In order to investigate the coordinated expression of
murA and
rrnA of both
M. tuberculosis and
M. smegmatis and
tyrS and
rrnB of
M. smegmatis, RNase protection assays were carried out. The constructs used to generate two sets of appropriate radioactive probes are illustrated in Fig. . One set was designed to detect the 3′ end of
M. tuberculosis murA RNA (Fig. A) and the 3′ ends of
murA RNA and
tyrS RNA of
M. smegmatis (Fig. A).

The second set was designed to examine the expression of
murA and
tyrS and to relate the abundance of their transcripts to the abundance of pre-rRNA.
The data shown in Fig. B (for M. tuberculosis murA) and 3C (for M. smegmatis murA and tyrS) provide evidence for large transcriptional units which extend through the protein coding region and into the 16S rRNA coding region. These transcripts comprise two regions, one coding for protein (MurA or TyrS) and the other coding for rRNA. For this reason, these RNA species are considered to be hybrid transcripts derived from hybrid operons. The hybrid operon identified in M. tuberculosis (Fig. ) comprises murA at the 5′ end with the rrnA operon located downstream. The hybrid operons identified in M. smegmatis (Fig. ) comprise murA at the 5′ end with the rrnA operon located downstream and tyrS at the 5′ end with the rrnB operon located downstream.
Previously (
10), we described two categories of promoters that are present in
M. tuberculosis in particular and in mycobacterial
rrn operons in general (Fig. ) and that are dedicated to pre-rRNA synthesis. One category (P1) is located within the coding region of
murA, near the 3′ end; the second category (PCL1) is located within the hypervariable multiple-promoter region which extends from the 3′ end of
murA to a conserved sequence motif, CL2, which lies upstream from the 16S rRNA gene and within the leader region of pre-rRNA transcripts (
10). PCL1 promoters are associated with another conserved sequence motif, (CL1) (
10,
11). A third category of promoter (P
murA), which lies upstream from
murA, has now been identified. Previously, we identified a single (P1) promoter of the
rrnB operon of
M. smegmatis, located between
tyrS and the 16S rRNA gene (
8,
9). We have now identified a second promoter upstream from
tyrS; this promoter is responsible for transcription of the hybrid operon.
M. tuberculosis has a single copy of
murA per genome (
4). Restriction enzyme digests of
M. smegmatis genomic DNA revealed
murA and
tyrS to be present in single copies per genome (results not shown). Thus,
murA, which forms part of a hybrid operon with
rrnA, is the sole source of MurA in both
M. tuberculosis and
M. smegmatis. Similarly,
tyrS, which forms part of a hybrid operon with
rrnB in
M. smegmatis, is the sole source of TyrS in
M. smegmatis. We therefore carried out RNase protection studies using the probes described in Fig. A, A, and B in order to study
murA RNA and
tyrS RNA synthesis under different conditions of mycobacterial growth and to relate their synthesis to pre-rRNA synthesis.
The RNA fraction comprises mainly (approximately 83%) rRNA (
2) and much lower levels of mRNA. The abundance of a particular mRNA within the RNA fraction represents a steady-state value which reflects both the rate of synthesis and the rate of degradation or processing. Comparative values of radioactivity per assay provide a measure of the relative number of transcripts at the steady state. The abundance of
murA RNA within the RNA fraction was related to the abundance of transcripts of
rrnA originating from tsp one (tsp1) and designated pre-rRNA
A(P1) as shown in Fig. and Table for
M. tuberculosis and in Fig. A, B, and A for
M. smegmatis.
| TABLE 2Correlation of the abundance of murA transcripts of M. tuberculosis measured by RNase protection assays with the abundance of pre-rRNAA(P1) transcripts |
The results for
M. tuberculosis (Fig. B and Table ) show that
murA was expressed at all stages of growth, that is, not only during balanced growth but also during the stationary phase. For each assay, the number of
murA transcripts was related first to the number of pre-rRNA
A(P1) transcripts. The results obtained for samples r, s, t, and u (Table ) show that there were 50 to 360 copies of
murA RNA per 1,000 copies of pre-rRNA
A(P1). Previously, we showed (
9) that pre-rRNA
A(P1) comprises approximately 20% of pre-rRNA. These estimates suggest that, on average, there were 10 to 70 copies of
murA RNA for every 1,000 copies of pre-rRNA. The low level of pre-rRNA in the late log phase (sample v), originating from the P1 and PCL1 promoters and reported earlier (
9), accounts for the observed high ratio of
murA RNA to pre-rRNA
A(P1) shown in Table .
The data obtained for M. smegmatis (Fig. C) show that murA was expressed during the stationary phase as well as during balanced growth. A comparison of the radioactivities of murA RNA- and pre-rRNAA(P1)-protected fragments revealed that more copies of murA RNA per copy of pre-rRNAA(P1) were found during exponential growth in Lemco broth than during the stationary phase (Fig. A, panel i) or when growth conditions were less favorable, as in Kohn-Harris glucose medium (Fig. A, panel ii).
Previously, it was shown that the contribution of pre-rRNA
A(P1) to all transcripts (pre-rRNA
A) of
rrnA depended on the growth rate; pre-rRNA
A(P1) accounted for approximately 1% of pre-rRNA
A during early growth (e.g., Table , samples a and b) in Lemco broth; this value rose to approximately 15% during the stationary phase (e.g., Table , samples e, f, and g) or in Kohn-Harris glucose medium (
9). During early growth in Lemco broth, the numbers of
murA transcripts were found to exceed the numbers of transcripts of pre-rRNA
A(P1) (Fig. A, panel i). On the basis of the above-mentioned data, we estimate that, during culturing in Lemco broth, for every 1,000 copies of pre-rRNA
A, we detected approximately 15 copies of
murA RNA during the early stages of growth and 60 to 100 copies during the stationary phase. However, the overall pattern of
murA RNA synthesis does not reflect the pattern of pre-rRNA
A synthesis. The burst of pre-rRNA
A synthesis [approximately 100-fold that of pre-rRNA
A(P1)] that is known to take place during early growth in Lemco broth (
9) has no counterpart in
murA RNA synthesis. We infer that although the stimuli for
murA and
rrnA transcription may have features in common, they are not identical.
| TABLE 3RNA fractions isolated from mycobacteria at representative stages of growth |
The results show that tyrS RNA was detected at all stages of growth of M. smegmatis (Fig. D). When the mycobacterium was grown in Lemco broth, tyrS RNA was found to be most abundant during the early stages of growth and least abundant during the early and late stationary phases. When growth took place in Kohn-Harris glucose medium, the abundance of tyrS RNA was scarcely higher than the value found during the stationary phase in Lemco broth. In general, the profiles of tyrS RNA synthesis were found to correlate with the profiles of transcripts (pre-rRNAB) of rrnB (Fig. D); for example, the burst in the synthesis of tyrS RNA noted during early growth in Lemco broth was also seen for the synthesis of pre-rRNAB. The abundance of tyrS RNA transcripts was related to the abundance of transcripts of pre-rRNAB (Fig. B); ratios within the range of 1 to 6 copies of tyrS RNA for every 1,000 copies of pre-rRNAB were obtained. The highest ratio of tyrS RNA to pre-rRNAB, which was found during early growth in Lemco broth, is thought to reflect the need of the cells for a higher ratio of TyrS per ribosome during a period of rapid protein biosynthesis.