Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
Health Serv Res. 1997 August; 32(3): 265–282.
PMCID: PMC1070190

Obstetricians' receptiveness to teen prenatal patients who are Medicaid recipients.


OBJECTIVE: To test the accuracy of various physicians' participation in Medicaid models. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data on 221 obstetricians and gynecologists in the Chicago area by telephone interviews over a four-month period. These data were combined with secondary data from the American Medical Association Master File (1993) and U.S. Census data (1990). STUDY DESIGN: Telephone interviewers posing as the older sisters of a pregnant teenager who is a Medicaid recipient sought information regarding the care provided in a first prenatal care appointment (e.g., appointment duration, tests administered, delivery privileges, appointment availability). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: A "receptionist helpfulness" variable was developed through pretesting on obstetricians in another city. Inter-interviewer reliability was enhanced through common interview technique education. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Only 81 obstetricians (36.7 percent) accepted new Medicaid patients. This finding is lower than previous research on physician participation in Medicaid. There was strong empirical support for both dimensions-cost containment and limited access-of the physicians' receptiveness model, the model introduced with this research. There was limited support for the dual market and residential segregation models of physician participation in Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that this study's research design is more accurate in reflecting the barriers that a pregnant Medicaid-eligible patient encounters when seeking office-based prenatal care. As such, combining the physicians' receptiveness model with other physician participation in Medicaid models provides a more complete picture of access barriers to prenatal care for our most needy populations.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.5M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Buescher PA, Smith C, Holliday JL, Levine RH. Source of prenatal care and infant birth weight: the case of a North Carolina county. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):204–210. [PubMed]
  • Fossett JW, Peterson JA. Physician supply and Medicaid participation. The causes of market failure. Med Care. 1989 Apr;27(4):386–396. [PubMed]
  • Fossett JW, Perloff JD, Peterson JA, Kletke PR. Medicaid in the inner city: the case of maternity care in Chicago. Milbank Q. 1990;68(1):111–141. [PubMed]
  • Makinson C. The health consequences of teenage fertility. Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):132–139. [PubMed]
  • Mitchell JB, Schurman R. Access to private obstetrics/gynecology services under Medicaid. Med Care. 1984 Nov;22(11):1026–1037. [PubMed]
  • Morris L, Warren CW, Aral SO. Measuring adolescent sexual behaviors and related health outcomes. Public Health Rep. 1993;108 (Suppl 1):31–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Perloff JD, Kletke P, Fossett JW. Which physicians limit their Medicaid participation, and why. Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1):7–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ross CE, Duff RS. Returning to the doctor: the effect of client characteristics, type of practice, and experiences with care. J Health Soc Behav. 1982 Jun;23(2):119–131. [PubMed]
  • Stevens-Simon C, Fullar S, McAnarney ER. Tangible differences between adolescent-oriented and adult-oriented prenatal care. J Adolesc Health. 1992 Jun;13(4):298–302. [PubMed]
  • Yudkowsky BK, Cartland JD, Flint SS. Pediatrician participation in Medicaid: 1978 to 1989. Pediatrics. 1990 Apr;85(4):567–577. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust