity care in the United Kingdom which may well affect the contribution of general practitioners. AIM. This study set out to document the range of obstetric care provided by general practitioners, their perceived competence at various obstetric procedures, and their beliefs about their role in maternity care. METHOD. A postal questionnaire was sent to a random one in four sample of general practitioners in the South Western Regional Health Authority of England. RESULTS. Of 424 questionnaires sent out, 333 (79%) were returned. Of 303 respondents, 98% provided both antenatal and postnatal care. Of 294 respondents, 45% provided intrapartum care and 27% booked women for home deliveries. Of 117 respondents providing hospital intrapartum care 47% booked 10 or fewer women each year, and most provided little practical intrapartum care. Compared with those providing only antenatal and postnatal care, those who provided intrapartum care believed themselves to be more competent at various obstetric procedures and their perceived competence was significantly correlated to the number of procedures that they performed. Those general practitioners providing intrapartum care made significantly more postnatal visits than those providing only antenatal/postnatal care and were significantly more likely to believe that general practitioners have an important role in labour. CONCLUSION. Many general practitioners in the south western region of England still provide a choice in maternity care for women, and believe that they have an important role in such care. Further work is required to establish what women and their general practitioners believe the latter contribute to maternity care.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (592K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Smith LF, Jewell D. Contribution of general practitioners to hospital intrapartum care in maternity units in England and Wales in 1988. BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):13–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marsh GN. The "specialty" of general practitioner obstetrics. Lancet. 1982 Mar 20;1(8273):669–672. [PubMed]
  • Baker R. General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):415–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marsh GN, Cashman HA, Russell IT. General practitioner participation in intranatal care in the northern region in 1983. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Mar 30;290(6473):971–973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Smith LF, Jewell D. Roles of midwives and general practitioners in hospital intrapartum care, England and Wales, 1988. BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1443–1444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McDonald RL. The role of emotional factors in obstetric complications: a review. Psychosom Med. 1968 Mar-Apr;30(2):222–243. [PubMed]
  • Smilkstein G, Helsper-Lucas A, Ashworth C, Montano D, Pagel M. Prediction of pregnancy complications: an application of the biopsychosocial model. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(4):315–321. [PubMed]
  • Taylor A. Maternity services: the consumer's view. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Apr;36(285):157–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners