Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
Health Serv Res. 2000 December; 35(5 Pt 1): 1037–1057.
PMCID: PMC1089182

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening.


OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the costs of implementing a church-based, telephone-counseling program for increasing mammography use, and to identify the components of costs and the likely cost-effectiveness in hypothetical communities with varying characteristics. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: An ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of 1,443 women recruited from 45 churches participating in the Los Angeles Mammography Promotion (LAMP) program were followed from 1995 to 1997. STUDY DESIGN: Churches were stratified into blocks and randomized into three intervention arms-telephone counseling, mail counseling, and control. We surveyed participants before and after the intervention to collect data on mammography use and demographic characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We used call records, activity reports, and interviews to collect data on the time and materials needed to organize and carry out the intervention. We constructed a standard model of costs and cost-effectiveness based on these data and the Year One results of the LAMP program. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The cost in materials and overhead to the church site was $10.89 per participant and $188 per additional screening. However, when the estimated cost for church volunteers' time was included, the cost of the intervention increased substantially. CONCLUSIONS: A church-based program to promote the use of mammography would be feasible for many churches with the use of volunteer labor and resources.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bird JA, McPhee SJ, Jenkins C, Fordham D. Three strategies to promote cancer screening. How feasible is wide-scale implementation? Med Care. 1990 Nov;28(11):1005–1012. [PubMed]
  • Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):62–67. [PubMed]
  • Brown ML, Fintor L. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993;25(2):113–118. [PubMed]
  • Castro FG, Elder J, Coe K, Tafoya-Barraza HM, Moratto S, Campbell N, Talavera G. Mobilizing churches for health promotion in Latino communities: Compañeros en la Salud. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;(18):127–135. [PubMed]
  • Davis NA, Lewis MJ, Rimer BK, Harvey CM, Koplan JP. Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(4):247–249. [PubMed]
  • Feldman RH, Damron D, Anliker J, Ballesteros RD, Langenberg P, DiClemente C, Havas S. The effect of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day promotion program on participants' stages of change for fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):649–663. [PubMed]
  • Derose KP, Fox SA, Reigadas E, Hawes-Dawson J. Church-based telephone mammography counseling with peer counselors. J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):175–188. [PubMed]
  • Duan N, Fox SA, Derose KP, Carson S. Maintaining mammography adherence through telephone counseling in a church-based trial. Am J Public Health. 2000 Sep;90(9):1468–1471. [PubMed]
  • Eastman P. NCI adopts new mammography screening guidelines for women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Apr 16;89(8):538–539. [PubMed]
  • Eddy DM. Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):389–399. [PubMed]
  • Fireman BH, Quesenberry CP, Somkin CP, Jacobson AS, Baer D, West D, Potosky AL, Brown ML. Cost of care for cancer in a health maintenance organization. Health Care Financ Rev. 1997 Summer;18(4):51–76. [PubMed]
  • Fox SA, Klos DS, Tsou CV. Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):431–433. [PubMed]
  • Fox SA, Siu AL, Stein JA. The importance of physician communication on breast cancer screening of older women. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 26;154(18):2058–2068. [PubMed]
  • Fox SA, Pitkin K, Paul C, Carson S, Duan N. Breast cancer screening adherence: does church attendance matter? Health Educ Behav. 1998 Dec;25(6):742–758. [PubMed]
  • Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40(1):37–51. [PubMed]
  • Kattlove H, Liberati A, Keeler E, Brook RH. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):142–148. [PubMed]
  • Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149–154. [PubMed]
  • Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Jan-Feb;49(1):8–1. [PubMed]
  • Larsson LG, Nyström L, Wall S, Rutqvist L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, Tabár L. The Swedish randomised mammography screening trials: analysis of their effect on the breast cancer related excess mortality. J Med Screen. 1996;3(3):129–132. [PubMed]
  • Logigian MK. Productivity analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 1987 May;41(5):285–291. [PubMed]
  • Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. J Fam Pract. 1995 Feb;40(2):162–171. [PubMed]
  • Nyström L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Rydén S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973–978. [PubMed]
  • Ransdell LB. Church-based health promotion: an untapped resource for women 65 and older. Am J Health Promot. 1995 May-Jun;9(5):333–336. [PubMed]
  • Rimer BK. Interventions to increase breast screening. Lifespan and ethnicity issues. Cancer. 1994 Jul 1;74(1 Suppl):323–328. [PubMed]
  • Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH, 3rd, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer. 1995 Apr 1;75(7):1619–1626. [PubMed]
  • Taplin SH, Barlow W, Urban N, Mandelson MT, Timlin DJ, Ichikawa L, Nefcy P. Stage, age, comorbidity, and direct costs of colon, prostate, and breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Mar 15;87(6):417–426. [PubMed]
  • Thomas SB, Quinn SC, Billingsley A, Caldwell C. The characteristics of northern black churches with community health outreach programs. Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):575–579. [PubMed]
  • Tuggle MB., 2nd New insights and challenges about churches as intervention sites to reach the African-American community with health information. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 Aug;87(8 Suppl):635–637. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Urban N, Self S, Kessler L, Prentice R, Henderson M, Iverson D, Thompson D, Byar D, Insull W, Gorbach SL, et al. Analysis of the costs of a large prevention trial. Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):129–146. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust