Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
Health Serv Res. 1985 October; 20(4): 387–405.
PMCID: PMC1068890

Cost-effectiveness implications based on a comparison of nursing home and home health case mix.


Case-mix differences between 653 home health care patients and 650 nursing home patients, and between 455 Medicare home health patients and 447 Medicare nursing home patients were assessed using random samples selected from 20 home health agencies and 46 nursing homes in 12 states in 1982 and 1983. Home health patients were younger, had shorter lengths of stay, and were less functionally disabled than nursing home patients. Traditional long-term care problems requiring personal care were more common among nursing home patients, whereas problems requiring skilled nursing services were more prevalent among home health patients. Considering Medicare patients only, nursing home patients were much more likely to be dependent in activities of daily living (ADLs) than home health patients. Medicare nursing home and home health patients were relatively similar in terms of long-term care problems, and differences in medical problems were less pronounced than between all nursing home and all home health patients. From the standpoint of cost-effectiveness, it would appear that home health care might provide a substitute for acute care hospital use at the end of a hospital stay, and appears to be a more viable option in the care of patients who are not severely disabled and do not have profound functional problems. The Medicare skilled nursing facility, however, is likely to continue to have a crucial role in posthospital care as the treatment modality of choice for individuals who require both highly skilled care and functional assistance.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fox PD, Clauser SB. Trends in nursing home expenditures: implications for aging policy. Health Care Financ Rev. 1980 Fall;2(2):65–70. [PubMed]
  • Gibson RM, Waldo DR. National health expenditures, 1981. Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Sep;4(1):1–35. [PubMed]
  • Keeler EB, Kane RL, Solomon DH. Short- and long-term residents of nursing homes. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):363–370. [PubMed]
  • Liu K, Manton KG. The characteristics and utilization pattern of an admission cohort of nursing home patients (II). Gerontologist. 1984 Feb;24(1):70–76. [PubMed]
  • Hammond J. Home health care cost effectiveness: an overview of the literature. Public Health Rep. 1979 Jul-Aug;94(4):305–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Weiss SM, Worthington PH, Prioleau M, Rosato FE. Home total parenteral nutrition in cancer patients. Cancer. 1982 Sep 15;50(6):1210–1213. [PubMed]
  • Skellie FA, Mobley GM, Coan RE. Cost-effectiveness of community-based long-term care: current findings of Georgia's alternative health services project. Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):353–358. [PubMed]
  • Weissert W, Wan T, Livieratos B, Katz S. Effects and costs of day-care services for the chronically ill: a randomized experiment. Med Care. 1980 Jun;18(6):567–584. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust