PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 December; 48(12): 1014–1022.
PMCID: PMC1003941

Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging in the evaluation of acute neuropsychiatric disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are useful for the evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) lupus. This report describes the use of cranial MR and CT in 21 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with acute neuropsychiatric symptoms manifested by headache, seizures, focal neurological deficits, psychosis, or organic brain syndrome. Computed tomography was found to be insensitive and detected only diffuse atrophy (two cases), cerebral infarct (one case), and intracerebral haemorrhage (one case) in the 21 patients. Cranial MR images obtained with a General Electric 1.5 tesla Signa unit detected labile and fixed areas of increased proton intensity interpreted as focal oedema (eight cases), infarct (10 cases), haemorrhage (one), atrophy (seven), and acute sinusitis (two). Focal oedema was characterised by labile, high intensity lesions in the gray or white matter of the cerebellum, cerebrum, or brain stem, which completely resolved after aggressive corticosteroid treatment. Most high intensity reversible or fixed lesions evident on MR were not apparent on cranial CT images. In several patients sequential MR images were valuable in monitoring the efforts of treatment. Although histological confirmation of the high intensity brain lesions apparent on MR is desirable, prior necropsy studies suggest that pathological confirmation may be difficult owing to the paucity of recognisable brain lesions in patients with CNS lupus. It is concluded that for the evaluation of acute neuropsychiatric SLE MR is useful and provides more information than cranial CT.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page.

Images in this article


Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group