|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
We have developed a general profile for the proteins of the TetR family of repressors. The stretch that best defines the profile of this family is made up of 47 amino acid residues that correspond to the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif and adjacent regions in the three-dimensional structures of TetR, QacR, CprB, and EthR, four family members for which the function and three-dimensional structure are known. We have detected a set of 2,353 nonredundant proteins belonging to this family by screening genome and protein databases with the TetR profile. Proteins of the TetR family have been found in 115 genera of gram-positive, α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria, cyanobacteria, and archaea. The set of genes they regulate is known for 85 out of the 2,353 members of the family. These proteins are involved in the transcriptional control of multidrug efflux pumps, pathways for the biosynthesis of antibiotics, response to osmotic stress and toxic chemicals, control of catabolic pathways, differentiation processes, and pathogenicity. The regulatory network in which the family member is involved can be simple, as in TetR (i.e., TetR bound to the target operator represses tetA transcription and is released in the presence of tetracycline), or more complex, involving a series of regulatory cascades in which either the expression of the TetR family member is modulated by another regulator or the TetR family member triggers a cell response to react to environmental insults. Based on what has been learned from the cocrystals of TetR and QacR with their target operators and from their three-dimensional structures in the absence and in the presence of ligands, and based on multialignment analyses of the conserved stretch of 47 amino acids in the 2,353 TetR family members, two groups of residues have been identified. One group includes highly conserved positions involved in the proper orientation of the helix-turn-helix motif and hence seems to play a structural role. The other set of less conserved residues are involved in establishing contacts with the phosphate backbone and target bases in the operator. Information related to the TetR family of regulators has been updated in a database that can be accessed at www.bactregulators.org.
Bacteria in the environment are exposed to variations in temperature and nutrient and water availability and the presence of toxic molecules that originate from their abiotic and biotic surroundings (including deleterious molecules that originate from their own metabolism). These changes can make their living conditions far from optimal. Survival in this unstable environment requires a wide range of rapid, adaptive responses which are triggered by regulatory proteins. These regulators respond to specific environmental and cellular signals that modulate transcription, translation, or some other event in gene expression, so that the physiological responses are modified appropriately (32, 52, 64, 104, 107, 145, 244, 311, 312, 326, 330, 379, 397, 409, 427).
In most cases, the adaptive responses are mediated by transcriptional regulators. Most microbial regulators involved in transcriptional control are two-domain proteins with a signal-receiving domain and a DNA-binding domain which transduces the signal (1, 18, 145, 152, 170, 207, 271, 292-294, 298, 303, 345, 369, 428, 431) (Table (Table1).1). In other cases, the sensing of signals that trigger a transcriptional process involves two proteins, as in two-component regulatory systems such as CzcR/CzcS; DcuS/DcuR; NifL/NifA; NtrB/NtrC; PhoP/PhoQ; and TodS/TodT (75, 139, 200, 206, 233, 234, 257, 307, 309, 316, 409, 423). One protein is usually a membrane-linked kinase that, upon sensing the appropriate signal, phosphorylates a DNA-binding protein that mediates transcription from its cognate promoter. Structural analyses have revealed that the helix-turn-helix (HTH) signature is the most recurrent DNA-binding motif in prokaryotic transcriptional factors, since almost 95% of all transcriptional factors described in prokaryotes use the HTH motif to bind their target DNA sequences (12, 19, 27, 41, 43, 104, 135, 136, 302, 335, 343).
Prokaryotic transcriptional regulators are classified in families on the basis of sequence similarity and structural and functional criteria (49, 84, 106, 108, 120, 121, 138, 145, 146, 237, 274, 308, 313, 324, 342, 370, 377). Table Table11 lists the most important families of microbial transcriptional regulators, the type of DNA binding motifs they exhibit, whether the members of the family are preferentially repressors or activators, and whether they show a dual action.
Members of the TetR family of repressors are identified by a profile (see below) which can be easily used to recognize TetR family members in SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL and in all available proteins from prokaryotic genome sequences. After compiling data from protein and nucleic acid databases, the TetR family of regulators was found to include 2,353 nonredundant sequences (as of December 2004). The specific function regulated by members of the TetR family is known for only about 85 members (Table (Table2).2). These proteins control genes whose products are involved in multidrug resistance, enzymes implicated in different catabolic pathways, biosynthesis of antibiotics, osmotic stress, and pathogenicity of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (Table (Table2).2). The most relevant information on these proteins is collected in a database available at http://www.bactregulators.org (235). The database also supplies information for each member of the family, including identifiers, names, sequences, source, function, COG (clusters orthologous groups), position and orientation of the corresponding gene in the genome, and, when available, three-dimensional structures.
The TetR family is named after the member of this group that has been most completely characterized genetically and biochemically, the TetR protein (141, 148, 150, 168, 288, 395). This protein controls the expression of the tet genes, whose products confer resistance to tetracycline (150, 183, 209, 210, 337, 434, 435). Members of the TetR family exhibit a high degree of sequence similarity at the DNA binding domain (see below). Interpro (258) assigns proteins to the TetR family based on PROSITE signature PS01081 (364), PRINTS motif PR00455 (15, 16), and Pfam Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile PF00440 (26, 27). To establish a single criterion defining the TetR family, we decided to develop a conventional profile, because conventional profiles are easy to manage and their sensitivity is equivalent to that of HMM profiles.
To develop the TetR family profile, we first selected a set of 120 sequences as belonging to the TetR family based on two criteria: a positive score for PROSITE signature PS01081, and a high score for PF00440 HMM. The 120 sequences were clustered into 42 groups using BLAST, and a representative sequence was selected and aligned for each cluster using CLUSTAL (http://clustalw.genome.ad.jp/). This revealed that the most conserved region corresponded to the HTH domain described in the TetR and QacR crystals (120, 150, 287, 288, 289, 349, 350, 351). The initial HTH motif was progressively extended until the global score of the multialignment diminished. Figure Figure11 shows the final alignment of the sequences. This conserved stretch corresponded in TetR and QacR crystals to the almost complete α-helix 1, the HTH domain formed by α-helices 2 and 3, and five residues of α-helix 4 that connect the DNA-interacting region with the core of the protein (see Fig. Fig.22 for the three-dimensional structure of TetR).
