PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of hsresearchLink to Publisher's site
 
Health Serv Res. 1987 October; 22(4): 553–580.
PMCID: PMC1065456

Health risk appraisal: review of evidence for effectiveness.

Abstract

Since its introduction some two decades ago, health risk appraisal (HRA) has become a standard offering in the health promotion repertoire. The technique's distinctive feature is its use of epidemiologic data to generate quantitative risk messages for the client. Yet despite the dedication and considerable investments that have gone into HRA's development, dissemination, and use, there is only limited empirical evidence that these quantitative risk messages have any effect on clients. There do not appear to be any formal studies of HRA's effect on participation in health promotion programs, although increasing recruitment is regarded as a major benefit of using HRA. There are few indications of HRA effects on health beliefs. Most positive reports of effects on behavior change come from uncontrolled studies; several randomized controlled trials have yielded ambiguous findings. Virtually no data exist concerning the impact of the quantitative risk messages that distinguish HRA from other assessment techniques and that have motivated the substantial efforts toward developing and refining HRA. HRA has evident appeal and is probably a useful health education device for middle-class, middle-aged, nonminority clients. It may well have desirable effects on health-related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors when accompanied by counseling or education, but available evidence has not established its effectiveness. Given the difficulty of obtaining definitive evidence of the effectiveness of HRA and specifically of its use of quantitative risk projections, the need for such evidence is debatable. An adequately funded and reviewed research program to examine whether projections of absolute risk affect knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and intention to change is recommended as the most fruitful next step. Epidemiologically based HRA procedures that provide feedback in terms of qualitative statements or relative risk may be a promising approach to prospective health assessment.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Schoenbach VJ, Wagner EH, Karon JM. The use of epidemiologic data for personal risk assessment in health hazard/health risk appraisal programs. J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(9):625–638. [PubMed]
  • Goetz AA, McTyre RB. Health risk appraisal: some methodologic considerations. Nurs Res. 1981 Sep-Oct;30(5):307–313. [PubMed]
  • Safer MA. An evaluation of the health hazard appraisal based on survey data from a randomly selected population. Public Health Rep. 1982 Jan-Feb;97(1):31–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sacks JJ, Krushat WM, Newman J. Reliability of the health hazard appraisal. Am J Public Health. 1980 Jul;70(7):730–732. [PubMed]
  • Doerr BT, Hutchins EB. Health risk appraisal: process, problems, and prospects for nursing practice and research. Nurs Res. 1981 Sep-Oct;30(5):299–306. [PubMed]
  • Wagner EH, Beery WL, Schoenbach VJ, Graham RM. An assessment of health hazard/health risk appraisal. Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):347–352. [PubMed]
  • Maccoby N, Farquhar JW, Wood PD, Alexander J. Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: effects of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behavior. J Community Health. 1977 Winter;3(2):100–114. [PubMed]
  • McDowell I. Dilemmas in evaluating behaviour-change strategies in disease prevention. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):144–147. [PubMed]
  • Smith WA, Ekdahl SS, Henley CE. Use of Health Hazard Appraisal in counseling for reduction of risk factors. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1985 Dec;85(12):809–814. [PubMed]
  • Spilman MA, Goetz A, Schultz J, Bellingham R, Johnson D. Effects of a corporate health promotion program. J Occup Med. 1986 Apr;28(4):285–289. [PubMed]
  • Green LW. Evaluation and measurement: some dilemmas for health education. Am J Public Health. 1977 Feb;67(2):155–161. [PubMed]
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453–458. [PubMed]
  • Fisher EB., Jr Progress in reducing adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health. 1980 Jul;70(7):678–679. [PubMed]
  • Berkanovic E. Behavioral science and prevention. Prev Med. 1976 Mar;5(1):92–105. [PubMed]
  • Haggerty RJ. Changing lifestyles to improve health. Prev Med. 1977 Jun;6(2):276–289. [PubMed]
  • Jenkins CD. An approach to the diagnosis and treatment of problems of health related behavior. Int J Health Educ. 1979 Apr-Jun;22(2 Suppl):1–24. [PubMed]
  • Marmot M, Winkelstein W., Jr Epidemiologic observations on intervention trials for prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1975 Mar;101(3):177–181. [PubMed]
  • Farrand LL, Holzemer WL, Schleutermann JA. A study of construct validity: simultaneous as a measure of nurse practitioners' problem-solving skills. Nurs Res. 1982 Jan-Feb;31(1):37–42. [PubMed]
  • Smith KW, McKinlay SM, Thorington BD. The validity of health risk appraisal instruments for assessing coronary heart disease risk. Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):419–424. [PubMed]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust