PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
 
Health Serv Res. 1998 February; 32(6): 825–839.
PMCID: PMC1070235

Practice variation in the use of interventions in high-risk obstetrics.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between clinical, demographic, and site-of-care factors and the use of tocolysis and corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of premature labor. DATA SOURCE: Secondary clinical and demographic data collected for the five-center March of Dimes Prematurity Prevention clinical trial, 1983-1986. STUDY DESIGN: We used logistic regression analysis in assessing the clinical, patient, and care site factors associated with the use of tocolysis and corticosteroid therapy during episodes of premature labor occurring to women enrolled in the trial. The two interventions were not subject to control in the trial, but were provided according to customary practice at the care site. DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 4,625 episodes of labor occurring before 37 weeks gestation were identified from either preterm labor or preterm delivery records recorded for the 33,792 women enrolled in the trial. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The use of tocolysis, an intervention that attempts to control premature labor contractions and that was widely used in high-risk obstetrics, varied almost exclusively by clinical factors. The use of corticosteroid therapy, a little used but effective intervention that reduces respiratory complications in premature infants, varied significantly by site of care and was used less frequently across sites and clinical conditions for minority group patients. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the premise that practice variation on the basis of nonclinical factors occurs more commonly for interventions where there is more uncertainty about clinical indications and effectiveness. The study also identifies another area of clinical care in which the use of aggressive and relatively uncertain interventions is provided less frequently to minority group patients.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Amon E, Shyken JM, Sibai BM. How small is too small and how early is too early? A survey of American obstetricians specializing in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 1992 Jan;9(1):17–21. [PubMed]
  • Baruffi G, Dellinger WS, Jr, Strobino DM, Rudolph A, Timmons RG, Ross A. Patterns of obstetric procedures use in maternity care. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Oct;64(4):493–498. [PubMed]
  • Bronstein JM, Goldenberg RL. Practice variation in the use of corticosteroids: a comparison of eight data sets. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):296–298. [PubMed]
  • Capeless EL, Mead PB. Management of preterm premature rupture of membranes: lack of a national consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jul;157(1):11–12. [PubMed]
  • Chalmers I. Underuse of antenatal corticosteroids and future litigation. Lancet. 1993 Mar 13;341(8846):699–699. [PubMed]
  • Ford ES, Cooper RS. Racial/ethnic differences in health care utilization of cardiovascular procedures: a review of the evidence. Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1 Pt 2):237–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hamvas A, Wise PH, Yang RK, Wampler NS, Noguchi A, Maurer MM, Walentik CA, Schramm WF, Cole FS. The influence of the wider use of surfactant therapy on neonatal mortality among blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 20;334(25):1635–1640. [PubMed]
  • Hemminki E, Gissler M. Variation in obstetric care within and between hospital levels in Finland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Oct;101(10):851–857. [PubMed]
  • Horner RD, Oddone EZ, Matchar DB. Theories explaining racial differences in the utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cerebrovascular disease. Milbank Q. 1995;73(3):443–462. [PubMed]
  • Iams JD. Obstetric inertia: an obstacle to the prevention of prematurity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):796–799. [PubMed]
  • LaVeist TA. Beyond dummy variables and sample selection: what health services researchers ought to know about race as a variable. Health Serv Res. 1994 Apr;29(1):1–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Leviton LC, Baker S, Hassol A, Goldenberg RL. An exploration of opinion and practice patterns affecting low use of antenatal corticosteroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):312–316. [PubMed]
  • Lomas J, Sisk JE, Stocking B. From evidence to practice in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):405–410. [PubMed]
  • Taslimi MM, Sibai BM, Amon E, Taslimi CK, Herrick CN. A national survey on preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;160(6):1352–1360. [PubMed]
  • Wennberg JE, Barnes BA, Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(7):811–824. [PubMed]
  • Zahniser SC, Kendrick JS, Franks AL, Saftlas AF. Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987. Am J Public Health. 1992 Oct;82(10):1340–1344. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust