Home | About | Journals | Submit Manuscript | Contact Us 
pmc logo imagepmc logo image
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Am J Prev Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 June 17.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2697448
NIHMSID: NIHMS47224
Web-Based Smoking-Cessation Program
Results of a Randomized Trial
Victor J. Strecher, PhD, Jennifer B. McClure, PhD, Gwen L. Alexander, PhD, Bibhas Chakraborty, MStat, MA, Vijay N. Nair, PhD, Janine M. Konkel, MPH, Sarah M. Greene, MPH, Linda M. Collins, PhD, Carola C. Carlier, MA, MSW, Cheryl J. Wiese, Roderick J. Little, PhD, Cynthia S. Pomerleau, PhD, and Ovide F. Pomerleau, PhD
From the University of Michigan (Strecher, Chakraborty, Nair, Konkel, Carlier, Little, Pomerleau, Pomerleau), Ann Arbor, Michigan; Group Health (McClure, Greene, Wiese), Seattle, Washington; from the Henry Ford Health System (Alexander), Detroit, Michigan; and Pennsylvania State University (Collins), University Park, Pennsylvania
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Victor J. Strecher, PhD, MPH, Professor and Director, Center for Health Communications Research, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 300 N. Ingalls, Room 5D-04 (0471), Ann Arbor MI 48109-0471. E-mail: strecher/at/umich.edu
Abstract
Background
Initial trials of web-based smoking-cessation programs have generally been promising. The active components of these programs, however, are not well understood. This study aimed to (1) identify active psychosocial and communication components of a web-based smoking-cessation intervention and (2) examine the impact of increasing the tailoring depth on smoking cessation.
Design
Randomized fractional factorial design.
Setting
Two HMOs: Group Health in Washington State and Henry Ford Health System in Michigan.
Participants
1866 smokers.
Intervention
A web-based smoking-cessation program plus nicotine patch. Five components of the intervention were randomized using a fractional factorial design: high- versus low-depth tailored success story, outcome expectation, and efficacy expectation messages; high- versus low-personalized source; and multiple versus single exposure to the intervention components.
Measurements
Primary outcome was 7 day point-prevalence abstinence at the 6-month follow-up.
Findings
Abstinence was most influenced by high-depth tailored success stories and a high-personalized message source. The cumulative assignment of the three tailoring depth factors also resulted in increasing the rates of 6-month cessation, demonstrating an effect of tailoring depth.
Conclusions
The study identified relevant components of smoking-cessation interventions that should be generalizable to other cessation interventions. The study also demonstrated the importance of higher-depth tailoring in smoking-cessation programs. Finally, the use of a novel fractional factorial design allowed efficient examination of the study aims. The rapidly changing interfaces, software, and capabilities of eHealth are likely to require such dynamic experimental approaches to intervention discovery.