The final alignment shown in Fig. Fig.11 was used as a seed for the construction of a conventional profile to detect TetR family members. The TetR profile was built using the pfmake program available at the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa__automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa__pfmake.html) (45, 46). The TetR profile was confronted against the 660,992 bacterial and archaeal proteins in the SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL databases (released December 2004) using the pfsearch program available at http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/interfaces/pftools.html#pfsearch (46). The program, which proposes a tentative threshold Z-score of 8.5 to consider a protein a member of the TetR family, selected 2,357 proteins as putative members of the TetR family.
To verify the quality of this TetR profile for specificity (false positives) and sensitivity (false negatives), we implemented a new tool called Provalidator which uses Interpro, Swiss-Prot, Prodom, TIGRfam, CoGnitor, NCBI-RPS-BLAST, and PSI-BLAST resources (68, 128, 154, 323, 348, 387, 449). In the first step, we searched for false positives among the 2,353 proteins we assigned to the TetR family. Interpro assigned 2,315 proteins to the TetR family, and these 2,315 were considered true positives. The remaining 38 proteins were analyzed with other resources such as TIGRfam, Prodom, NCBI-RPS-BLAST and PSI-BLAST (128, 449). This allowed us to assign 34 proteins to the TetR family. Three of the false positives (Q89RN6, Q988I6, and Q6N8G8) that we found were protein members of the AraC/XylS family of transcription activators (109, 394). These proteins have two HTH motifs at the C-terminal end, typical of AraC/XylS family members (109, 229). These three proteins were identified as potential TetR members because one of its HTH is highly similar to the DNA-binding domain in TetR. The fourth false positive is a transposase (Q981E7).
Provalidator detected 15 false negatives (Q742Y2, Q8CJK3, Q73ZY1, Q6D1J7, Q8KU64, Q9A917, Q880T2, Q6D2Z4, Q885G7, Q8PC90, Q9A466, Q9S6C0, Q9ZH26, Q6A626, and Q8G822), which are proteins assigned to the TetR family by INTERPRO but whose Z-score was between 6.407 and 8.487. In summary, the TetR profile with a Z-score threshold of 8.5 identified proteins that were not detected by INTERPRO, and among the 660,992 proteins analyzed, only four false positives were found. These results indicate that the new algorithm is highly effective for the detection of members of the TetR family.
Using the profile defined above for the TetR family, we searched for members of this family in the Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases and also searched the 196 complete and incomplete microbial genomes available in NCBI (Release December 2004). We detected 73 TetR proteins in Swiss-Prot, 2,277 in TrEMBL, and 2,410 in the translated open reading frame corresponding to 196 microbial genomes. To select nonredundant sequences the set of 4,758 TetR proteins was analyzed using the SEQUNIQ program developed in our laboratory (Molina-Henares et al., unpublished results). This program integrates the set of sequences available in nucleic acid and protein databases. We found 2,353 sequences in the TetR family that surpassed the threshold Z-score of 8.5. The HTH in 2,348 members of the family was located at the N-terminal end of the proteins.
Table Table33 shows that members of the TetR family were detected in 144 microbial genomes belonging to 80 genera and 113 species of gram-positive and α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria, cyanobacteria, and archaea, indicating wide taxonomic distribution. We have found that proteins of the TetR family are encoded both in chromosomes and in plasmids, and the mobility of the latter elements could be a source of the spread of genes in this family via horizontal transfer (147, 383), as is also the case with catabolic genes (77, 160, 236, 410, 426), antimicrobial resistance determinants (20, 100, 124), and 16S rRNA genes (347).
We found that TetR family members are particularly abundant in microbes exposed to environmental changes, such as soil microorganisms (i.e., Nocardia, Streptomyces, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Ralstonia spp.); plant and animal pathogens (i.e., Agrobacterium, Brucella, Escherichia coli, Bordetella, Mycobacterium, and Salmonella spp.), extremophiles (i.e., Deinococcus), and methanogenic bacteria such as Methanosarcina acetivorans. In contrast, TetR family members do not appear in intracellular pathogens such as chlamydias, mycoplasmas, and endosymbionts such as Buchera, in agreement with their life style in nonchanging environments (52). However, it should be noted that Dugan et al. (80) recently found that Chlamydia suis can acquire tetracycline resistance via horizontal gene transfer of genomic islands bearing the tet genes.
As a general collorarium, we can say that it seems that proteins of the TetR family are involved in the adaptation to complex and changing environments. This in turn correlates with the fact that many members of the TetR family are found among microbes with abundant extracytoplasmic function sigma factors (52, 227, 236, 277, 444).
The high degree of primary sequence identity in the stretch that defines the HTH region of the TetR profile probably reflects a common three-dimensional structure in this domain in members of the family. This is supported by the almost identical three-dimensional structure of the HTH of TetR, QacR, CprB, and EthR, as deduced from the superimposition of these regions, and the high degree of sequence conservation in the alignment (79, 264, 349). As in other families of transcriptional regulators, no sequence conservation was found outside the HTH domain, which probably reflects differences in the kind of signal sensed by different regulators of the family, i.e., antibiotics with dissimilar structures, barbiturates, homoserine lactones, organic solvents, and choline (see Table Table2).2). Nonetheless, some striking global structural conservation in the three-dimensional structure was found.
In addition, given that all members of the family whose function is known are repressors, they probably function in a similar way. Binding of an inducer molecule to the nonconserved domain of a TetR family member probably causes conformational changes in the conserved DNA-binding region that result in release of the repressor from the operator and thus allow transcription from the cognate promoter. To gain insights into the mechanisms of action of the TetR family members, we analyzed in detail the three-dimensional structure of the four members of the family, TetR, QacR, CprB, and EthR, whose crystal structures have been obtained (150, 264, 286-289, 349-351), in order to identify common and differential features of the TetR family members.
Tetracyclines are among the most commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics (209, 210). They act by binding to the small ribosomal subunit, thereby interrupting polypeptide chain elongation by an unknown mechanism. Many gram-negative bacteria have developed mechanisms of resistance against this antibiotic. The most frequent mechanism involves a membrane-associated protein (TetA) that exports the antibiotic out of the bacterial cell before it inhibits polypeptide elongation (169, 211, 389, 434, 435, 453).
