PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
 
Health Serv Res. 1998 August; 33(3 Pt 1): 489–511.
PMCID: PMC1070273

Does hospital procedure-specific volume affect treatment costs? A national study of knee replacement surgery.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The long-run cost savings potential of private sector reform efforts, such as selective contracts with providers, depends in part on the relationship between procedure-specific volume and average hospital resources that are consumed in treating patients associated with that specific procedure. Study examines a model that estimates the relationship between hospital procedure-specific volume and average hospital treatment costs, using an elective surgical procedure as an example. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) files for 1989 for hospitalizations in which a Medicare beneficiary received a knee replacement (KR) surgery during 1989. Hospital information was obtained from the American Hospital Association's 1989 Annual Survey. All patient-level data were aggregated to the hospital level to create a data file, with the hospital as the unit of observation. STUDY DESIGN: This study used administrative claims data and regression analysis to estimate the effect of hospital procedure-specific volume on average hospital treatment costs of patients receiving KR surgery. We also examined the stability of the volume-cost relationship across hospitals of different sizes. PRINCIPAL FINDING: The average treatment costs associated with KR surgery are inversely related to a hospital's KR volume in the regression equation estimated using all hospitals performing KR surgery. The inverse relationship between cost and volume is found to be robust for different-size hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The potential cost savings associated with performing KR surgery at incrementally higher hospital volume level can amount to as much as 10 percent of the hospital's average treatment cost. However, the incremental cost savings associated with increased patient volume depends on the hospital's current volume level and its size.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bradbury RC, Golec JH, Steen PM. Relating hospital health outcomes and resource expenditures. Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):56–65. [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613–619. [PubMed]
  • Fleming ST. The relationship between the cost and quality of hospital care: a review of the literature. Med Care Rev. 1990 Winter;47(4):487–502. [PubMed]
  • Flood AB, Scott WR, Ewy W. Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories. Med Care. 1984 Feb;22(2):98–114. [PubMed]
  • Freund DA, Dittus RS, Fitzgerald J, Heck D. Assessing and improving outcomes: total knee replacement. Health Serv Res. 1990 Dec;25(5):723–726. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hannan EL, O'Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989 Jul 28;262(4):503–510. [PubMed]
  • Hughes RG, Garnick DW, Luft HS, McPhee SJ, Hunt SS. Hospital volume and patient outcomes. The case of hip fracture patients. Med Care. 1988 Nov;26(11):1057–1067. [PubMed]
  • Lave JR, Pashos CL, Anderson GF, Brailer D, Bubolz T, Conrad D, Freund DA, Fox SH, Keeler E, Lipscomb J, et al. Costing medical care: using Medicare administrative data. Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7 Suppl):JS77–JS89. [PubMed]
  • Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. [PubMed]
  • Luft HS, Garnick DW, Mark DH, Peltzman DJ, Phibbs CS, Lichtenberg E, McPhee SJ. Does quality influence choice of hospital? JAMA. 1990 Jun 6;263(21):2899–2906. [PubMed]
  • Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):157–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Maerki SC, Luft HS, Hunt SS. Selecting categories of patients for regionalization. Implications of the relationship between volume and outcome. Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):148–158. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust