PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
 
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 March 7; 268(1466): 471–477.
PMCID: PMC1088629

Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea.

Abstract

It has been suggested that the socially parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon detects ant odours before ovipositing on initial larval food plants near colonies of its obligate ant host Myrmica ruginodis. It has also been suggested that overcrowding on food plants near M. ruginodis is avoided by an ability to detect high egg loads, resulting in a switch to selecting plants near less suitable ant species. If confirmed, this hypothesis (H1) would have serious implications for the application of current population models aimed at the conservation of endangered Maculinea species, which are based on the null hypothesis (H0) that females randomly select food plants whose flower buds are at a precise phenological stage, making oviposition independent of ants. If H1 were wrong, practical management based upon its assumptions could lead to the extinction of protected populations. We present data for the five European species of Maculinea which show that (i) each oviposits on a phenologically restricted flower-bud stage, which accounts for the apparent host-ant-mediated niche separation in sympatric populations of Maculinea nausithous and Maculinea teleius, (ii) there is no temporal shift in oviposition by Maculinea arion in relation to host ant distribution or egg density, and (iii) oviposition patterns in 13 populations of M. alcon's closest relative, Macaulinea rebeli, conform to H0 not H1 predictions. It is concluded that conservation measures should continue to be based on H0.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Akino T, Knapp JJ, Thomas JA, Elmes GW. Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 22;266(1427):1419–1419. [PMC free article]
  • Clarke RT, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME. The effects of spatial patterns in habitat quality on community dynamics within a site. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):347–354. [PMC free article]
  • Schönrogge K, Wardlaw JC, Thomas JA, Elmes GW. Polymorphic growth rates in myrmecophilous insects. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):771–777. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC. Polymorphic growth in larvae of the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Oct 7;265(1408):1895–1901. [PMC free article]
  • van Dyck H, Oostermeijer JG, Talloen W, Feenstra V, van der Hidde A, Wynhoff I. Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc Biol Sci. 2000 May 7;267(1446):861–866. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society