Adjacent to tetA and divergently oriented is tetR (112), whose gene product tightly controls expression of both tetA and tetR (148, 150). The intergenic region between the tetR and tetA genes contains two identical operators separated by 11 bp. TetR binds to these operators and thus prevents transcription from both promoters (Fig. (Fig.3)3) and (288). In all TetR crystal structures elucidated to date (PDB identifiers: 2TCT; 2TRT; 1A6I; 1BJO; 1BJY; 1BJZ; 1ORK; and 1RP1), this repressor appears as a homodimer (29, 30, 159, 183, 287-289, 366). The TetR homodimer binds to the operator (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Each 15-bp operator shows an internal palindromic symmetry with an extra central base pair (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). The operator sequences overlap with promoters for tetA and tetR, thereby blocking the expression of both genes. When tetracycline complexed with Mg2+ binds to TetR (166, 384), a conformational change takes place that renders the TetR protein unable to bind DNA. As a consequence, TetR and TetA are expressed (286).
The TetR homodimer is constituted by two identical monomers that fold into 10 α-helices with connecting turns and loops (Fig. (Fig.2).2). The three-dimensional structure of the TetR monomer is stabilized mainly by hydrophobic helix-to-helix contacts. The global structure of the TetR homodimer can be divided into two DNA-binding domains at the N-terminal end of each monomer, and a regulatory core domain involved in dimerization and ligand binding (150, 286-289). The DNA-binding domains are constituted by helices α1, α2, and α3 and their symmetric helices α1′, α2′, and α3′ (a prime denotes the second monomer). Helices α4 and α4′ connect these domains with the regulatory core domain composed of helices α5 to α10 and their symmetric counterparts α5′ and α10′ (150, 287, 289). The regulatory domain is responsible for dimerization and contains, for each monomer, a binding pocket that accommodates tetracycline in the presence of a divalent cation. Helices α5, α8, and α10 and their counterparts α5′, α8′, and α10′ constitute the scaffold of the core domain, and their structure is the most conserved in both TetR conformations (150, 287-289).
The tetracycline-binding pocket is identical in both monomers. The cavity to which the [TcMg]+ complex binds is depicted in Fig. Fig.44 (286, 287, 289). The entrance of this cavity is controlled by α9′ and the C-terminal end of α8′ and the loop that connects both, while the exit is closed by loop 4-5 (287- 289). When [TcMg]+ enters the tunnel, its A ring makes contacts with loop 4-5, and the interaction with the effector triggers a cascade of conformational changes. The contacts that His100 and Thr103, both in α6, establish with the magnesium ion of the complex displace α6, which undergoes a conformational change in its C terminus to form a β-turn (Fig. (Fig.4).4). The 6-7 loop is also pushed near the inducer, so that Arg104 and Pro105 interact with tetracycline. Translation of α6 forces α4 to move in the same direction due to van der Waals contacts. His64 of α4, anchored to α5 and to tetracycline, acts as a pivot point, and α4 moves like a pendulum. As a consequence of the rotation of α4 and α4′, recognition helices α3 and α3′ move further apart, and the DNA contacts are disrupted (Fig. (Fig.5)5) (286, 287, 289). Tetracycline is impeded from freeing the binding cavity, and TetR cannot bind its target DNA again. It should be noted that residues outside the binding cavity can influence affinity for tetracycline, as revealed by Kamionka et al. (168), who isolated a double mutant (G96E, L205S) with reduced affinity for the antibiotic.
The on/off switch mechanism used by TetR to respond to specific signals may be used similarly in other TetR family members.
Cocrystallization of TetR with its operator DNA established that the TetR homodimer binds perpendicularly to the longitudinal DNA axis (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). Two adjacent DNA major groove regions covering a 6-base-pair area on both strands are involved in the almost perfect docking with the two TetR-interacting domains (Fig. (Fig.3A3A and and3B)3B) (288). No water molecules were found at the TetR-DNA interface, where the crucial interactions are hydrophobic (288).
The interactions of each HTH domain with the operator DNA are summarized in Fig. Fig.3A3A and and3B.3B. The TetR monomer A binds the main strand from positions −4 to −7 while contacting the complementary strand from operator positions +4 to +2, and the symmetric monomer A' binds the main strand from positions +2 to +4 and the complementary strand from positions −4 to −7 (Fig. (Fig.3A3A and and3B3B).
Crystallographic analysis revealed that helix α3 (from Gln38 to His44) is the main element responsible for sequence-specific recognition, since all residues in this helix contribute to it, except for Leu41, which is part of the hydrophobic core stabilizing the α1, α2, and α3 helix bundle. Thr40 residue in monomer A establishes direct contacts with operator base pairs T(−7) and C(−6) in the main DNA strand (Fig. (Fig.3A3A and and3B).3B). Trp43 interacts with T(−7) as well. Pro39 interacts with both strands at bases T(−5) and A(−4) of the main strand and T(+4) of the complementary strand. In the rest of the operator half site, the α3 helix of monomer A interacts with the complementary strand, Tyr42 contacting with T(+4) and Gln38 with A(+3). Helix α2 supplies an additional specific contact with the complementary strand, namely, Arg28 contacts G(+2).
Although the TetR DNA binding domain maintains its structure thanks to a hydrophobic core formed by residues from the α1, α2, and α3 bundle (288), interactions with DNA lead to changes in the TetR DNA binding domain. One such change is that α3 forms a 310-helical turn at the N-terminal end as a result of complex DNA contacts. The H-bonds between Arg28-G(+2), and Gln38-A(+3) increase the separation between base pairs 1 and 2 from 3.4 Å to 3.9 Å (288). The two phosphate groups accompanying the G at position +2 establish H-bonds with side chains of Thr26, Thr27, Tyr42, and Lys48, and with the amino groups of the main chain of Thr27 and Lys48 (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). These contacts draw DNA closer to TetR near G(+2). Although the DNA is kinked away from TetR at position +2 in both operator strands, bending toward TetR in the area corresponding to positions +3 to +6 compensates for the DNA deviation. Crystallographic studies revealed that Lys48 located in α4, outside the HTH motif, also established contacts with the target DNA region (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). This lysine is relatively well conserved among TetR family members, and we are tempted to suggest that this residue plays an equivalent role in other proteins of the TetR family.
QacA confers resistance to monovalent and bivalent cationic lipophilic antiseptics and disinfectants such as quaternary ammonium compounds (hence the name Qac) (10, 11, 44, 239). The qac locus consists of the qacA gene and the divergently transcribed qacR gene, which are borne on a plasmid (119). In the absence of drug, the 188-residue QacR protein represses transcription of the qacA multidrug transporter gene by binding two nested palindromes located downstream from the qacA promoter and overlapping its transcription start site (119, 300). Therefore, QacR seems to repress transcription by hindering the transition of the RNA polymerase-promoter complex into a productively transcribing state rather than by blocking RNA polymerase binding.
