Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Appl Environ Microbiol. Apr 1998; 64(4): 1319–1322.
PMCID: PMC106148
Biodegradation of Metal-EDTA Complexes by an Enriched Microbial Population
Russell A. P. Thomas,1 Kirsten Lawlor,2 Mark Bailey,2 and Lynne E. Macaskie1*
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT,1 and NERC Institute of Virology and Environmental Microbiology, Oxford OX1 3SR,2 United Kingdom
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Biological Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 121-414-5889. Fax: (44) 121-414-6557. E-mail: L.E.Macaskie/at/
Received August 26, 1997; Accepted January 9, 1998.
A mixed culture utilizing EDTA as the sole carbon source was isolated from a mixed inoculum of water from the River Mersey (United Kingdom) and sludge from an industrial effluent treatment plant. Fourteen component organisms were isolated from the culture, including representatives of the genera Methylobacterium, Variovorax, Enterobacter, Aureobacterium, and Bacillus. The mixed culture biodegraded metal-EDTA complexes slowly; the biodegradability was in the order Fe>Cu>Co>Ni>Cd. By incorporation of inorganic phosphate into the medium as a precipitant ligand, heavy metals were removed in parallel to EDTA degradation. The mixed culture also utilized a number of possible EDTA degradation intermediates as carbon sources.
EDTA, an aminopolycarboxylic acid chelating agent, has many applications. For example, it is used in washing powders as a substitute for polyphosphates, which have been implicated in the eutrophication of aquatic environments (11, 12). The large quantities of EDTA used commercially, and its low-level biodegradability (11, 12), allow it to remain at high levels in wastewater (11, 12, 14), from which it is not removed by conventional wastewater treatment, and also to persist in drinking water (10, 14, 36, 37). EDTA is also used for the decontamination of nuclear power plant equipment (3, 20, 23, 31) because it forms very strong complexes with heavy metals and makes them soluble and easy to remove from contaminated surfaces and soils (22, 24). Conversely, if EDTA is not removed from wastes before dumping, it can mobilize metals, e.g., the radionuclides in nuclear waste dumps (8, 31). At the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, Tenn.) and Maxey Flats (Kentucky) sites, radionuclides were detected up to 100 m from the burial site (8, 25), with EDTA-enhanced nuclide migration implicated in nuclide mobilization (24, 25). Radionuclides normally bind to humic and fulvic acids in soil and become immobilized due to the tight complexes formed (7). EDTA prevents this, having a higher affinity for the radionuclides than the humate and fulvate ligands (7). It is now illegal to dump complexing agents together with radionuclides in low-level burial sites in the United States (29); such mixed wastes require pretreatment (13). UV photodegradation of the ferric chelate of EDTA was observed in early studies (16, 17), but extensive photolytic mineralization does not occur (19) and this method of degradation might not be applicable to large volumes. Alternatively, biodegradation can release free metal, allowing this to be concentrated via chemical or biotechnological methods (13).
EDTA is degraded slowly in the environment (6, 35). Its biodegradation was proposed to comprise two pathways (4). The first involves the stepwise removal of acetate groups to leave ethylenediamine and the second involves the stepwise removal of an iminodiacetate (IDA) group, a glycine, and then an ammonium group with nitrilotriacetate (NTA)-aldehyde (4).
An Agrobacterium radiobacter strain able to biodegrade the ammonium ferric complex of EDTA was isolated (18) but was unable to degrade nickel, cobalt, or copper EDTA complexes or ferric complexes of NTA, IDA, or ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetic acid (EDDA) (18, 30), despite their role as possible intermediates of EDTA degradation (4). EDTA biodegradation by a mixed culture and one of its component organisms isolated from sewage sludge was studied by Nortemann et al. (27, 28), using ferric ammonium EDTA as the sole nitrogen source initially and as the sole carbon source in later studies. A preliminary report suggested the possible growth of a mixed culture at the expense of heavy metal-EDTA complexes, but the loss of EDTA from the medium was not confirmed (21).
To date, the biodegradation of heavy metal complexes of EDTA, other than Fe, has not been demonstrated. The present study investigated the biodegradation of these complexes by an enriched microbial population and suggested the possible use of such populations in the remediation of wastes containing these complexes.
Culture isolation and culture conditions.
Samples were taken from the River Mersey (United Kingdom) and from liquid effluent sludge from an industrial effluent treatment plant. The river water (8 ml) and sludge (2 ml) were inoculated into 90 ml of filter-sterilized minimal medium (MM) with the following components (grams per liter): CaCl2, 0.025; MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.2; NaCl, 0.1; (NH4)2SO4, 0.5; disodium EDTA, 0.015; ZnSO4 · 7H2O, 0.0066; MnCl2 · 4H2O, 0.00171; FeSO4 · 7H2O, 0.0015; CoCl2 · 6H2O, 0.000483; CuSO4 · 5H2O, 0.000471; NaMoO4 · 2H2O, 0.000453; 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid, 5.225; and KH2PO4, 0.272. The pH was adjusted to 7 with 1 M NaOH, and 7.34 g of FeNaEDTA (Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom) liter−1 (20 mM) was added as the sole utilizable carbon source. The cultures were shaken (160 rpm, 30°C) for a month and then subcultured (10-ml inocula) into 90 ml of fresh MM with 1.83 g of FeNaEDTA liter−1 (5 mM); this was repeated monthly for 2 years.
To test for growth on heavy metal-EDTA complexes, samples (10 ml) taken from cultures pregrown with FeNaEDTA as the sole carbon source (30 days) were harvested by centrifugation (7,000 rpm, MSE high-speed 18 centrifuge, room temperature), washed twice in sterile isotonic saline (8.5 g of NaCl liter−1), and inoculated into 100 ml of MM containing 5 mM KH2PO4 and supplemented (to 5 mM) with CuNa2EDTA (1.88 g liter−1), CdNa2EDTA (2.22 g liter−1), CoNa2EDTA (1.96 g liter−1), NiNa2EDTA (1.96 g liter−1) (all from TCI, Tokyo, Japan), FeNaEDTA (1.83 g liter−1), or disodium EDTA (1.86 g liter−1; Sigma) as the sole carbon source. The EDTA compounds were of the highest grade commercially available (the NaEDTA was 99% pure; the others were at least 96% pure, with sulfate as the major contaminant, according to the manufacturer’s specifications), and the purity of each was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography (see below). Controls were samples without biomass (for each EDTA complex) and non-EDTA-supplemented cultures. Cultures were incubated as described above, with samples (1 ml) taken periodically and stored at −20°C for later analyses.
Growth on various substrates.
Samples (10 ml) were taken from cultures previously grown on FeEDTA (30 days), harvested, and washed as before and inoculated into MM (100 ml) supplemented with (5 mM) EDDA, ethylenediamine, trisodium acetate, trisodium NTA, IDA, or glycine, with growth tested as described above. Controls were uninoculated media and non-substrate-supplemented cultures.
Isolation and identification of microorganisms.
A 10−3 serial dilution was made in sterile isotonic saline from a month-old FeNaEDTA culture. A sample (10 μl) was spread plated onto MM plates containing 2 mM sodium acetate (BDH, Poole, United Kingdom) or 2 mM FeNaEDTA (30°C). Isolates were Gram stained by the Huckner method (9) with the Sigma Gram stain kit. Gram-negative rods were identified with the API 20E and 20NE kits (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Isolates were also identified by the Microbial Identification System (MIDI-MIS, Newark, Del.) as described previously (33). Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles were matched with those in the MIDI-MIS Trypticase soy broth agar aerobic database (version 3.2).
Biomass immobilization.
Cultures (50 ml) previously grown on 1.83 g of FeEDTA liter−1 (30 days), harvested, and washed as described above were inoculated into 2.5 liters of MM containing 1.5 g of ethylenediamine liter−1 and 3.4 g of trisodium acetate liter−1 (both 25 mM) in an airlift reactor constructed in the laboratory. Shale particles (60 g; average particle size, 3 by 3 mm; Thames Water) were washed with distilled water, sterilized (10% Chloros, 2 days), and washed several times with sterile distilled water. The particles were divided into two 30-g portions and placed into the lumens of two identical glass columns (each with a 90-ml capacity; 14.5 by 2.8 cm). The culture was cycled (Watson Marlow flow inducer) though both columns simultaneously at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 for 5 days. Random particles from each column were removed for protein analysis. After preparation, the columns were stored at 4°C until analyzed. For EDTA degradation experiments, 150 ml of MM containing 1 mM FeEDTA (0.367 g liter−1) and 1 mM KH2PO4 was pumped through each column at a flow rate of 0.25 ml min−1 (single pass). Column outflow samples, withdrawn hourly, were stored at −20°C for later analysis, together with samples of the input solution.
Analyses of biomass, residual EDTA, and metals.
Frozen samples (1 ml) were thawed, the biomass was removed by centrifugation (13,000 rpm in a Heraeus Sepatech Biofuge A at room temperature), and supernatant samples were removed, filtered (0.45-μm pore size), and diluted into fresh vacuum-filtered and degassed MM. EDTA analysis was based on a previously described method (5) using high-performance liquid chromatography with a 410 series UV detector (the pumps, injector, and detector were all from Waters, Milford, Mass.) and a Nucleosil 5-μm C18 column, 250 by 4.6 mm (Phenomenex, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom). The mobile phase was 0.03 M sodium acetate/acetic acid buffer (pH 4)/20 mM tetrabutyl ammonium hydroxide and 100 ml of methanol liter−1, filtered and degassed as described above. EDTA was detected at wavelengths of 254 and 300 nm. Metals were assayed by atomic-absorption spectroscopy (Pye Unicam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), with an acetylene (9-lb/in2) and air (30-lb/in2) flame. Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, and Co were detected at wavelengths of 228.8, 324.8, 213.9, 232.0, and 240.7 nm, respectively, against a blank of fresh MM.
For protein analysis, cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mM NaEDTA (1 ml), mixed for 10 min to remove bound metals, recentrifuged, and resuspended in MilliQ water. Protein was measured by the copper sulfate-bicinchoninic acid method (reagents were all from Sigma). For protein analysis of biomass-loaded shale, specimen shale particles were placed in a 1.5-ml tube containing MM with 50 mM NaEDTA (500 μl) and mixed vigorously for 10 min. This was repeated until no protein was detected in the wash solution. The dislodged cells were harvested and the protein concentration was estimated as described above.
Treatment of results.
All experiments were done in triplicate on three separate occasions, and the data were pooled and calculated as means ± standard deviations (SD) for three replicates. In general the SD was within ±10% of the mean and is only shown where this value was exceeded. Means ± SD for individual values are given below as appropriate.
Microorganism isolation and identification.
Fourteen morphologically distinct colony types were isolated from the mixed culture after 18 subcultures. Four were gram-negative bacteria and were identified by the API 20E and 20NE systems as strains of Enterobacter and Pseudomonas, respectively. These, and the 10 gram-positive bacteria, were identified further on the basis of cellular FAME profiles. Of the culturable organisms within the culture, gram-positive bacteria predominated, comprising species of Methylobacterium (35%), Variovorax (17%), Bacillus (10%), and Aureobacterium (10%) (Table (Table1).1). Variovorax (Alcaligenes) paradoxus was shown previously to tolerate EDTA (15) or, possibly more correctly, the Fe starvation that could be imposed by extensive tight chelation of Fe. This organism can degrade a variety of xenobiotics and also hydroxybutyrate, an ability it shares with Aureobacterium saperdae (2, 26, 32, 37, 38), which was also found in the present culture (Table (Table1).1). The microorganisms identified in Table Table11 represent only those that were culturable on plates. It is likely that a number of other microorganisms contributing to EDTA biodegradation but probably unculturable in isolation were also present. The total number of microorganisms found per milliliter was 10- to 100-fold less than expected on the basis of viable counts and compared with the determined amount of protein per milliliter. Therefore, it can be assumed that >90% of the microorganisms are not culturable in isolation by the method used here. This is supported by a published report which suggests that <1% of all microorganisms are culturable (1). Further studies using molecular probe methods are warranted.
Composition of the EDTA-degrading mixed culture
Biodegradation of metal-EDTA complexes and likely metabolic intermediates.
Incubation of the culture with the metal-EDTA complexes resulted in growth, biodegradation of each complex, and removal of metal over 28 days (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Equimolar inorganic phosphate was incorporated to scavenge released metal by precipitation, avoiding metal toxicity and illustrating the potential for remediation of metal-EDTA wastes. Growth on Fe- and NaEDTA gave doubling times of 66 and 288 h, respectively, with corresponding levels of EDTA degradation of 3.01 ± 0.19 mM (60%) and 1.57 ± 0.26 mM (31%) after 28 days (Fig. (Fig.1B1B and A). Biodegradation of the FeEDTA complex also resulted in the removal of 44% ± 0.03% of Fe from solution, probably as the hydroxide or phosphate. The apparently poor growth with and low biodegradability of NaEDTA in comparison to FeEDTA are probably due to the replacement of the Na ligand with essential trace metals from the medium, effectively starving the cells of these metals. Growth at the expense of the recalcitrant heavy metal complexes, Cd-, Cu-, Co-, and NiEDTA, was observed. The respective extents of EDTA biodegradation for these were 0.95 ± 0.13 mM (19.3%), 1.54 ± 0.23 mM (30%), 1.3 ± 0.23 mM (25%), and 1.16 ± 0.24 mM (23.4%) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The corresponding extents of metal removal were 19% ± 0.02% (Cd), 16% ± 0.01% (Cu), 14% ± 0.01% (Co), and 31% ± 0.00% (Ni) (Fig. (Fig.1C1C to F). Metal removal was stoichiometric or greater in the cases of Cd and Ni but only approximately 50% of that released from EDTA with Cu and Co. Insufficient metal was precipitated to permit X-ray powder diffraction analysis of the recovered precipitate.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Growth ([filled lozenge]) of the mixed culture on MM supplemented with 5 mM inorganic phosphate and NaEDTA (A), Fe(III)EDTA (B), CdEDTA (C), CuEDTA (D), CoEDTA (E), and NiEDTA (F) complexes; EDTA consumption (•); and metal removal ([filled triangle]). All SD (more ...)
From the above data the biodegradability of the heavy metal-EDTA complexes was ranked as follows: Fe>Cu>Co>Ni>Cd. From previous studies it could be predicted that FeEDTA would be the most readily biodegraded (4, 18). Previous work (18) also demonstrated biodegradation of Fe(III)EDTA by an Agrobacterium sp. at a rate of approximately 275 μmol h−1 μg of protein−1, which was nearly 20-fold higher than that obtained with the present mixed culture (15 μmol h−1 μg of protein−1). With a mixed culture, not all of the component organisms will degrade EDTA per se and may instead scavenge low-molecular-weight products, contributing to the total biomass protein and lowering the specific activity against the parent compound. The above-mentioned Agrobacterium sp. was of limited potential, being unable to biodegrade EDTA at concentrations below 5 mM or to utilize other metal-EDTA complexes. However, in addition to being versatile, the present culture gave a residual EDTA concentration of 2 to 2.5 mM (FeEDTA), with continuing activity at termination of the experiment at 30 days. Degradation of the other heavy metal-EDTA complexes appeared to cease at 3 to 4 mM EDTA (Fig. (Fig.1).1). This could be due to a specific threshold (e.g., as for the Agrobacterium sp.) below which the complexes of metals other than Fe are unable to be transported into the cells; the biphasic nature of the removal of FeEDTA (Fig. (Fig.1B)1B) could suggest the presence of two uptake processes, one nonspecific, low-affinity system and one Fe-specific, higher-affinity, system. The apparent Km values for the various complexes have never been studied and would repay further investigation, as they may ultimately limit the usefulness of an industrial process. However, such Km data would be difficult to interpret by using a mixed culture because individually, the isolates grew poorly at the expense of EDTA.
Other metal complexes (Mg-, Mn-, and CaEDTA) have been biodegraded completely by both a mixed microbial population and a single isolate. However, these metals are of relatively low toxicity and are essential micronutrients (27). A study of CoEDTA biodegradation using an Fe(III)EDTA-biodegrading Agrobacterium sp. was successful, but only because of displacement of the Co by Fe(III) (30). Biodegradation of the Co, Cu, Ni, and Cd complexes of EDTA has not been reported previously. Other workers have suggested the role of a specific Fe binding siderophore in the biodegradation of Fe(III)EDTA (18), and indeed, EDTA degradation did not cease as with the other metals but continued at a lower rate after 5 days (Fig. (Fig.1).1). It has been suggested that microorganisms isolated from an EDTA-rich environment have developed a specific Fe transport mechanism which is dependent on the binding of EDTA (18).
Previous studies have paid little attention to the likely breakdown intermediates of EDTA as potential “bottlenecks” which may limit the potential for its complete mineralization. The culture in the present study grew on substrates (EDDA, ethylenediamine, trisodium acetate, NTA, IDA, and glycine) previously proposed as degradation intermediates (4). Growth was more rapid than on FeEDTA for all substrates except EDDA, which, after a lag, gave a growth rate equal to that on EDTA (Fig. (Fig.2).2). Buildup of these intermediates was therefore unlikely to inhibit complete EDTA mineralization.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Growth of the culture on acetate (○), ethylenediamine ([filled triangle]), IDA ([open triangle]), glycine ([down-pointing small open triangle]), NTA (•), EDDA (◊), and FeEDTA ([filled triangle]). [filled square], control (non-substrate-supplemented culture). All SD are within 10%. (more ...)
EDTA biodegradation by immobilized cells.
The potential for developing a continuous-flow method of treating wastes bearing metal-EDTA complexes was assessed by using biomass samples of the mixed culture immobilized as a biofilm on shale particles. At a residence time of only 2.5 h (the fluid volume was 37 ml; the flow rate was 0.25 ml min−1), the immobilized cells degraded 20% ± 0.02% of the supplied FeEDTA and 13% ± 0.03% of the Fe was removed (150 ml of 1 mM FeEDTA over 10 h). In contrast, the time required for 20% removal of FeEDTA in the batch system was 4.5 days (Fig. (Fig.1).1). The input concentration of EDTA here was 1 mM, below the concentration which could be degraded by Agrobacterium in previous studies (see above).
The generation of a natural biofilm on shale particles may not be the most suitable method for the continuous treatment of metal-EDTA wastes. As an alternative, immobilization onto microcarriers as described previously (34) could be a superior method, and this should be investigated in future studies.
In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time the feasibility of biodegradation of several heavy metal-EDTA chelates and also identify some unusual microorganisms implicated in this process. Significant removal of EDTA in a continuous-flow system by immobilized biofilm justifies development of process engineering aspects of the system and further elucidation of the microbiological composition and biochemical processes within the culture.
We thank Thames Water for the gift of the shale particles and G. Basnak for help with the analysis of metals by atomic-absorption spectroscopy.
The support of the BBSRC (studentship no. 93302170 to R.A.P.T.) is acknowledged, with thanks. K.L. was supported by a grant from the European Union (EU Bio2 CT-943001).
1. Amann R I, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:143–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Avella M, Callandrelli L, Immirzi B, Malinconico M, Martuscelli E, Pascucci B, Sadocco P. Novel synthesis blends between bacterial polyesters and acrylic rubber—a study on enzymatic biodegradation. J Environ Polym Degrad. 1995;3:49–60.
3. Ayers J A. Decontamination of nuclear reactors and equipment. New York, N.Y: The Ronald Press Company; 1970.
4. Belly R T, Lauff J J, Goodhue C T. Degradation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid by microbial populations from an aerated lagoon. Appl Microbiol. 1975;29:787–794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Bergers P J M, De Groot A C. The analysis of EDTA in drinking water by HPLC. Water Res. 1994;28:639–642.
6. Bolton H, Jr, Li S W, Workman D J, Girvin D C. Biodegradation of synthetic chelates in subsurface sediments from the southeast coastal plain. J Environ Qual. 1993;22:125–132.
7. Choppin G R. Interactions of actinides with humic acid. Trans Am Nucl Soc. 1979;32:166–170.
8. Cleveland J M, Rees T F. Characterization of plutonium in Maxey Flats radioactive trench leachates. Science. 1981;212:1506–1509. [PubMed]
9. Collins C H, Patricia M L. Microbial methods. London, England: Butterworth & Co.; 1984. pp. 93–106.
10. Dietz F. Neue Messergebnisse uber die Belastung von Trinkwasser mit EDTA. Wasser-Abwasser-GWF. 1987;128:286–288.
11. Egli T. (An)aerobic breakdown of chelating agents used in household detergents. Microbiol Sci. 1988;5:36–41. [PubMed]
12. Egli T, Weilenman H U, El-Banna T, Auling G. Gram negative, aerobic nitrilotriacetate-utilising bacteria from wastewater and soil. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1988;10:297–305.
13. Francis A J. Microbial transformation of low level radioactive waste, environmental migration of long-lived radionuclides. IAEA-SM-257/72. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1982.
14. Gardiner J. Complexation of trace metals by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in natural waters. Water Res. 1976;10:507–514.
15. Gross M J, Logan B E. Influence of different chemical treatments on transport of Alcaligenes paradoxus in porous media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1750–1756. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hill-Cottingham D G. Photosensitivity of iron chelates. Nature (London) 1955;175:347–348.
