PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
 
Health Serv Res. 1999 June; 34(2): 623–640.
PMCID: PMC1089026

Patient assessments of hospital maternity care: a useful tool for consumers?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine three issues related to using patient assessments of care as a means to select hospitals and foster consumer choice-specifically, whether patient assessments (1) vary across hospitals, (2) are reproducible over time, and (3) are biased by case-mix differences. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Surveys that were mailed to 27,674 randomly selected patients admitted to 18 hospitals in a large metropolitan region (Northeast Ohio) for labor and delivery in 1992-1994. We received completed surveys from 16,051 patients (58 percent response rate). STUDY DESIGN: Design was a repeated cross-sectional study. DATA COLLECTION: Surveys were mailed approximately 8 to 12 weeks after discharge. We used three previously validated scales evaluating patients' global assessments of care (three items)as well as assessments of physician (six items) and nursing (five items) care. Each scale had a possible range of 0 (poor care) to 100 (excellent care). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Patient assessments varied (p<.001) across hospitals for each scale. Mean hospital scores were higher or lower (p<.01) than the sample mean for seven or more hospitals during each year of data collection. However, within individual hospitals, mean scores were reproducible over the three years. In addition, relative hospital rankings were stable; Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.85 to 0.96 when rankings during individual years were compared. Patient characteristics (age, race, education, insurance status, health status, type of delivery) explained only 2-3 percent of the variance in patient assessments, and adjusting scores for these factors had little effect on hospitals' scores. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that patient assessments of care may be a sensitive measure for discriminating among hospitals. In addition, hospital scores are reproducible and not substantially affected by case-mix differences. If our findings regarding patient assessments are generalizable to other patient populations and delivery settings, these measures may be a useful tool for consumers in selecting hospitals or other healthcare providers.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Adler GS. Medicare beneficiaries rate their medical care: new data from the MCBS (Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey). Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):175–187. [PubMed]
  • Aharony L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49–79. [PubMed]
  • Bentley JM, Nash DB. How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released reports on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jan;24(1):40–49. [PubMed]
  • Carey RG, Seibert JH. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity. Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):834–845. [PubMed]
  • Carr-Hill RA. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):236–249. [PubMed]
  • Chang BL, Uman GC, Linn LS, Ware JE, Jr, Kane RL. The effect of systematically varying components of nursing care on satisfaction in elderly ambulatory women. West J Nurs Res. 1984 Fall;6(4):367–386. [PubMed]
  • Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, Moloney TW, McMullen W, Walker JD, Delbanco TL. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 1991 Winter;10(4):254–267. [PubMed]
  • Davies AR, Ware JE, Jr, Brook RH, Peterson JR, Newhouse JP. Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-for-service medical care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Serv Res. 1986 Aug;21(3):429–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dull VT, Lansky D, Davis N. Evaluating a patient satisfaction survey for maximum benefit. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):444–453. [PubMed]
  • Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):323–329. [PubMed]
  • Friedman MA. Issues in measuring and improving health care quality. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):1–13. [PubMed]
  • Gold M, Wooldridge J. Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care quality: current practices. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):155–173. [PubMed]
  • Hays RD, Nelson EC, Rubin HR, Ware JE, Jr, Meterko M. Further evaluations of the PJHQ scales. Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9 Suppl):S29–S39. [PubMed]
  • Hertz P, Stamps PL. Appointment-keeping behavior re-evaluated. Am J Public Health. 1977 Nov;67(11):1033–1036. [PubMed]
  • Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. What type of quality information do consumers want in a health care report card? Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Mar;53(1):28–47. [PubMed]
  • Hulka BS, Zyzanski SJ, Cassel JC, Thompson SJ. Scale for the measurement of attitudes toward physicians and primary medical care. Med Care. 1970 Sep-Oct;8(5):429–436. [PubMed]
  • Koehler WF, Fottler MD, Swan JE. Physician-patient satisfaction: equity in the health services encounter. Med Care Rev. 1992 Winter;49(4):455–484. [PubMed]
  • Lasek RJ, Barkley W, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE. An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care. 1997 Jun;35(6):646–652. [PubMed]
  • Linn MW, Linn BS, Stein SR. Satisfaction with ambulatory care and compliance in older patients. Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):606–614. [PubMed]
  • Longo DR, Land G, Schramm W, Fraas J, Hoskins B, Howell V. Consumer reports in health care. Do they make a difference in patient care? JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1579–1584. [PubMed]
  • Marquis MS, Davies AR, Ware JE., Jr Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care. 1983 Aug;21(8):821–829. [PubMed]
  • Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1693–1697. [PubMed]
  • Meterko M, Rubin HR. Patient judgments of hospital quality. A taxonomy. Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9 Suppl):S10–S14. [PubMed]
  • Nelson EC, Larson CO, Hays RD, Nelson SA, Ward D, Batalden PB. The physician and employee judgment system: reliability and validity of a hospital quality measurement method. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992 Sep;18(9):284–292. [PubMed]
  • Nelson EC, Hays RD, Larson C, Batalden PB. The patient judgment system: reliability and validity. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Jun;15(6):185–191. [PubMed]
  • Rosenthal GE, Harper DL. Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Aug;20(8):425–442. [PubMed]
  • Rossiter LF, Langwell K, Wan TT, Rivnyak M. Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. JAMA. 1989 Jul 7;262(1):57–63. [PubMed]
  • Rubin HR. Patient evaluations of hospital care. A review of the literature. Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9 Suppl):S3–S9. [PubMed]
  • Rubin HR, Ware JE, Jr, Nelson EC, Meterko M. The Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) Questionnaire. Med Care. 1990 Sep;28(9 Suppl):S17–S18. [PubMed]
  • Rubin HR, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, McHorney CA, Ware JE., Jr Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1993 Aug 18;270(7):835–840. [PubMed]
  • Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 25;335(4):251–256. [PubMed]
  • Shimshak DG, DeFuria MC, DiGiorgio JJ, Getson J. Controlling disenrollment in health maintenance organizations. Health Care Manage Rev. 1988 Winter;13(1):47–55. [PubMed]
  • Sisk JE, Gorman SA, Reisinger AL, Glied SA, DuMouchel WH, Hynes MM. Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use. JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50–55. [PubMed]
  • Vuori H, Aaku T, Aine E, Erkko R, Johansson R. Doctor-patient relationship in the light of patients' experiences. Soc Sci Med. 1972 Dec;6(6):723–730. [PubMed]
  • Ware JE, Jr, Davies AR. Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):291–297. [PubMed]
  • Ware JE, Jr, Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988 Apr;26(4):393–402. [PubMed]
  • Willson P, McNamara JR. How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(19):1699–1704. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust