Shigella species are the causative agents of bacillary dysentery, a disease characterized by bacterial invasion of and multiplication within human colonic epithelial cells (
5,
45).
Shigella binding to epithelial cells engages a complex signaling cascade which includes bacterium-mediated endocytosis, lysis of the membrane-bound phagocytic vacuole, growth of the bacteria within the cytoplasmic compartment, and intercellular spreading by using the host cytoskeleton as a motor (
6,
13,
25,
45). Moreover, recent studies have indicated that in both in vitro (
35) and in vivo (
41) models of
Shigella invasion of intestinal epithelium, invasion occurs preferentially from the basolateral epithelial membrane domain. Hence, the ability of invasive bacteria to reach the basolateral surface of enterocytes seems to be a crucial step in
Shigella pathogenesis and is consistent with the observation that invading
Shigella bacteria which reach the underlying lamina propria evoke an intense inflammatory response (
11). Therefore, we sought to determine whether interfacing
Shigella with the basolateral epithelial membrane domain of polarized intestinal T84 epithelial cells (i.e., the same surface mediating
Shigella invasion) promoted the generation of discrete signals necessary to elicit PMN transepithelial migration. These findings identify three integral components of
Shigella pathogenesis essential for the initiation of signals required for the movement of PMN across cultured intestinal epithelial monolayers. First, this signaling response to subepithelial PMN exhibited a strict dependence on
Shigella contact with the epithelial basolateral membrane domain. Second, such signaling required the participation of the 220-kb virulence plasmid. Third, the ability of
Shigella to induce signals involved in the transepithelial migration of PMN requires a functional type III secretion apparatus in which Ipa proteins are essential.
Little is known about the nature of
Shigella-induced signaling cascades and protein(s) directly involved in evoking the transepithelial signal to neutrophils during active states of enterocolitis. A relevant paradigm is the concept that epithelial orchestration of PMN movement induced by
Salmonella typhimurium is mediated by polarized secretion of distinct chemokines (
28–
30). After apical epithelial cell-
S. typhimurium contact, the intestinal epithelium secretes chemokines which play an essential role in recruiting PMN from the peripheral circulation and directing them to migrate across the epithelium to the intestinal lumen (
28–
30). Unlike
S. typhimurium, the capacity of
S. flexneri to reach the basolateral surface of enterocytes is an essential step in
Shigella pathogenesis. How
S. flexneri penetrates the intestinal mucosa to reach the basolateral surface of the epithelium has been an area of intense interest. One possibility is that
Shigella bacteria interact with specialized cells, termed M cells, which lie over the Peyer patches (
41,
46,
55). These cells function to continually endocytose macromolecules as well as microorganisms from the intestinal lumen. Thus, as a result of M-cell-mediated entry,
Shigella bacteria are able to gain access to the basolateral epithelial cell domain. Consistent with these observations, our studies demonstrate that only wild-type
S. flexneri strains, when interfaced at the basolateral epithelial membrane domain of intestinal epithelial cell monolayers, generated the appropriate set of signals to drive PMN across the intestinal epithelium. Given that the critical step in
Shigella pathogenesis is the ability of the organism to access the basolateral surface of enterocytes, it is not surprising that we were unable to detect measurable amounts of PMN transmigration on exposure of
Shigella bacteria to the apical epithelial membrane domain. Our results, however, are in contrast to the findings of Perdomo et al. (
42), who reported that apical surface contact by wild-type and plasmid-cured strains of
