Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brheartjLink to Publisher's site
Br Heart J. 1989 December; 62(6): 438–444.
PMCID: PMC1216785

A comparison of methods of analysing exercise tests for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.


The diagnostic accuracy of the following methods of analysing exercise tests were evaluated: (a) the cumulative area of ST segment depression during exercise normalised for workload and heart rate (exercise score); (b) discriminant analysis of electrocardiographic exercise variables, workload, and symptoms; and (c) ST segment amplitude changes during exercise adjusted for heart rate. Three hundred and forty five men without a history of myocardial infarction were studied. One hundred and twenty three were apparently healthy. Less than half (170) had coronary artery disease. All had a normal electrocardiogram at rest. A Frank lead electrocardiogram was computer processed during symptom limited bicycle ergometry. The accuracy of the exercise score (a) was low (sensitivity 67%, specificity 90%). Discriminant analysis (b) and ST segment amplitude changes adjusted for heart rate (c) had excellent diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity 80%, specificity 90%), which were little affected by concomitant use of beta blockers. Both methods seem well suited for diagnostic application in clinical practice.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1000K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Simoons ML, Hugenholtz PG. Estimation of the probability of exercise-induced ischemia by quantitative ECG analysis. Circulation. 1977 Oct;56(4 Pt 1):552–559. [PubMed]
  • Hollenberg M, Budge WR, Wisneski JA, Gertz EW. Treadmill score quantifies electrocardiographic response to exercise and improves test accuracy and reproducibility. Circulation. 1980 Feb;61(2):276–285. [PubMed]
  • Detry JM, Robert A, Luwaert RJ, Rousseau MF, Brasseur LA, Melin JA, Brohet CR. Diagnostic value of computerized exercise testing in men without previous myocardial infarction. A multivariate, compartmental and probabilistic approach. Eur Heart J. 1985 Mar;6(3):227–238. [PubMed]
  • Detrano R, Salcedo E, Passalacqua M, Friis R. Exercise electrocardiographic variables: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Oct;8(4):836–847. [PubMed]
  • Hollenberg M, Zoltick JM, Go M, Yaney SF, Daniels W, Davis RC, Jr, Bedynek JL. Comparison of a quantitative treadmill exercise score with standard electrocardiographic criteria in screening asymptomatic young men for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 5;313(10):600–606. [PubMed]
  • Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, Rogers WJ, Tyras DH, Berger R, Kennedy JW, Fisher L, Judkins MP, Mock MB, et al. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):360–367. [PubMed]
  • Simoons ML, Boom HB, Smallenburg E. On-line processing of orthogonal exercise electrocardiograms. Comput Biomed Res. 1975 Apr;8(2):105–117. [PubMed]
  • van Bemmel JH, Talmon JL, Duisterhout JS, Hengeveld SJ. Template waveform recognition applied to ECG-VCG analysis. Comput Biomed Res. 1973 Oct;6(5):430–441. [PubMed]
  • Hollenberg M, Go M, Jr, Massie BM, Wisneski JA, Gertz EW. Influence of R-wave amplitude on exercise-induced ST depression: need for a "gain factor" correction when interpreting stress electrocardiograms. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jul 1;56(1):13–17. [PubMed]
  • Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285–1293. [PubMed]
  • Rozanski A, Diamond GA, Berman D, Forrester JS, Morris D, Swan HJ. The declining specificity of exercise radionuclide ventriculography. N Engl J Med. 1983 Sep 1;309(9):518–522. [PubMed]
  • Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. [PubMed]
  • Philbrick JT, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: groups, analysis and bias. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Nov;46(5):807–812. [PubMed]
  • Berman JL, Wynne J, Cohn PF. A multivariate approach for interpreting treadmill exercise tests in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1978 Sep;58(3 Pt 1):505–512. [PubMed]
  • Greenberg PS, Ellestad MH, Clover RC. Comparison of the multivariate analysis and CADENZA systems for determination of the probability of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Feb 1;53(4):493–496. [PubMed]
  • Hung J, Chaitman BR, Lam J, Lesperance J, Dupras G, Fines P, Cherkaoui O, Robert P, Bourassa MG. A logistic regression analysis of multiple noninvasive tests for the prediction of the presence and extent of coronary artery disease in men. Am Heart J. 1985 Aug;110(2):460–469. [PubMed]
  • Weintraub WS, Madeira SW, Jr, Bodenheimer MM, Seelaus PA, Katz RI, Feldman MS, Agarwal JB, Banka VS, Helfant RH. Critical analysis of the application of Bayes' theorem to sequential testing in the noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jul 1;54(1):43–49. [PubMed]
  • Bhargava V, Watanabe K, Froelicher VF. Progress in computer analysis of the exercise electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1981 May;47(5):1143–1151. [PubMed]
  • Barolsky SM, Gilbert CA, Faruqui A, Nutter DO, Schlant RC. Differences in electrocardiographic response to exercise of women and men: a non-Bayesian factor. Circulation. 1979 Nov;60(5):1021–1027. [PubMed]
  • Vergari J, Hakki AH, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Merits and limitations of quantitative treadmill exercise score. Am Heart J. 1987 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):819–826. [PubMed]
  • Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Chaitman BR, Ryan TJ, McCabe C, Weiner D, Tristani F, Schloss M, Warner HR., Jr Diagnostic quantification of CASS (coronary artery surgery study) clinical and exercise test results in determining presence and extent of coronary artery disease. A multivariate approach. Circulation. 1981 May;63(5):987–1000. [PubMed]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group