The three-dimensional structure of QacR (PDB identifiers 1JTX, 1JTG, 1JTY, 1JUM, 1JUP, 1JUS, and 1JTO) revealed that it is an all-helical protein which contains a DNA-binding HTH motif embedded within an N-terminal three-helix bundle and a second domain involved in drug binding and dimerization (350, 351). It should be noted that unlike TetR, two QacR dimers, rather than one, bind the operator site (339, 340) (Fig. (Fig.66).
The monomers of each dimer have been called proximal and distal to refer to their positions with respect to the center of symmetry of the palindromic operator (Fig. (Fig.6A6A and and6B).6B). It was shown that the operator to which one dimer is bound is symmetric and partially overlaps that bound by the other dimer (351) (Fig. (Fig.66 and and7).7). The existence within the same fragment of DNA sequence of two overlapping partial palindromes with identical symmetric bases is therefore surprising (Fig. (Fig.6).6). In this sense the palindromic sequences recognized by QacR are equivalent to those described for the TetR interface except for the spacer sequence length, 3 bp for TetR versus 4 bp for QacR, supporting the hypothesis that interactions of other members of the family with their target sequences may be similar, independent of the number of dimers involved.
The α3 helix of QacR A distal and B distal monomers establish the most extensive specific interactions with the operator (351). The Tyr41 residue of the A distal monomer (Fig. (Fig.6B)6B) establishes hydrophobic contacts with base T(−10) of the DNA main strand as well as with the phosphate at position −11 in the main strand, while Tyr40 contacts T(+7) (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). In addition, tight docking with DNA is facilitated by specific hydrogen bonds between Lys36 and base G(+6) in the complementary strand, and between Gly37 and base G(−8) in the main strand. Gly37 is important in repression because nucleotide G(−8) is the transcription start site for the qacA gene. Monomers A and B proximal also establish a series of critical interactions. For instance, Tyr41 of B proximal contacts the C(−6) base in the main strand, whereas Tyr40 contacts base T(+3) and phosphate (+2) in the complementary strand (351). Gly37 in the A proximal monomer contacts G(−4) in the complementary strand, whereas Lys36 contacts G(+1) in the main strand. A number of residues in α2, loop α2-α3, α3 and the positive dipole of the α1 (N terminus) also interact with the phosphate backbone of both DNA strands (351).
Figure Figure6C6C shows how each dimer engages the DNA major groove in a face almost opposite to the other dimer, forming an angle between the two dimer axes of less than 180° (Fig. (Fig.7).7). Studies of QacR binding to DNA have indicated that the two dimers bind DNA cooperatively (120, 121, 351). Analysis of the three-dimensional structure suggested that such cooperativity does not arise from protein-protein interactions, as the closest approach of the dimers is 5.0 Å. Rather, binding cooperativity appears to be mediated through conversion of the DNA structure from a B-DNA conformation to the high-affinity undertwisted configuration observed in the crystal structure. Conversion of the DNA conformation is necessary because the optimal distance between each of the HTH motifs of the QacR dimer is 37 Å. This requires expansion of the 34-Å distance between successive major groove regions on one edge of the canonical B-DNA. It has been suggested that binding of the first QacR dimer forces this energetically unfavorable conformational change, which in turn produces an optimal DNA conformation for the easy binding of the second dimer (351). Experimental data reported by Grkovic et al. (121, 122) suggested that the two dimers must bind simultaneously and cooperatively to the operator in order to maintain the DNA deformation detected in the crystal.
Schumacher and Brennan (349) noticed that TetR and QacR achieve the same degree of specificity in DNA binding through different mechanisms. They noted that TetR, recruits Arg28, located outside its recognition helix, to make a base pair-specific contact (288), whereas QacR does not employ residues outside α3 to ensure DNA binding specificity. They also noted that TetR kinks its binding site and induces a 17° bend towards the protein to optimize the position of its HTH motifs for specific base interactions within each DNA half site; whereas QacR widens the major groove of the entire IR1 binding site smoothly and bends its DNA site by only 3°. These distinctions are reflected in the different HTH center-to-center distances observed in QacR (37 Å). Thus, an important lesson derived from comparisons of the QacR-DNA and TetR-DNA structures is that even structurally homologous proteins of the same family that share a similar function, i.e., repression, can utilize slightly different mechanisms of action.
QacR is released from the qacA operator by its interaction with a number of cationic lipophilic drugs such as rhodamine 6G, crystal violet, and ethidium (119). More recently, Grkovic et al. (122) showed that effector recognition of QacR can be extended to several bivalent cationic dyes and plant alkaloids. In spite of the existence of two binding pockets, only one drug molecule is bound by each homodimer, as determined by equilibrium dialysis studies and isothermal titration calorimetry for the QacR-R6G complex (350). The QacR crystal bound to different drugs revealed another remarkable finding: the presence of an expansive and multifaceted drug-binding pocket with a volume of 1,100 Å3, so that different drugs partially overlap different subpockets (349, 351). A similar cavity able to bind multiple drugs was reported by Yu et al. (445, 446) for the AcrB multidrug transporter.
Crystallographic studies by Schumacher et al. (350) and Murray et al. (261) have demonstrated that multidrug recognition mediated by the QacR dimer is a rather simple process that, contrary to expectations, does not require sophisticated molecular mechanisms. Indeed, the drug binding domain of QacR consists of six α-helices (PDB identifiers: 1JTX, 1JT6, 1JTY, 1JUP, 1JUS, 1JTO, 1RKW, and 1RPW). Entry to the mostly buried drug-binding pocket is through a small opening formed by the divergence of helices α6, α7, α8, and α8′. The stoichiometry of one drug molecule for two QacR subunits led to this asymmetric induction process, in which the drug-bound monomer undergoes a major structural change. Comparison of the drug-bound structure with the DNA-bound structure reveals that drug binding triggers a coil-to-helix transition of residues 89 to 93, which extends helix α5 by a turn. This transition removes the drug surrogates Tyr92 and Tyr93 from the hydrophobic core of the protein. Expulsion of these tyrosines also leads to the relocation of nearby helix α6 and its tethered DNA-binding domain. The result of this structural transition is a 9-Å translation and a 37° rotation of the DNA-binding domain, effectively rendering the QacR dimer unable to bind its target DNA.