S. flexneri showed an equal ability to induce PMN to transmigrate through a confluent epithelial cell monolayer.
Since only virulent
S. flexneri could induce PMN transepithelial migration, we were able to examine
Shigella-elicited factors which might drive this response. Notably, we found that
Shigella-induced PMN transmigration is dependent upon the presence of the 220-kb virulence plasmid. Strains cured of this plasmid are avirulent and noninvasive and, as we demonstrate in this study, fail to induce signaling to subepithelial PMN. Since Perdomo et al. (
42) could not detect this difference in behavior between virulent and avirulent
S. flexneri strains, our data reveal a previously unrecognized phenotype associated with
Shigella virulence (i.e., the ability to induce PMN transepithelial migration). Such conflicting results cannot be attributed to strain differences. We used the same isogenic pair of plasmid-containing and plasmid-cured strains (M90T and BS176, respectively) as Perdomo et al. (
42) and found no PMN induction with the plasmid-cured strain. However, there are two principal differences between our investigation and that by Perdomo et al. First our studies assessed
Shigella-epithelial cell interactions from the basolateral membrane domain rather than the apical membrane domain. Given that the entry of
S. flexneri into the intestinal barrier occurs via the M cells of follicle-associated epithelium and given that the ability of invasive
Shigella to reach the basolateral surface of enterocytes seems to be a crucial step in
Shigella pathogenesis, we reasoned, and show in this report, that
Shigella-basolateral epithelial cell interactions have a profound effect on the ability of the bacteria to induce an inflammatory response. Second, the interpretation of PMN transepithelial migration differs between our study and that of Perdomo et al. (
42). In the gastrointestinal tract, active inflammatory disease characterized by migration of neutrophils across the epithelial lining is a hallmark of both chronic and self-limited diseases (
20,
58). To reach the epithelial surface, PMN must travel out of the vascular blood where they encounter matrix components, basement membrane, and finally the epithelium. Still, to cross the intestinal epithelium, PMN must traverse the paracellular space, impale epithelial tight junctions, and move into the luminal compartment (
20,
37,
43,
51,
58), where they can interact with the apical epithelial membrane. The sum of these events results in crypt abscesses. In patients with active inflammation, the degree of PMN transepithelial migration correlates with the severity of symptoms (
20,
58). Therefore, we define PMN transepithelial migration according to this histopathological definition as those PMN which have completely traversed the monolayer, impaled epithelial tight junctions, and are thus located in the apical epithelial cell compartment. In contrast, Perdomo et al. measured PMN which were associated only with the monolayer (filter) at the basolateral pole, since the number of PMN that traversed the monolayer and appeared in the apical reservoir was too small to be detected and thus largely represents PMN which have migrated only into the monolayer but have not yet crossed the tight junction and hence are trapped in the paracellular and subepithelial spaces (
20,
39,
40,
58).
Genes in the
Shigella ipa operon (
ipaBCD) play crucial roles in the invasion of epithelial cells by
Shigella. Mutants unable to synthesize the Ipa proteins not only are incapable of eliciting rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton around bacterial attachment sites on epithelial cells but also are incapable of disrupting the phagocytic vacuoles surrounding invading bacteria. Secretion of Ipa invasins into the bacterial environment is mediated by the Mxi and Spa proteins (
1–
4,
54), which form a type III protein secretion system (
53). Moreover, secretion of Ipa invasins from
Shigella occurs more efficiently upon contact with the basolateral surface of polarized intestinal epithelial cells (
32,
57). Although plasmid-cured strains of
Shigella failed to elicit transepithelial signaling to PMN, it was not clear whether this signaling event was dependent on the genes in the contiguous
ipa,
mxi, and
spa operons. We show that
Shigella strains which either harbor independent mutations in the type III secretion apparatus or fail to make Ipa proteins were unable to initiate the signals required for directed PMN transepithelial migration. Collectively, these observations strongly suggest that transepithelial signaling to PMN is a central virulence mechanism for
Shigella-elicited enteritis and depends on plasmid-located genes involved in tissue invasion and secretion of bacterial proteins that mediate invasion. Future experiments should resolve the respective contributions of invasion and type III secretion dependence, imperative for the induction of signals involved in PMN transepithelial migration.
This work identifies a novel
Shigella virulence mechanism. We demonstrate that upon
S. flexneri-basolateral epithelial cell interactions, basolateral-to-apical directed PMN transepithelial migration ensues, reflecting events relevant to those which occur in the human intestine during acute stages of inflammation. We have previously developed an in vitro model of PMN-intestinal epithelium interactions to investigate the influence of contact of
S. typhimurium with intestinal epithelial apical membranes on the subsequent inflammatory response. While we do not completely understand how
Salmonella and
Shigella induce inflammatory responses, if differences exist they may be because the host cellular events and the signals elicited upon infection by these microorganisms are distinct. For example,
Shigella entry into epithelial cells occurs from the basolateral pole and appears to be mediated by the small GTPase rho (
56) while
Salmonella entry occurs predominantly from the apical pole and is mediated by another GTPase, CDC42 (
7). What is clear, however, is that interactions between intestinal epithelial cells and enteric pathogens play a key role in orchestrating the inflammatory response. Significantly, future studies will add to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms important in the regulation of active inflammation characterized by shigellosis and salmonellosis. Perhaps by studying
Shigella we will add to our understanding of
Salmonella inflammation and vice versa. Furthermore, the most interesting studies may be those that show differences between these important bacterial pathogens.