Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
Health Serv Res. 1982 Winter; 17(4): 399–419.
PMCID: PMC1068700

Why physicians choose different types of practice settings.


This paper presents an extension of Freidson's typology concerning the four medical practice settings which physicians may enter. First, Freidson's typology is modified to contain only three medical practice settings: 1) solo practices; 2) small group practices (partnerships or associations consisting of two to seven physicians); and, 3) large group practices (having eight or more physicians). Then, it is argued that the most interesting sociological difference between these three medical practice settings is the differential probability for effective peer regulation, with that probability lowest in solo practices, highest in large group practices, and lying somewhere between these extremes in small group practices. Finally, it is argued that because physicians recognize these differential probabilities for peer regulation, they seek out those niches (i.e., medical practice settings) which most closely reflect their preferences. This extended version of Freidsonian theory is then incorporated into an analytic model using the sociodemographic, environmental, and attitudinal characteristics of physicians to predict their practice choices. Data from a 1979 national survey of approximately 4,500 physicians are used to assess the model empirically. The results obtained from these analyses conform quite well with both our general and specific expectations. The implications of these findings for the future configuration of the American health care delivery system are discussed with special reference to health maintenance organizations.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.9M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Parsons T. The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1975 Summer;53(3):257–278. [PubMed]
  • Wolinsky FD, Marder WD. Spending time with patients: the impact of organizational structure on medical practice. Med Care. 1982 Oct;20(10):1051–1059. [PubMed]
  • Wolinsky FD. The performance of Health Maintenance Organizations: an analytic review. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980 Fall;58(4):537–587. [PubMed]
  • Roemer MI, Mera JA, Shonick W. The ecology of group medical practice in the United States. Med Care. 1974 Aug;12(8):627–637. [PubMed]
  • Freshnock LJ, Goodman LJ. Medical group practice in the United States: patterns of survival between 1969 and 1975. J Health Soc Behav. 1979 Dec;20(4):352–362. [PubMed]
  • Chambers EA, Cox DR. Discrimination between alternative binary response models. Biometrika. 1967 Dec;54(3):573–578. [PubMed]
  • Kobashigawa B, Berki SE. Alternative regression approaches to the analysis of medical care survey data. Med Care. 1977 May;15(5):396–408. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust