Home | About | Journals | Submit Manuscript | Contact Us 
pmc logo imagepmc logo image
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
From:
Am J Prev Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Am J Prev Med. 2007 October; 33(4): 336–345.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007
Table B1
Summary of physical activity intervention studies.
AuthorsSample
characteristics
MeasuresTheoretical
framework;
Behavior change
strategies
Study designIntervention
technology
Control
condition
Results
Bickmore (2005) 15N = 101
Ret = 81.2%
Mean age = 24.8
55% Female
Mean BMI = 24.4
Community based
PAR-Q;
# days/week over 30 min; # days/week over 10K steps
SLT, CBT
GS, SH, RF, SM, EDU, PS
QE
Randomized by individual; Posttest only for PA
Non-relational group received interactive computer agent, continuous access lasting 5-10 min each session.
Relational group received non-relational intervention + computer agent w/social, emotional communication style.
Web forms only. Never interacted w/computer agentNo significant differences between groups on # days exceeding time or step count criterion.
Marginally significant difference favoring combined intervention groups. Post test only comparisons.
Croteau (2004) 16N = 37
Ret = 100%
Ages 23-64; Mean age = 44.3
78.4% Female,
100% Caucasian
Worksite (college campus) based
Pedometer; Perceptions of Physical Activity Survey (PPA); Physical Activity Survey (PAS); Height/WeightNot stated
GS, SM personal action plan
One group experimental designOne counseling session followed by wkly emails reminders, motivational tips, and educational information over 8 wksNoneSignificant increase over time in # steps, PAS & PPA outcomes. Significant and large increases for both goal groups. Stratified by BMI, only significantly increases were w/obese group.
Dinger (2004) 17N = 43
Ret = 83.7%
Ages 25-54; Mean age = 41.7
100% Female,
88.9% Caucasian
PAR-Q; IPAQ longTTM
SM, EDU, BB, GS, PS, TL, SS, PR, RF, TS
One group experimental designWkly brief emails that contained information & strategies to change TTM constructs over 6 wksNoneSignificant increases in total walking mins, # mins walking at work, for leisure & for transportation
Goran (2005) 18N = 207
Ret = 58.9%
4th grade classes; Mean age = 9.4
60% Female
58% Hispanic
Mean BMI = 19.5
Height/weight; body fat; AccelerometerSCT
GS, ML, SM, RF, CE, SE
QE
Randomized by school
Interactive CD-ROM game, 8 lessons + 4 classroom lessons & 4 family based assignments. 45 min per lesson over 8 wks for 12 hrs total contactVariety of popular CD-ROMs not related to health topicsNo significant differences between groups on total PA, & unexpected significant decrease in moderate PA for treatment group.
Significant sex-by-treatment interaction for BMI & % body fat. Treatment girls had lower BMI & no change for boys.
Hager (2002) 19N = 525
Ret = 76.6%
Mean age = 42.0
56% Female
94%Caucasian
University based
7 Day PA Recall Questionnaire; Health Insurance Plan of New York Questionnaire; Stages of changeTTM
RF, CE, GS, Self liberation; helping relationships; consciousness raising; counter-conditioning; relapse prevention
RCTAction group received BL online message & 5 follow up emails over 6 wks tailored to action & maintenance stages only (e.g. one size fits all message).
Received BL online message & 5 follow up emails over 6 wks tailored to specific SOC.
5 wkly email messages over 6 wks encouraging proper nutrition. No tailored messages.No significant differences in PA or stage of change.
Within group, action group significantly increased total PA. Significant increases in Staged & Action groups for leisure PA & only action group increased occupational PA. All groups significant & positive increase in average SOC.
Hageman (2005) 20N = 31
Ret = 96.8%
Ages 50-69; Mean age = 56.1
100% Female
93.5% Caucasian
Modified 7-day Activity Recall, Rockport Fitness Walking Test; Height/weight; Body composition (BIA); Modified Sit & Reach TestPender's Health Promotion Model & SCT
TL, DB, SE, GS
RCT
Randomized by individual
3 internet tailored newsletters w/ 5-7 brief articles delivered at BL, 1 & 2 mo. Articles tailored on BL assessment3 internet non-tailored newsletters each w/ 5-7 brief articles delivered at BL, 1 & 2 mosNo significant group effects on activity. Both groups significantly increased sit & reach test. VO2 Max & % body fat significantly decreased for control group & no change in the tailored group.
Marshall (2003) 21N = 655
Ret = 78.2%
Mean age = 43.0
51% Female
Mean BMI = 24
University (Australian) based
IPAQ Short; Stage of ChangeTTM
TL, RF, GS, SM, PR, SS
RCT
Stratified by stage of change, Randomized by individual
Stage-tailored interactive Active Living web-site w/ animated features, stage-based quizzes & personalized sections. Continuous access + 4 personalized reinforcement emails over 8 wksStage-tailored printed Active Living booklets + 4 reinforcement letters over 8 wksFor whole sample, no significant differences in stage progress or total PA between or within groups. When analysis restricted to inactive group, significant increase in total PA favoring Print group, & a significant decrease in time sitting on a weekday favoring Web group.
McKay (2001) 22N = 78
Ret = 87.2%
Ages 40+; Mean age = 52.3
53% Female
82% Caucasian
US & Canada w/Type 2 diabetes
PAR-Q; BRFSS (select work & nonwork physical activity items)SEM
GL, FB, PS, SS
RCT
Randomized by individual
Continuous access over 8 wks to online tailored website w/ goal setting & planning modules, personal online coach & feedback w/in 48hr, peer-to-peer support area, graphing, & access to articles, tips, & motivational storiesContinuous access over 8 wks to website's library of diabetes specific articles + real-time blood glucose tracking w/graphic feedbackNo significant difference by group over time in moderate to vigorous PA or walking. Both groups significantly increased PA & walking over time.
Napolitano (2003) 23N = 65
Ret = 80.0%
Mean age = 42.8
86% Female
91% Caucasian
Mean BMI = 26.6
Worksite (Hospital) based
PAR-Q; PA Stages of Change; BRFSS Physical Activity ItemsSCT & SOC
TS, GS, SM, SS, RF, PS, TL, activity planning
RCT
Randomized by individual
Continuous access to website for 12 wks w/ weekly email tip sheets & helpline. Stage tailored informationWait list controlAt 1 mo, significant changes in moderate PA mins & walking mins favoring intervention group. At 3 mo compared to 1mo, only walking mins significantly greater for intervention group.
Palmer (2005) 24N = 233
Ret = 73.8%
5th graders
55.8% Females
School based
Weekly Activity Checklist (WAC)Not stated
FB, EDU, DB
QE
Non-randomized
Internet delivered instruction twice wkly for 50 min during school. Got tailored information, quizzes, writing activities with graphics & animation. Unknown duration.Wait list controlNo significant between group differences. Within group, both groups increased from BL to T3. Interaction also significant where first group increased from BL to T2 & T2 to T3. However, waiting list control significantly increased from BL to T2
Pinto (2002) 25N = 298
Ret = 81.5%
Mean age = 45.9
72% Female,
45% Caucasian
45% African American
Mean BMI = 28.7
Group Medical Practice based
Self reported BMI; 7-day PAR; Stage of Motivational Readiness for Physical ActivityTTM, SCT, decision making theory
GL, TL, PS, DB
RCT
Randomized by individual
Received Telephone Linked Communication (TLC) focused on PA change
Wkly calls for 10 min for 3 mos, then biweekly till 6 mo
Received TLC focused on healthy eating behaviorsIntention to treat found significant between group differences in % meeting recommendations of combined moderate & vigorous PA at 3 mo only. No significant 6 mo effects.
Rovniak (2005) 26N = 61
Ret = 82.0%
Mean age = 40.2
100% Female
82% Caucasian
Mean BMI = 26.9
Height/weight; 1 Mile Walk Test; National Health Interview Survey (PA questions)SCT
ML, GS, SM, FB
RCT
Stratified by age & walk test time, Randomized by individual
Email, goals, & contact components standardized for both groups. Intervention group received brief modeling demo, more specific goals & feedback relative to norm & past performance over 12 wks. Provided stopwatch & walking routes.Weekly email log, general email prompts, & tips targeting social support, environmental cues, injury prevention w/feedback over 12 wksSignificant between group increases in walk test time & heart rate favoring high fidelity group at posttest & marginally significant increases VO2 max. At 1 year marginally significant differences in mins walked favoring high fidelity group.
Yoo (2003) 27N = 30
Ret = 93.3%
Mean age = 56.1
64.3% Female
Hospital based (Korea) w/Type 2 diabetics
VO2 max; blood glucose; Stage of Exercise Behavior Scale (SEBC); Activity Assessment Questionnaire (AAQ); PA diaries; PedometersTTM
TL, FB, GS, SM, PS
One group experimental designWebsite included program manual, help materials, links to sites, general info, exercise test & prescription, stage-matched intervention & Q&A board. Contact lasted 50-105 min on first visit, 20-50 mins for pre-contemplation & contemplation stages, & 60 min for other stages. Unknown DurationNoneSignificant increases over time in PA measured by accelerometer, & level of PA. Significant increases in VO2 max, blood glucose, pc 2hr glucose, & HbA1c.
Note: Theoretical Models: CBT = Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; MI = Motivational Interviewing; SCT = Social Cognitive Theory; SEM = Social Ecological model; TRA = Theory of Reasoned Action; TTM = Transtheoretical Model; Behavior Change Strategies: CE = Changing the environment; DB = Decisional Balance (benefits and barriers); EDU = Education and/or knowledge; FB = Feedback; GS = Goal Setting; ML = Modeling; PC = Pros and cons; PR = Prompts/Cues; PS = Problem Solving (PS); SE = Self-efficacy; SH = Shaping; SM = Self-monitoring; SS = Social Support; RF = Reinforcement, rewards; TL = Tailoring; TS = Tip Sheets; Design: RCT = Randomized Controlled Trial; QE = Quasi-experimental