The gram-positive bacterial genus Streptomyces uses γ-butyrolactones as autoregulators or microbial hormones, together with their specific receptors (γ-butyrolactone receptors), to control morphological differentiation, antibiotic production, or both (150, 151). The most representative of the γ-butyrolactone autoregulatory factors is 2-isocapryloyl-3R-hydroxymethyl-γ-butyrolactone, known as A-factor, which is essential for aerial mycelium formation, streptomycin production, streptomycin resistance, and yellow pigment production (133, 134, 155) in Streptomyces griseus. However, the A-factor receptor protein, known as ArpA, has proved to be difficult to purify. In contrast, the CprB protein from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), which is 30% identical to ArpA (284), has been purified and crystallized (264), although the ligand for CprB is still unknown. Nonetheless, CprB binds the same nucleotide sequence as does ArpA (375) and indeed CprB also serves as a negative regulator for both secondary metabolism and morphogenesis in S. coelicolor, as ArpA does in S. griseus (264, 284).
The CprB dimer is omega shaped, and the two subunits in the dimer are related by a pseudo-twofold axis. Each monomer of CprB is composed of 10 α-helices and has two domains: a DNA-binding domain (residues 1 to 52) and a regulatory domain (residues 77 to 215). The three-dimensional structure of CprB is essentially similar to that of QacR bound to DNA except for the lack of α10 (350, 351). In addition, the DNA-binding domains of the two proteins are very similar, so much so that the two DNA-binding domains can be superimposed with an rms deviation of 1.48 Å for 71 Cα atoms (264). Although no information on CprB-operator DNA is available, the high degree of sequence conservation allowed the authors to predict that the core of the DNA-binding domain is composed of Ile14, Ile15, Ala18, Phe22, Leu32, Ile35, Leu46, and Phe50.
It has been suggested that a CprB dimer binds to its target DNA as found in the TetR-DNA complex (150, 287, 288). This is because structure-based amino acid sequence alignment shows that at the amino acid sequence level the DNA-binding domains of CprB and TetR are highly identical. This suggests that there is an evolutionary relationship between the DNA-binding domains of the two proteins. The regulatory domain of CprB is composed of six α-helices (helices α5 to α10) (264), which can also be superimposed on the corresponding domain of TetR (286, 287, 289) (PDB code 1JT0).
Ethionamide has been used for more than 30 years as a second-line chemotherapeutic treatment in tuberculosis patients who have developed resistance to first-line drugs such as isoniazid and rifampin. Activation of the prodrug ethionamide is regulated by the Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenase EthA and the TetR family repressor EthR, whose open reading frames are separated by 75 bp in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. EthR has been shown to repress transcription of the activator ethA gene by binding to the intergenic region and contributing to ethionamide resistance.
The expression of ethA is regulated by EthR in M. tuberculosis. Overexpression of ethR leads to ethionamide resistance, whereas chromosomal inactivation of ethR promotes ethionamide hypersensitivity (28). EthR was found to bind directly and specifically to DNA sequences corresponding to the ethRA intergenic region (28, 90). The large EthR operator, which comprises 55 bp in comparison with the 15-bp operators recognized by most other family members, is organized as a putative highly degenerated palindrome containing pairs of overlapping inverted and tandem repeat sequences (90). In the absence of DNA, EthR forms a homodimer in solution, and surface plasmon resonance measurements suggest that EthR octamerizes when bound to DNA (90).
The EthR monomer is an all-helical, two-domain molecule (79). The N-terminal domain comprises helices 1 to 3, with helices 2 and 3 forming the HTH DNA-binding motif seen in other TetR family protein structures. The larger C-terminal domain, which in QacR and TetR has been dubbed the drug-binding domain, consists of helices 4 to 9, and its function in EthR is unknown. The crystal structure revealed that the dimerization interface, a conserved structural feature among the TetR class of repressors, is primarily formed by helices 8 and 9 (288, 351).
One of the most striking features of the EthR structure is a narrow tunnel-like cavity formed by helices 4, 5, 7, and 8 that opens to the bottom of the molecule (79). The tunnel measures about 20 Å in length and is lined predominantly, albeit not exclusively, by aromatic residues, with helices 5 and 7 constituting the majority of side chains. The loop connecting helices 4 and 5 restricts the opening of the hydrophobic tunnel, and the electron density in this loop is only poorly defined, indicating a certain degree of structural flexibility in the loop. This cavity may serve as the binding site for an as yet unknown ligand.
New genomic/proteomic approaches are leading to the crystallization of a number of proteins, many of which have no assigned function. The following proteins of the TetR family have been crystallized: Cgl2612 of Corynebacterium glutamicum (pdb 1V7B); YbiH of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (pdb 1T33); YcdC of Escherichia coli (pdb 1PB6); and YfiR and YsiA from Bacillus subtilis (pdb 1RKT and 1VIO, respectively).
There is a perfect overlap of the DNA binding domains of QacR, TetR, CprB, and EthR, and no gaps were found in the α-helices involved in contacts with DNA in the multialignment of the 2,353 members of the TetR family in this domain. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that residues at the same position in the multialignment of all family members may play equivalent roles. This prompted us to analyze each amino acid in the multialignment within the DNA binding domain.
Analysis comparison of the cocrystal of QacR and TetR with their corresponding operators revealed that residues corresponding to positions 22, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, and 43 in the family multialignment are involved in interactions with target operator DNA (Fig. (Fig.1).1). We analyzed the occurrence of each amino acid at these positions in the multialignment of all members of the TetR family (Table (Table44).
We found two types of position, one in which the residue was highly conserved and another in which the residue was poorly conserved, if at all. Positions 37, 39, and 43 were well conserved, whereas at positions 22, 33, 34, 35, and 38 the profile aligned different residues.
Tyr42 in TetR and Tyr40 in QacR corresponded to position 37 in the profile sequence displayed in Fig. Fig.1,1, where a Tyr residue appeared in 74.16% of the aligned proteins (Table (Table4).4). The next most highly represented residues in this position are also aromatic amino acids: phenylalanine (8%) and histidine (4%) (Table (Table4).4). Tyr-42 in TetR and Tyr40 in QacR appear at the center of α-helix 3 and contact a thymine located at the center of the palindrome forming the operator and also contact a phosphate one position towards the center of the palindrome (Fig. (Fig.3B3B and and6B6B).