17. Lambert J L, Godsey C E, Seitz L M. Preparation and photodecomposition of the complex acid, hydrogen aquo ethylenediamine tetraacetoferrate(III) Inorg Chem. 1963;2:127–129.
18. Lauff J J, Steele D B, Coogan L A, Breitfeller J M. Degradation of the ferric chelate of EDTA by a pure culture of an Agrobacterium sp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:3346–3353. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Lockhart H B, Jr, Blakey R V. Aerobic photodegradation of Fe(III)-(ethylenedinitrilo)tetraacetate (ferric EDTA)—implications for natural waters. Environ Sci Technol. 1975;9:1035–1038.
20. Macaskie L E. The application of biotechnology to the treatment of wastes produced from the nuclear fuel cycle: biodegradation and bioaccumulation as a means of treating radionuclide-containing streams. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1991;11:41–112. [PubMed]
21. Macaskie L E, Lloyd J R, Thomas R A P, Tolley M R. The use of microorganisms for the remediation of solutions contaminated with actinide elements, other radionuclides, and organic contaminants generated by nuclear fuel cycle activities. Nucl Energy. 1996;35:257–271.
22. Martel A E, Smith R M. Critical stability constants. 3. Other organic ligands. New York, N.Y: Plenum Publishing Corp.; 1977.
23. Mcfadden K M. Organic components of nuclear wastes and their potential for altering radionuclide distribution when released to soil. PNL-2563. Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service; 1980.
24. Means J L, Alexander C A. The environmental biogeochemistry of chelating agents and recommendations for the disposal of chelated radioactive wastes. Nucl Chem Waste Manag. 1981;2:183–196.
25. Means J L, Crerar D A, Duguid J O. Migration of radioactive wastes: radionuclide mobilisation by complexing agents. Science. 1978;200:1477–1480. [PubMed]
26. Mohan K, Khanna S. Degradation of veratraldehyde by Alcaligenes paradoxus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;108:361–366.
27. Nörtemann B, Imberg B, Hempel D C. Biodegradation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) In: Verachtert H, Verstraete W, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Environmental Biotechnology, Ostend, Belgium. Antwerp, Belgium: Koninklijke Vlaamse Ingenieursverenigung; 1991. pp. 259–262.
28. Nörtemann B. Total degradation of EDTA by mixed cultures and a bacterial isolate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:671–676. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Overcamp T J. Low-level radioactive waste disposal by shallow land burial. In: Klement A W, Brodsky A, editors. Handbook of environmental radiation. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1991. pp. 207–269.
30. Palumbo A V, Lee S Y, Boerman P. Effect of media composition of EDTA degradation by Agrobacterium sp. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1994;45:811–822. [PubMed]
31. Piciulo P L, Adams J W, Davis M S, Milian L W, Anderson C I. Release of organic chelating agents from solidified decontamination wastes. Document numbers NUREG/CR-4709 and BNL-NUREG-52014. Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service; 1986.
32. Selifonov S A, Slepenkin A V, Adanin V M, Grechkina G M, Starvoitov I I. Acenaphthene catabolisms by strains of Alcaligenes eutrophus and Alcaligenes paradoxus. Microbiology. 1993;62:85–92.
33. Stead D E, Dellwood J E, Wilson J, Viney I. Evaluation of a commercial identification system based on fatty-acid profiles for rapid, accurate identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1992;72:315–321.
34. Thomas, R. A. P., and L. E. Macaskie. The effect of growth conditions on the biodegradation of tributyl phosphate and potential for the remediation of acid mine drainage waters by a naturally occurring mixed microbial culture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., in press. [PubMed]
35. Tiedje J M. Microbial degradation of ethylenediaminetetraacetate in soils and sediments. Appl Microbiol. 1975;30:327–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Van Dijk-Looijaard A M, De Groot A C, Janssen P J C M, Wondergem E A. EDTA in drink-en oppervlakterwater. RIVM report no. 718629006. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: Rijksinstitut voor Volksgesondheid en Miliue; 1990.
37. Van Dijk-Looijaard A M, De Groot A C, Janssen P J C M, Wondergem E A. EDTA in drink-en oppervlakterwater. H2O. 1990;33:682–687.
38. Verhagen C, Smit E, Janssen D B, Vanelsas J D. Bacterial dichloropropene degradation in soil—screening of soils and involvement of plasmids carrying the DHLA gene. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27:1547–1557.
Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)