Combined Lateral and Transcuneiform without Medial Osteotomy for Residual Clubfoot for Children]]>Logo of corrspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice ]]>
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May; 467(5): 1319–1325.
Published online 2009 February 27. doi:  10.1007/s11999-009-0755-4
PMCID: PMC2664442

Combined Lateral and Transcuneiform without Medial Osteotomy for Residual Clubfoot for Children

Abstract

Residual deformity in resistant clubfoot is not uncommon. The “bean-shaped foot” exhibits forefoot adduction and midfoot supination and may interfere with function due to poor foot placement. For children less than 5 years of age we describe a corrective procedure combining a closing wedge cuboidal osteotomy and trans-midfoot rotation procedure without a medial opening wedge osteotomy. We retrospectively reviewed twelve patients (14 feet), mean age 4.7 years (range, 4–5 years), who had undergone the procedure to correct forefoot adduction and midfoot supination deformities. We obtained minimal access via a small lateral skin incision. Cuboid lateral wedge osteotomy was followed by transcuneiform osteotomy using a Kirschner wire as a guide under an image intensifier. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 2.6 years; range, 2–3.2 years). All patients had qualitative improvement in correction of adduction and supination deformities. Radiographically there was an improvement in adduction deformity, the mean anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal and calcaneo-fifth metatarsal angles improved by 28° (from 40° to 12°) and by 11° (from 21° to 10°). The supination improved by 11° (from 19° to 8°) and the cavus improved by 17° (from 30° to 13°). The short-term outcome was reliable and this combination is useful for children younger than 5 years old where the medial cuneiform ossification center remained poorly defined.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study (case series). See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction

Residual deformity in resistant clubfeet is not uncommon. The “bean-shaped foot” combines forefoot adduction and midfoot supination and may interfere with full plantigrade placement of the foot on the ground and proper shoe fitting, thus limiting gait and daily activities [10, 14]. Although Ponseti serial casting techniques, soft tissue releases, and tendon transfers have met with success in most cases [13], there remains a group of resistant clubfoot patients that require a bony procedure to correct the residual deformity.

Various osteotomies have been described to correct this deformity, including those at the levels of the transmetatarsal region, midfoot, and Lisfranc joint [3, 4, 6, 7, 18]. The combined procedure of shortening the lateral column and lengthening the medial column is the most logical approach to address the pathology of forefoot adduction. [2, 5, 10, 12, 14, 15, 17]. However, children younger than 5 years old generally do not have a well-developed medial cuneiform ossific nucleus resulting in a high risk of graft extrusion [5, 12]. Several authors have advocated transcuneiform osteotomy which would address the rotational/supination deformity of the midfoot [10, 15].

We describe a new surgical procedure for younger children less than 5 years old using a combination of a closing wedge cuboidal osteotomy and trans-midfoot osteotomy with rotation procedure without a medial opening wedge osteotomy. We present the short-term clinical (presence of adduction, supination and hindfoot varus) and radiographic findings (talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneo-fifth metatarsal angle, talo-first metatarsal angle, and calcaneo-first metatarsal angle).

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients (14 feet) with residual clubfoot, mean age 4.7 years (range, 4–5 years), who had undergone cuboid closing wedge osteotomy and trans-midfoot osteotomy for adduction and supination deformities from 2005 to 2006. There were seven boys and five girls in the study. Our indications for surgery were as follows: children with clubfoot who still had residual forefoot adduction and supination despite previous treatment (serial casting and soft tissue release), and had no previous osteotomy. Two patients had bilateral deformities and had surgery on both feet. Preoperatively, eight patients had mild hindfoot varus and three feet had calluses on the lateral plantar surface of the foot. Seven patients had previous serial casting and five had prior soft tissue release procedures. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 2.6 years; range, 2–3.2 years). No patients were lost to followup.

Assessment of patients was performed by two junior authors (IM, AM) preoperatively from the clinic. In addition, history was taken from the parents and this included: difficulty in footwear, pain associated with activities, foot deformity, presence of calluses on the lateral plantar surface of the foot, and abnormal gait by visual observation. Forefoot adduction, supination, and hindfoot varus in relation to resistant clubfoot were also clinically documented qualitatively by visual inspection. Hindfoot varus was tested using the Coleman block test for assessment of flexibility.

The patient was positioned supine on the surgical table. All patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia and a tourniquet was used. We prepared and draped the foot in a sterile fashion. A longitudinal lateral incision was made to expose the cuboid. We identified and reflected the extensor digitorum brevis. A closing dorsolaterally based wedge was performed on the cuboid measuring approximately 2 to 4 mm at the base and this was removed. A smooth k-wire was inserted under image intensifier from the cuboid to the estimated center of medial cuneiform to act as a guide for osteotomy. Hoffman retractors were used to protect the soft tissues above and below the bones. An osteotome was used to make a transverse osteotomy guided by the k-wire across from the cuboid to medial cuneiform without making a medial incision. We achieved correction of the foot supination by rotating the forefoot at the midfoot transverse osteotomy (Fig. 1A–B). The lateral cuboid wedge was closed and held with one or two wires. The medial column was not opened and no bone graft placed on the medial cuneiform. The closure of the lateral cuboid wedge was accompanied by the rotation of the forefoot, corrected adduction and supination. The wound was closed without drain. The wires were left outside the skin.

Fig. 1A B
(A) Line drawings show correction of the bean-shaped foot. (B) A three dimensional illustration of a left foot shows the laterally based closing wedge and the transverse osteotomies from the cuboid crossing to the medial cuneiform. The closure of the ...

An above-knee cast was applied and the wires were removed after 4 weeks. A below-knee cast was reapplied for another 2 weeks. Postoperatively we advised patients remain nonweightbearing with walking assists during the 6 weeks in the cast. Once the cast was removed at 6 weeks, physiotherapy was started for progressive weight bearing as tolerated. No walking assist was used but the physiotherapist taught the parents to aid the children in ambulating.

Postoperatively, patients were followed up at 1 week for cast inspection, at 4 weeks for removal of k-wires, at 6 weeks for removal of cast, and at 12 weeks for clinical and radiological assessments. The clinical outcome was measured qualitatively by visual assessments, comparing the preoperative and postoperative adduction, supination and hindfoot varus during followup. The followup routine occurred at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of the foot were taken pre- and postoperatively to assess the severity of the deformity and to document any radiographic improvement with surgery. On the AP radiograph, we (IM, AM) measured the calcaneo-fifth metatarsal angle and the talo-first metatarsal angle as indicators of forefoot adduction [15]. On the lateral radiograph, the talo-first metatarsal angle and the calcaneo-first metatarsal angles were measured to give an indication of supination and cavus deformity respectively [15].

Results

All patients had improvement of forefoot adduction and midfoot supination deformities (Fig. 2A–B). No hindfoot varus was noted postoperatively in all eight patients. Parents of 11 of 12 patients reported better appearance of the foot, less difficulty in footwear, and reduced foot pain. The lateral calluses disappeared in the three patients having them preoperatively. Qualitatively the gait improved due to plantigrade placement of the foot. We observed no recurrences of deformity at the last followup.

Fig. 2A B
(A) This picture shows the preoperative right foot appearance in a 4-year old boy with residual clubfoot. (B) This postoperative photo shows the same patient after the cuboid closing wedge osteotomy and transmidfoot osteotomy at 2 years followup. ...

At the last followup, radiographically, there was an improvement in adduction deformity (Fig. 3A–B), the mean anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal and calcaneo-fifth metatarsal angles improved by 28° (from 40° to 12°) and by 11° (from 21° to 10°). The supination improved by 11° (from 19° to 8°) and cavus improved by 17° (from 30° to 13°) (Tables 1, ,22).

Fig. 3A B
(A) The preoperative anteroposterior radiographic view of the patient’s left foot is shown. (B) The postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of the left foot is shown following this procedure which demonstrated correction of adduction on AP view. ...
Table 1
Radiographic angles measured in degrees
Table 2
Means and ranges of the radiographic parameters

Two patients had wound infection postoperatively, both of which resolved with removal of wires and oral antibiotics.

Discussion

Treatment of residual deformities in resistant clubfoot remains challenging. Many patients have undergone prior surgical procedures, leading to scarring of the skin and soft tissues. Complications such as skin necrosis, difficulty in manipulating the medial side due to scarring, cartilage, or physeal damage to the growing bone can occur following reoperations [10]. We describe how correction of forefoot adduction and midfoot supination can be achieved without medial osteotomy for children younger than 5 years when the cuneiform ossific nucleus is not well-developed and provide short-term clinical and radiographic findings.

The limitations observed in this study include the small number of patients and the short duration of followup with mean follow up of 2.6 years (range, 2–3.2 years). The long-term outcome of this procedure therefore remains unknown. Pohl and Nicol reported one case of recurrence at 2 years, attributed to the collapse of the medial graft [15], however, Schaefer and Hefti observed a tendency to adduction deformity with longer followup [17]. Another limitation arises from the qualitative clinical outcome measures based on parents’ perceptions and visual assessments. These qualitative assessments were, however, supplemented by the more objective radiographic measures.

The essential deformity in residual clubfoot is the length disproportion between medial and lateral columns of the foot [1]. Although the Ponseti serial casting technique has been effective in correcting even neglected clubfeet [13], surgical procedures may be needed to correct more rigid and structural deformities. We chose not to perform the medial opening wedge osteotomy since all of the children were younger than 5 years old with a less than well-developed medial cuneiform ossific nucleus. In addition, we believe that it would be difficult to locate the exact site for the medial osteotomy and would possibly disturb the medial column growth plate as well as increase the risk of medial graft extrusion in a cartilaginous area. Nonetheless, correction of adduction deformity in our series was comparable to others radiographically [5, 11, 15] (Table 3).

Table 3
Data comparison with other series

We believe the medial cuneiform opening wedge osteotomy should still be performed in older children once the ossific nucleus is well-defined, for a better correction of forefoot adduction deformities. Addressing the medial side for older children may have the benefit of handling the following issues: (1) the abductor hallucis longus, which can be a deforming force; (2) cavus component of the deformity is often present, thus the ability to perform a plantar fascia release from the medial side; (3) a Z-plasty can be performed at the medial scar if the previous scar is contributing to the deformity; (4) performing a medial cuneiform—1st metatarsal capsulotomy which may help correct the forefoot adduction deformity; (5) lengthening the medial column with an opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy may improve long-term results in the older child (> 4 years of age); and (6) as noted by Ponseti [16], the anterior tibial tendon can often be a supination deforming force, therefore, the anterotibial tendon transfer to the mid-foot (Garceau procedure) at the time of the double-tarsal osteotomy can be performed [16].

The minimal access was an added advantage to our procedure whereby only a small lateral incision was made for cuboidal wedge osteotomy. Using the same approach, the trans-midfoot osteotomy was subsequently performed under an image intensifier using a Kirschner wire and osteotome. This ensured minimal disruption to the soft tissue on the medial side of the foot.

Numerous types of osteotomies and their combinations have previously been described for correction of forefoot adduction and midfoot supination. Johanning in 1958 described wedge resection and enucleation of the cuboid to shorten the lateral column, followed by manipulation and casting as treatment of resistant clubfoot [9]. Lengthening of the short medial column had also been described by Hofmann et al. where medial wedge cuneiform osteotomy corrected the forefoot adduction but did not easily address the supination [8].

In 1991, McHale and Lenhart [14] first described the combination of a shortening osteotomy of cuboid and elongation of cuneiform. Supported by cadaveric study, they suggested the cuboid closing wedge corrected the midfoot, whereas the cuboid and cuneiform osteotomies both contributed to the correction in the forefoot [14]. Kose et al., using cadaveric and clinical studies, reported a combination of three procedures namely transmidtarsal, closing cuboidal, and opening cuneiform wedge osteotomy [10]. The added advantage of the trans-midfoot procedure was to allow correction of the rotational component as it was centered at the apex of the deformity. Therefore, these combinations allowed corrections of three planes to be made simultaneously. However, this method did not address the residual hindfoot varus. Pohl and Nicol adapted the technique by exiting the osteotome at the apex of cuboid osteotomy and reported similar results with a reliable correction of adduction and supination [15] (Table 3).

Lourenco et al. subsequently reported their series of treatment of residual adduction deformity in clubfoot by double osteotomy and advocated that surgery should be reserved for children older than 4 years of age when the medial cuneiform ossific nucleus is well-developed [12]. Using similar techniques, Gordon et al. [5] stated a success rate of 90% improvement in both clinical and radiographic evaluation. They, too, recommended that the procedure should be reserved for patients age 5 years or older.

We found the combined closing wedge cuboid and trans-midfoot rotation osteotomy had a low rate of complications and reasonably corrected residual forefoot adduction and midfoot supination. We believe this combination is useful for children younger than 5 years of age in whom a medial cuneiform ossification center is not well-developed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Loh Zhi Wen, Miss Beishan Tai Sarah and Mr Heng Hwee Yee Christian for secretarial assistance.

Footnotes

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patient licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution does not require approval for the human protocol for this investigation but that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

References

1. Berg EE. A reappraisal of metatarsus adductus and skewfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1185–1196. [PubMed]
2. Brink DS, Levitsky DR. Cuneiform and cuboid wedge osteotomies for correction of residual metatarsus adductus: a surgical review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1995;34:371–378. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(09)80007-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Dierauer S, Schafer D, Hefti F. Osteotomies of the mid- and back-foot in recurrent club foot. Orthopade. 1999;28:117–124. [PubMed]
4. El-Tayeby HM. The neglected clubfoot: a salvage procedure. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1998;37:501–509. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(98)80027-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Gordon JE, Luhmann SJ, Dobbs MB, Szymanski DA, Rich MM, Anderson DJ, Schoenecker PL. Combined midfoot osteotomy for severe forefoot adductus. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:74–78. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200301000-00015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Harley BD, Fritzhand AJ, Little JM, Little ER, Nunan PJ. Abductory midfoot osteotomy procedure for metatarsus adductus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1995;34:153–162. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(09)80039-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Heyman CH, Herndon CH, Strong JM. Mobilization of the tarsometatarsal and intermetatarsal joints for the correction of resistant adduction of the fore part of the foot in congenital club-foot or congenital metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40:299–310. [PubMed]
8. Hofmann AA, Constine RM, McBride GG, Coleman SS. Osteotomy of the first cuneiform as treatment of residual adduction of the fore part of the foot in club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:985–990. [PubMed]
9. Johanning K. Excochleatio ossis cuboidei in the treatment of pos equino-varus. Acta Orthop Scand. 1958;27:310–319. [PubMed]
10. Köse N, Günal I, Göktürk E, Seber S. Treatment of severe residual clubfoot deformity by trans-midtarsal osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1999;8:251–256. doi: 10.1097/00009957-199910000-00003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Lee DK, Benard M, Grumbine N, Pokrassa M, Weinstein S. Forefoot adductus correction in clubfoot deformity with cuboid-cuneiform osteotomy: a retrospective analysis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007;97:126–133. [PubMed]
12. Lourenco AF, Dias LS, Zoellick DM, Sodre H. Treatment of residual adduction deformity in clubfoot: the double osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:713–718. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200111000-00003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Lourenço AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:378–381. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18313. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. McHale KA, Lenhart MK. Treatment of residual clubfoot deformity—the “bean-shaped” foot–by opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy and closing wedge cuboid osteotomy. Clinical review and cadaver correlations. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11:374–381. [PubMed]
15. Pohl M, Nicol RO. Transcuneiform and opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy with closing wedge cuboid osteotomy in relapsed clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:70–73. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200301000-00014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Ponseti IV. Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of Treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 84.
17. Schaefer D, Hefti F. Combined cuboid/cuneiform osteotomy for correction of residual adductus deformity in idiopathic and secondary club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:881–884. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.10845. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Yu GV, Johng B, Freireich R. Surgical management of metatarsus adductus deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4:207–232. [PubMed]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons
]]>
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed//articles/PMC2664442/citedby/