The residue at position 39 of the profile in the multialignment corresponds to His44 in TetR and His42 in QacR. In the corresponding cocrystals, these residues established contacts with the phosphate backbone (Fig. (Fig.3B3B and Fig. Fig.6B).6B). In the multiple sequence alignment of all family members, either histidine or tyrosine appears at position 39. We are tempted to propose that this residue is critical for interactions with the phosphate backbone.
A lysine-DNA phosphate interaction is shared at residues Lys48 in TetR and Lys46 in QacR, which correspond to position 43 in the multialignment and are located in the amino end of the α4 helix. A lysine residue is present in 77% of TetR proteins, and their interactions with DNA phosphates seem to be crucial to adjust the HTH domain to contact DNA (Fig. (Fig.3B3B and and6B).6B). At position 22 of the profile (Thr27 in TetR and Thr25 in QacR), five residues are the most abundant (Val, Leu, Met, Ile, and Thr). Thr27 in TetR and Thr25 in QacR are involved in interactions with the phosphate backbone.
Thus, in the TetR family, the contacts established by the residue aligned at position 37 in α3 (tyrosine present in 74% of the cases) and 39 in α3 (His or Tyr present in 98% of the cases) and a residue at position 43 in α4 (Lys present in 77% of the cases) probably orient the HTH motif to interact with the DNA major groove and anchor the protein to the phosphate backbone.
Glycine at position 16, located at the end of α1, in the multialignment is highly conserved and is involved in changing the polypeptide direction in the TetR and QacR crystals to orient the HTH DNA binding domain properly.
Positions 33, 34, 35, and 38 of the profile align many different residues (Table (Table4).4). In TetR and QacR, the corresponding residues establish specific contacts with different DNA bases except Asn38 of QacR (position 35 in the multialignment), which contacts the phosphate backbone. Based on the high variability of these positions in the corresponding multiple alignment of the family, we are tempted to propose that these positions endow specificity to each protein so that it can recognize its operator through specific protein-DNA interactions.
Published data indicate that the specific function of 85 members of TetR family is known (Table (Table2).2). More information about each TetR protein is available at http://www.bactregulators.org (235). We have clustered the functions regulated by TetR family members into 10 groups (Table (Table2).2). The most frequent function performed by TetR family proteins is the regulation of efflux pumps and transporters involved in antibiotic resistance and tolerance to toxic chemicals. We have also observed that TetR family members often regulate their own synthesis, this feedback control ensures the transcriptional repressor level within optimal concentration limits (31, 73, 231, 338, 392). In this simple regulatory scheme, synthesis of the repressor and of the regulated protein(s) is derepressed in the presence of an inducer molecule.
However, TetR family proteins also participate in other types of regulatory networks that underlie complex processes, such as homeostasis in metabolism (biosynthesis of amino acids, nucleotides, protoheme, and reserve material), synthesis of osmoprotectants, quorum sensing, drug resistance, virulence, and processes related to growth phase-dependent differentiation (sporulation and biosynthesis of antibiotics) (Table (Table2)2) (www.bactregulators.org) (235).
Figure Figure88 shows a series of schemes in which a TetR family member plays a role in complex circuits. Below, for the sake of brevity, we have analyzed only some representative sets of regulatory networks, including proteins involved in drug resistance (AcrR of E. coli and MtrR of Neisseria gonorrhoeae), biosynthesis of an osmoprotectant (BetI), a key protein involved in idiophase antibiotic production and differentiation in Streptomyces (ArpR), a protein involved in pathogenesis in Vibrio (HapR), and some proteins involved in quorum sensing.
Multiple antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli has attracted recent attention, promoting the elucidation of a number of mechanisms that contribute to this phenomenon. One of these is the transport of diverse substrates out of the cell by the AcrAB-TolC efflux transporter, leading to a multiple antibiotic resistance (Mar) phenotype (267). The set of antibiotics to which AcrAB can confer resistance includes ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, fluoroquinolones, β-lactams, novobiocin, tetracycline, tigecycline, and rifampin (151, 187, 223, 267, 268, 276).
AcrB is a large cytoplasmic membrane protein (224, 226, 445, 446) which associates with AcrA, a membrane fusion protein (281), and TolC, a protein that forms a channel for the extrusion of substrates into the medium (102, 193). The acrA and acrB genes form an operon (224) whose transcription is regulated by the acrR gene product. The acrR gene is divergently transcribed from the acrAB operon. Overexpression of AcrR represses the transcription of acrAB. This observation is consistent with the function of AcrR as a repressor for acrAB transcription. Evidence for this function has come also from gel shift mobility assays, which provided direct evidence for the binding of AcrR to the promoter region of acrAB. DNA sequencing (92) of certain isolates that overexpressed acrB mRNA revealed that the mutant strains had insertions that disrupted the acrR gene or point mutations that rendered a nonfunctional regulator, i.e., an amino acid substitution of cysteine for arginine at position 45 of AcrR. This biochemical and genetic evidence provides support for the regulatory role of AcrR.
MarA, SoxS, and Rob are related transcriptional activators of the AraC/XylS family (7, 112, 367) that activate acrAB expression, although they are not involved in the regulation of acrAB in response to general stress conditions (13, 14, 21, 35, 110, 224) because the acrAB operon can be activated in response to these stresses in genetic backgrounds lacking mar and sox (223-225). It was also found that general stress conditions increased the transcription of acrAB in the absence of functional AcrR, and these conditions, surprisingly, increased the transcription of acrR to a greater extent than that of acrAB. These results suggest the existence of a mar-sox-independent pathway to control acrAB expression in response to the general stress conditions. This transcriptional control of acrAB is also AcrR independent. Therefore, a major role of AcrR is to function as a specific secondary modulator to fine-tune the level of acrAB transcription and prevent unwanted overexpression of the efflux pump. This represents a novel mechanism for regulating gene expression in E. coli.
The MtrCDE efflux pump of Neisseria gonorrhoeae provides gonococci with a mechanism to resist structurally diverse antimicrobial hydrophobic agents and antibiotic peptides that adopt β-sheet (protegenin 1) or two-helix (PC-8 and LC37) structures (130, 228, 238, 353). Mutations that render no expression or inactivation of mtrR, encoding a transcriptional repressor, resulted in high expression of the mtrCDE operon, concomitantly increasing resistance to hydrophobic agents (69, 130, 220, 221, 297, 353, 447). It was also found that strains of N. gonorrhoeae that display hypersusceptibility to hydrophobic agents often contained mutations in the mtrCDE efflux pump genes (406).
The mtrR gene is divergently transcribed with respect to the mtrCDE operon (Fig. (Fig.8F).8F). The promoters of mtrR and mtrC overlap in their −35 boxes, and footprinting analysis showed that MtrR binds a 40-bp region within the −10 to −35 region of the mtrR promoter, which contains an inverted repeat (221). MtrR bound to its target site prevented expression from the efflux pump operon and its regulator (Fig. (Fig.8F).8F). The expression of mtr genes is enhanced by the AraC/XylS member MtrA, although the mechanism of activation of this protein is unknown.
On the other hand, Veal and Shafer (407) have recently identified a gene that was designated mtrF, located downstream of the mtrR gene, that is predicted to encode a 56.1-kDa cytoplasmic membrane protein containing 12 transmembrane domains. Expression of mtrF was enhanced in a strain deficient in MtrR production, indicating that this gene, together with the closely linked mtrCDE operon, is subject to MtrR-dependent transcriptional control. Genetic evidence suggests that MtrF is also important in the expression of high-level detergent resistance by gonococci, and it was proposed that MtrF acts in conjunction with the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE efflux pump to confer high-level resistance to certain hydrophobic agents in gonococci. MtrR also controls the farAB operon, which encodes an efflux pump involved in resistance to long-chain fatty acids (Fig. (Fig.8F).8F). The efflux pump FarAB uses MtrE as the outer membrane component (208).
In Escherichia coli, glycine betaine serves as an osmoprotector in hyperosmotically stressed cells. This osmoprotector accumulates in large amounts in the cytoplasm, which allows cells to maintain appropriate osmotic strength and thus prevents dehydration. Glycine betaine is only one of several cellular osmolytes used by E. coli, but its accumulation allows this microbe to achieve its highest level of osmotic tolerance (199, 373). To accumulate glycine betaine, E. coli needs an external supply of this compound or its precursors choline and betaine aldehyde.
The osmoregulatory choline-glycine betaine pathway is encoded by the bet genes. The betA gene encodes choline dehydrogenase; betB encodes betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase; betT encodes a transport system for choline; and betI encodes a 21.8-kDa repressor protein involved in choline regulation of the bet genes (Fig. (Fig.8C).8C). The bet genes are linked, with betT being transcribed divergently from the betIBA operon (203, 374). Primer extension analysis identified two partially overlapping promoters which were responsible for the divergent expression of the betT gene and betIBA operon. The transcripts are initiated 61 bp apart and are induced by osmotic stress, but for full expression choline is required in the growth medium (91, 202, 204). Because the ArcA protein represses the expression of bet genes in E. coli under anaerobiosis, the bet genes are expressed only under aerobic conditions. An arcA mutation caused complete derepression of the bet genes. A similar pattern for derepression by ArcA has been reported previously for other genes (sodA and arcA) which are directly regulated by ArcA (65).
Results from different laboratories suggest that choline regulation but not osmotic regulation of the bet promoters depended on BetI, a TetR family member. This was indicated by the requirement for choline, in addition to osmotic stress, for betT to be expressed in a mutant strain in which betI was supplied in trans. Furthermore, this choline effect was not seen in cells lacking betI. These findings indicate that betI encodes a repressor that reduced the expression of betT (331).
A chimeric BetI glutathione S-transferase fusion protein (BetI*) was purified, and gel mobility shift assays showed that BetI* formed a complex with a 41-bp DNA fragment carrying the intergenic betI promoter region. Footprinting revealed the presence of two sequences of dyad symmetry which probably constitute the BetI operator.
Streptomycetes are filamentous, soil-living, gram-positive bacteria characterized for their ability to produce a wide variety of secondary metabolites, including antibiotics and biologically active substances, and for their complex morphological differentiation culminating in the formation of chains of spores (55). Secondary metabolite synthesis is sometimes called “physiological” differentiation because it occurs during the idiophase after the main period of rapid vegetative growth and assimilative metabolism (139, 153, 291).
The ultimate regulator of the mentioned processes in Streptomyces griseus is a homodimeric protein called A-factor receptor protein (ArpA) (155-158), which regulates the switch for physiological and morphological differentiation. The main biologically significant target of ArpA is the adpA gene. The AdpA protein in turn controls the expression of other genes. These genes include strR, which serves as a pathway-specific transcriptional activator for streptomycin biosynthetic genes (278); an open reading frame encoding a probable pathway-specific regulator for a polyketide compound (441); adsA, which encodes an extracytoplasmic function sigma factor of RNA polymerase essential for aerial mycelium formation (438); sgmA, which encodes a metalloendopeptidase probably involved in apoptosis of substrate hyphae during aerial mycelium development (174); ssgA, which encodes a small acidic protein essential for spore septum formation (437); amfR, essential for aerial hyphae formation (398, 440); and the sprT and sprU genes, which encode trypsin-like proteases (173).
In vitro, ArpA binds its target DNA site at the −10/−35 region, which is a 22-bp palindrome (5′-GG(T/C)CGGT(A/T)(T/C)G(T/G)-3′). Addition of γ-butyrolactone effector to the ArpA-DNA complex immediately releases ArpA from the DNA. A mutant strain deficient in ArpA or producing a mutant ArpA protein unable to bind to its target DNA overproduces streptomycin and forms aerial mycelia and spores earlier than the wild-type strain (282, 283). An amino acid replacement at Val-41 to Ala in ArpA in the HTH motif at the N-terminal portion of ArpA abolished DNA binding activity but not γ-butyrolactone binding activity, suggesting the involvement of this HTH in DNA binding. On the other hand, mutation of Trp-119 (Trp 119→Ala) generated a mutant unable to bind the γ-butyrolactone, resulting in a mutant protein that did not sense the presence of A-factor. These data suggest that ArpA consists of an HTH DNA-binding at the N-terminal end and an effector binding domain at the C-terminal end of the protein.
In the streptomycin biosynthetic gene cluster in S. griseus, StrR is the pathway-specific regulator that serves as a transcriptional activator for the other genes in the cluster (320). Expression of the strR gene was controlled by the AdpA protein, which binds the region upstream of the strR promoter and activates its transcription (311, 312). adpA knockout mutants produced no streptomycin, and overexpression of adpA caused the wild-type S. griseus strain to produce streptomycin at an earlier growth stage in a larger amount. This set of events explains how A-factor triggers streptomycin biosynthesis.
Disruption of the chromosomal adsA gene encoding σAdsA resulted in loss of aerial hypha formation but not streptomycin production, indicating that this sigma factor is involved in morphological development (401, 438).
Several receptor proteins for γ-butyrolactone-type autoregulators have been described in other species of Streptomyces. For example, CprA and CprB are involved in secondary metabolism and aerial mycelium formation in S. coelicolor A3(2) (284). The virginiae butanolyde receptor BarA is involved in virginiamycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces virginiae (280), and the IM-2 receptor, FarA is involved in blue pigment production in another Streptomyces strain (413).
FarA in Streptomyces lavendulae senses the concentration of γ-butyrolactone IM-2 and also transduces this signal, thus derepressing antibiotic and blue pigment biosynthesis. In addition, FarA also seems to be necessary for IM-2 biosynthesis (Fig. (Fig.8J8J).
The role of ScbR protein in the quorum-sensing circuit of Streptomyces coelicolor is similar to that of FarA in S. lavendulae. ScbR is also involved in three functions: positively regulating SCB1 synthesis (the γ-butyrolactone that acts as signal), receiving the signal, and transducing this signal, thereby derepressing the production of the antibiotics actinorhodin and U-prodigiosin (Fig. (Fig.8M8M).
The development of cholera in humans is directly related to the production of two virulence factors: toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP), which mediates colonization, and cholera toxin (CT), responsible for the severe diarrhea, characteristic of this disease. The coordinated expression of TCP and CT occurs though a complex regulatory cascade (Fig. (Fig.8S)8S) in which the regulators AphA and AphB synergistically activate tcpPH transcription (194). The TetR family protein HapR negatively regulates the expression of AphA and indirectly diminishes the production of TCP and CT.
HapR, in turn, is regulated by quorum-sensing signals that are sensed and transmitted by LuxO. The quorum-sensing apparatus in Vibrio cholerae is unusually complex and is composed of three parallel signaling systems (247). In contrast to other bacteria, in which high cell density triggers virulence gene expression, in Vibrio cholerae low cell density is the condition that activates the production of the pathogenic factors CT and TCP (455). At high cell density HapR positively regulates the expression of a hemagglutinin protease (Hap) that promotes detachment of Vibrio cholerae from the gastrointestinal epithelium (365) and exerts a negative effect on biofilm formation. Taking into account the regulatory functions of HapR and considering that some pathogenic biotypes lose HapR expression whereas others lose the aphA binding site, it appears that HapR expression is related to diminished toxicity and colonization capacity. These features offer potentially fruitful avenues of research to design drugs to modulate Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity.
Within the genus Vibrio, some TetR family proteins, i.e., LuxT, LuxR, and LitR, are involved in complex quorum-sensing circuits. In Vibrio harveyi, LuxT and LuxR participate in the circuit that regulates luminescence. This strain senses two autoinducers, AI-1 and AI-2 (58, 216). AI-1 is an acyl-homoserine lactone, as in other gram-negative bacteria. However, AI-2 is a novel autoinducer produced by many species that appears to be related to interspecies cell density detection. These two autoinducers use the same phosphorelay system to transduce the signal for bioluminescence regulation. Expression of luxR is in turn regulated by LitR (Fig. (Fig.8R8R).
The Tet system is at present the most widely used system for conditional gene expression in eukaryotic cells (37). The system is based in the high affinity (10−9 M) of TetR for its operator, tetO, the favorable pharmacokinetics of tetracyclines (they diffuse through biological membranes), and their long record of safe clinical use. Cloning of the tetO elements adjacent to the TATA box of the target gene (114) was used successfully to control genes expressed by RNA polymerase I in Leishmania donovani and by RNA polymerase III in yeast and plant cells (76, 400). However, this system is not efficient in mammalian cells. For this reason, and based on the knowledge acquired about how TetR binds to its target operator, several chimeric versions of TetR fused to eukaryotic regulatory domains were constructed, such as the acidic activation domain (tTA) (22, 115, 403) and repression domains (tTS) (33, 336). Based on hybrid transregulators, transgenic mice able to produce diphtheria toxin or the regulated expression of Shiga toxin β to induce apoptosis in mammalian fibroblastic cells were obtained.
The tet system has also been used to study cancer and neurological disorders (95, 98, 419). In the future, advances to approach multifactorial biological processes like development and diseases are expected, which will be relevant for the treatment of complex diseases (37).
Solvent efflux pumps generally exhibit a broad substrate specificity, but some of them are highly specific and remove a certain number of chemicals. One such efflux pumps is the TtgABC pump of Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E, which removes toluene, m-xylene, and propylbenzene as well as styrene and other aromatic hydrocarbons (327) in addition to several antibiotics. This efflux pump is under the control of the drug binding repressor TtgR, a member of the TetR family (391), and has applications in the safe development of solvent-resistant bacteria. Therefore, it is potentially suitable for the biotransformation of water-insoluble compounds into added-value products. One such system has been exploited to produce catechols from xylenes/toluenes in double-phase systems (328). Because these efflux systems are energy consuming, their expression in heterologous hosts has to be tightly controlled by their cognate repressor, which in turn has to be able to respond to the presence of the aromatic solvent. These types of pumps are presumed to be useful if transferred to a wide variety of bacteria that carry suitable biotransformation machineries.
As shown in Fig. Fig.8,8, TetR family members are key players in multidrug resistance, virulence, and pathogenicity processes in certain bacterial pathogens. The development of drugs that bind irreversibly to the repressors and prevent their release from their cognate operators may be a strategy to fight these pathogens. Suitable screening procedures to search for these drugs can be envisaged based on current tools for gram-negative bacteria (74).
Work in our laboratories was supported by EC grants MIFRIEND QLK3-CT 2000-017 and BIOCARTE QLRT-2001-01923 and projects CICYT-2003 (BIO2003-00515) and Petri-NBT (PTR1995-0653 PO) to J.L.R. and grant 0021/2002 from the Human Frontier Science Program to M.T.G., K.W., and X.Z.
We thank W. Hindrich and S. Horinouchi for comments on the article. We thank Inés Abril and Carmen Lorente for secretarial assistance and Karen Shashok for checking the use of English in the manuscript. R. Tobes acknowledges support from Eduardo Pareja.